Case law

Lenoir v. Linville Improvement Co.

51 L.R.A. 146 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 1900

The secretary and treasurer were both, ex officio members of the board of directors that so fixed their compensation. 9. … It is cited and followed by the Circuit Court of the United States in Malcomson v. Wappoo Mills, 88 Fed. Rep., 680. This rule applies in the case at baT.

O'Donnell v. . Carr

189 N.C. 77 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1925

Smith v. Brown, 132 N. C., 365 .

Wray v. . Woolen Mills

205 N.C. 782 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1934

(Mich.), 1011; Bushnell v. Industrial Board, 114 N. E. (Ill.), 496. Within a month after the death of the employee his dependents filed with the Commission a claim for compensation and it was allowed. … Clark v. Woolen Mills, 204 N. C., 529 ; Johnson v. Bagging Co., 203 N. C., 579 ; Aycock v. Cooper, 202 N. C., 500 . Judgment Affirmed.

Lawrence v. . Hyman

79 N.C. 209 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1878

Blum v, Stafford, 4 Jones, 94 . The interest which is secured to the witnesses by the deed is, that as members of the congregation of Zion church, “ they may at all times enjoy the privilege of worship therein.” … We consider this question settled adversely to this contention, by the cases of Green v. Castlebury, 70 N. C., 20 , and Armfield v. Brown, 70 N. C., 27 . Error. Pee. Curiam. Venire de novo.

Hancock v. . Davis

179 N.C. 282 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1920

This subject is discussed in the recent case of Kornegay v. Price, 100 S. E. … In First National Bank v. Guerra, 61 Cal., 109 , it is held that a wife cannot claim adversely to her husband or those claiming under him so long as he remains the head of the family. It is held further, in Hendricks v.

Jones v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

176 N.C. 260 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 23, 1918

engineer to use due care to operate the train at a moderate rate of speed, so as to enable his coemployee to board it without undue peril. … In Ry. v.

In re Newsom Oil Co.

273 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 1968

The Tax view Board to the effect that in computing intangibles tax lia-peal by Newsom Oil Company to the Superior Court, the judgment of the Tax Review Board was affirmed. The appellant has five assignments of error. … Davis v. Granite Corp., 259 N.C. 672 , 131 S.E. 2d 335 ; Long v. Smitherman, 251 N.C. 682 , 111 S.E. 2d 834 . The Legislature has the power to change the- law. The Court must construe the law as written.

Pearson v. . Sales Co.

202 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1931

In the annotation of Warner v. … Boswell v. Hosiery Mills , 191 N.C. at p. 556-7. The duty of the owner of premises to those who come on them is fully and well stated in Brigman v. Construction Co. , 192 N.C. 791 , by Brogden, J.; Hughes v.

Phillips v. . Trezevant

70 N.C. 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

State v. Palin , 63 N.C. 473 . … This principle is illustrated by Brown v.

State v. Giese

Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 2024

Appointed by and responsible to the Board of Commissioners, Ms. Griffin oversaw the county’s facilities and public services. Each year she also proposed a county budget to the Board. As county manager, Ms. … Each year, she proposed a county budget to the Board. See N.C.G.S. § 153A-82(a)(5). After the Board adopted a budget, she ensured that the money was properly spent. See N.C.G.S. § 153A-82(a)(4).

State v. Hayes.

138 N.C. 660 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 25, 1905

Brown, J. … State v. Ferguson, 107 N. C., 841 .

Jones v. . North Wilkesboro

150 N.C. 646 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1909

Without applying to the governing board of the municipality to do so, they brought the action. … Harper v. Milwaukee , 30 Wis. 365 . The injunctive power of the court will *Page 534 be exercised with great caution, and only in a clear case.

Howell v. . Harrell

71 N.C. 162 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

In Isler v. … Critcher v. McCadden , 64 N.C. 262 .

Creighton v. Water Commissioners.

143 N.C. 171 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1906

Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 341 . Defendant further excepts because tbe trial Court excluded a deed offered by defendant in mitigation or reduction of damages. … Crowell v. Beverly, 134 Mass., 98 .

Hoge v. . Lee

184 N.C. 44 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1922

*Page 47 Eberstein, dated 9 January, 1902, represented by index O, P, Q, R, S, 3, T, U, V. Plaintiffs introduced a deed from the State Board of Education to W. H. Whitely and S. R. … To this principle may be referred Slade v. Neal , 19 N.C. 61 ; Literary Board v. Clark , 31 N.C. 58 ; Bowen v. Lumber Co. , 153 N.C. 366 , and other similar decisions.

State v. Smith

328 N.C. 99 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1991

State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 199 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 15 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987). … California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 542 , *129 93 L. Ed. 2d 934, 940 (1987).

Holloway v. . Moser

193 N.C. 185 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 1927

Speaking to the subject in Brown v. Weaver, 76 Miss., 7 , Whitfield, J., says: “In Mr. Bishop’s new Criminal Law (8th ed., sec. 647, par. 3, note 1), Mr. Bishop cites Jackson v. … This, it appears, is only declaratory of the common law, so far as misdemeanants are concerned, and has the effect, as held in S. v. Brown, 82 N.

In Re Will of Hedgepeth

150 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 1909

Redfield, J., in Minkler v. … Jackson v. Brown, 6 Wend., 173 . It seems that if the will is shown to have been last seen in the custody of a third person no presumption. of revocation would arise. Shultz v. Shultz, 35 N.

Braswell v. . Richmond County

208 N.C. 649 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1935

ClaeicsON, J., dissenting: It may be conceded, as was said in the former opinion of this Court, Braswell v. Richmond County, 206 N. … Hammond v. City of Charlotte, 205 N. C., 469 ; Monteith v. Board of Commissioners, 195 N. C., 71 ; State v. Johnson, 170 N. C., 685 . Tbis action was carefully considered when tbe opinion was written before.

Sumner v. . Sessoms

94 N.C. 371 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1886

Albertson, 3 Dev., 241 ; *377 Skinner v. Moore, 2 D. & B., 138; Keaton v. Banks, 10 Ired., 384 , and numerous other cases, some of which are referred to in Mare v. … In Doyle v. Brown, 72 N.