Case law

Smithfield Improvement Co. v. Coley-Bardin

156 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1911

By the common law the lessor is under no implied covenant to rep'air, or even that the premises shall be fit for the purpose for which they are rented. 3 Kent Com., 465; Brown Leg. Max. (3 Ed.), 213-214; Fowler v. … Bank v. Newton, 76 N. Y., 616 .

Guthrie v. City of Durham

168 N.C. 573 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1915

Aiken v. Mfg. Co. , 141 N.C. 339 . But in this (575) case, if there should be a recovery against the defendant the city of Durham, A. E. Lloyd would be liable to the city, and it could recover in an action against him. … Dillon v. Raleigh , 124 N.C. 184 ; Brown v. Louisburg , 126 N.C. 701 ; Raleigh v. R. R. , 129 N.C. 265 ; Gregg v. Wilmington , 155 N.C. 18 . The discussion in Gregg v.

Huffman v. . Ingold

181 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1921

Strother v. R. R. , 123 N.C. 199 , and numerous cases there cited. … Lumber Co. v. Branch , 158 N.C. 251 , which the plaintiff requests us to do in this case.

State v. . Redman

217 N.C. 483 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1940

Royal v. Dodd, 177 N. C., 206 , 98 S. E., 599 ; S. v. Lance, 149 N. C., 551 ; S. v. Davis, 134 N. C., 633 ; S. v. Tyson, 133 N. C., 692 ; S. v. Brown, 100 N. C., 519 . … S. v. Lance, supra.

Fields v. . Ogburn

178 N.C. 407 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1919

Smithfield Improvement Co. v. Coley-Bardin, 156 N. C., 255 ; Edwards v. R. R., 98 N. Y., 245 ; Mullen v. Rainear, 45 N. J. L., 520; Doyle v. R. R., 147 U. S., 413 ; Walsh v. Schmidt, 206 Mass., 405 ; Thomas v. … Coley-Bardin, supra, Associate Justice Brown, delivering the opinion, it was said: “By the common law the lessor is under no implied covenant to repair, or even that the premises shall be fit for the purposes for which they

Mason v. . Johnston

215 N.C. 95 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1939

Pusey v. R. R., 181 N. C., 137 ; Campbell v. R. R., 201 N. C., 102 ; York v. York, 212 N. C., 695 (699). In Norfleet v. Hall, 204 N. … The first place of the motorcycle hitting the car must have been around that running board and crushed in here where the left hand fender and running board join.” T. E.

State v. . Turner

171 N.C. 803 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1916

Brown, J. The testimony tends to prove that the defendant had a handbag in Ms buggy on his way to Hayti, a colored settlement in Durham. … See, also, Yarborough v. Hughes, 139 N. C., 209 ; 16 Cyc., 1062.

Roscower v. . Bizzell

199 N.C. 656 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1930

Minnis v. Sharpe, 198 N. C., 364 , 151 S. E., 735 ; Braswell v. Morrow, 195 N. C., 127 , 141 S. E., 489 ; S. v. Trust Company, 192 N. C., 246 , 134 S. E., 656 ; Besseliew v. Brown, 177 N. C., 65 , 97 S. … Wall v. Howard, 194 N. C., 310 , 139 S. E., 449 ; Corp. Corn. v. Bank, 193 N. C., 113 , 136 S. E., 362 ; Douglass v. Dawson, 190 N. C., 458 , 130 S. E., 195 ; Coble v. Beall, 130 N. C., 533 , 41 S. E., 793 .

PHG Asheville, LLC v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 2020

PHG Asheville, LLC v. … , the board of adjustment, or the planning board.”

Sale v. State Highway & Public Works Commission

238 N.C. 599 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1953

Latham v. State Highway Comm., 191 N.C. 141 , 131 S.E. 385 ; Moore v. Clark, supra. The identical contracts offered in evidence in this case by the petitioners were before this Court in Brown v. … In that case Brown and wife trading as Rock Wool Insulating Company sought to recover damages for the loss by fire of goods stored in the warehouse referred to in this case.

Ragan v. County of Alamance

330 N.C. 110 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1991

Relying on Ward v. Commissioners, 146 N.C. 534 , 60 S.E. 418 (1908) and Vaughn v. … Because we have held that the County Commissioners are necessary parties, there was no harm in making the Board of County Commissioners a party.

Bank (First National of Charlotte) v. Alexander

85 N.C. 352 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1881

amount of the notes without deduction of the sum paid, and claims to share upon the basis of an unreduced debt in the .pro mta distribution of the fund in the hands of the executor, upon the authority of the decision in Brown … v.

Street v. Hildebrand

205 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1933

Brown, the purchaser at the sale made pursuant to the judgment, is now the owner of the said land by virtue of the deed executed to him by the commissioner appointed by the court. … Guy v. Harmon, 204 N. C., 226 , 167 S. E., 796 ; Orange Co. v. Wilson, 202 N. C., 424 , 163 S. E., 113 .

Winchester v. . Byers

196 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1928

Brown v. R. R., 165 N. C., at p. 396; Barcliff v. R. R., 168 N. C., 268 ; Eller v. Greensboro, 190 N. C., at p. 720. Taking the charge as a whole, and not disconnectedly, we think there is no reversible error. … Morrow v. Mills, 181 N. C., 423 ; Langley v. Hosiery Mills, 194 N. C., 644 . As to tbe right to take private property for public purposes, a different rule prevails. Mitchell v. Ahoskie, 190 N. C., 235 ; Eller v.

State Ex Rel. Gattis v. Griffin

125 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1899

and Mills v. … This is the doctrine of all the cases from Hoke v.

Kerner v. Southern Railway Co.

170 N.C. 94 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1915

BRowN, J. Tbe action is brought to recover damages for tbe destruction of tbe plaintiff’s factory in the town of Kernersville 15 April, 1912. … Albright v. Mitchell, 70 N. C., 445 ; Kirk v. Railway, 97 N. C., 82 .

Ward v. . Bell

52 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1859

The question arose again in the State v. … In the case of the State v.

In Re the Appeal of Corbett

355 N.C. 181 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2002

On 8 December 1997, a general warranty deed was recorded in the Office of the Pender County Register of Deeds, whereby the Corbetts conveyed .69 acres of their land to Edna Brown Wallin, Mrs. *183 Corbett’s sister. … Wallin separately appealed their 1998 property tax valuations to the Pender County Board of Equalization and Review, which affirmed the values assigned. The Corbetts and Ms.

Fisher v. Melton

326 N.C. 797 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1990

MELTON v. LILLIE P. MELTON; GRACE P. MILLAR, Executrix Of The Estate of Dorothy Melton; JOE H. MELTON, NORMA M. CALHOUN, PEGGY MELTON; ALICE M. SHEARIN; OLA M. BOSEMAN; LINDA M. ELLEN; THOMAS I. HUTCHINSON; JAMES B. … BASS; CAROLYN BASS BROWN; VIRGINIA D. BASS; PATTIE LOU SMITH; BARBARA F. COLLINS, Executrix Of The Estate of Lucinda D. Fulghum; HAZEL MELTON; JACQUELINE S. BAILEY, RONALD ELLIS SMITH; WILL H.

Hannon v. Commissioners of Halifax

89 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1883

Bledsoe v. Nixon, 69 N. C., 81 ; Isler v. Brown, Ib., 125; Perry v. Tupper, 71 N. C., 380 ; Skinner v. Bland, 87 N. C., 168 .