Case law

State v. . Stevens

153 N.C. 604 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1910

Brown, J. There are seventy-eight exceptions noted in the voluminous record in the case. … S. v. Harris, 46 N. C., 190 ; S. v. Dixon, 75 N. C., 277 . New trial.

State v. . Clifton

152 N.C. 800 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1910

In addition, tbe following cases are authority for the text: City of Faribault v. Wilson, 34 Wis., 255 ; Blair v. Forehand, 100 Mass., 136 ; Morey v. Brown, 42 N. H., 373; Mitchell v. Williams, 27 Ind., 62 . … When used in criminal statutes the word willful means not only designedly, but also with a “bad purpose.” 8 Words and Phrases, p. 7469, citing Potter v. United States, Sup. Court U. S., 39 Law Ed., 214; Commonwealth v.

Causey v. Snow.

120 N.C. 279 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1897

Pate v. Brown, 85 N. C., 166 ; Jackson v. Love, 82 N. C., 405 .

Howell v. Standard Ice & Fuel Co.

226 N.C. 730 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1946

Archie v. Lumber Co., 222 N. C., 477 , 23 S. E. (2d), 834 ; Michaux v. Bottling Co., 205 N. C., 786 , 172 S. E., 406 . … Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N. C., 766 , 32 S. E. (2d), 320 . The cases cited and relied on by defendants are clearly distinguishable.

Norton v. . McLelland

208 N.C. 137 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1935

Faircloth v. Kenlaw, 165 N. C., 228 , 81 S. E., 299 ; Deal v. Wilson, 178 N. C., 600 , 101 S. E., 205 . … Browne on tbe Statute of Frauds (5 Ed.), sec. 126.” Tbe rule of evidence thus established in this jurisdiction was reaffirmed in Deal v. Wilson, supra, Grantham v. Grantham, supra, and Lipe v. Trust Co., 206 N.

Faulkenbury v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM

483 S.E.2d 422 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1997

The defendants argue that Griffin v. Board of Comm'rs, 84 N.C.App. 443 , 352 S.E.2d 882 (1987), is inconsistent with Simpson and the Court of Appeals' opinion in this case. We agree. … In Crow v.

Shaw v. . Telegraph Co.

151 N.C. 638 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1910

Thompson v. Telegraph Co. , 107 N.C. 451 ; Harrison v. Telegraph Co. , 143 N.C. 150 (opinion by Justice Brown ); Sherrill v. Telegraph Co. , 117 N.C. 362 and 363. … BROWN, J., dissents. Cited: Carswell v. Telegraph Co. , 154 N.C. 118 ; Betts v. Telegraph Co. , 167 N.C. 81 ; Peyton v. Shoe Co., ibid. , 282.

Corey v. Hardison

236 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1952

Rodwell v. Harrison, 132 N.C. 45 , 43 S.E. 540 ; S. v. Osborne, 14 Ariz. 185 , 125 P. 884 ; Simpson v. Teftler, 176 Ark. 1093 , 5 S.W. 2d 350 ; Merwin v. Fussell, 93 Ark. 336 , 124 S.W. 1021 ; Kimberlin v. … R. 208 ; Gossard v. Vaught, 10 Kan. 162 ; Doores v. Varnon, 94 Ky. 507 , 22 S.W. 852 ; State v. Webb, 49 Mo. App. 407 ; State ex rel. White v. Ruark, 24 Mo. App. 325 ; State ex *153 rel. Sibbald v. Brickell, 59 N.

Bank of Wadesboro v. Caudle

239 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1954

Ingold v. Assurance Co., 230 N.C. 142 , 52 S.E. 2d 366 ; Whichard v. Lipe, 221 N.C. 53 , 19 S.E. 2d 14 . Both are required, Maddox v. … Brown, 232 N.C. 542 , 61 S.E. 2d 613 , and each must substantially correspond with *274 the other. Wilkins v. Finance Co., 237 N.C. 396 , 75 S.E. 2d 118 .

Luther v. . Skeen

53 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1861

Cited: S. v. Laxton , 76 N.C. 218 ; S. v. Brown, ibid. , 225; Lord v. Beard , 79 N.C. 13 ; S. v. Gee , 92 N.C. 760 ; S. v. Holly , 155 N.C. 492 . Distinguished: S. v. Lanier , 79 N.C. 624 . (359)

Harvy v. . Pike

4 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1817

Morse v. Slue , Ventris, 190, 238. But I am not prepared to say that the master would not be liable, even in an action founded on tort, for damage done to the goods while the pilot was on board. … The opinion of the Court in Snell v. Rich seems to be founded on the circumstance that the master was not on board when the accident happened. In Berry v.

Thomas v. Trustees of Catawba College

242 N.C. 504 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1955

of Trustees of the College, with reports to the meeting; (3) by-laws of the Board of Trustees in force during two designated years; and (4) faculty handbook for the year 1948. … The order appealed from will be vacated and set aside on authority of the decisions in Dunlap v. Guaranty & Accident Co., 202 N.C. 651 , 163 S.E. 750 , and Patterson v. R.R., 219 N.C. 23 , 12 S.E. 2d 652 .

Crook v. Warren Ex Rel. Warren

212 N.C. 93 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1937

Walker v. Mebane, 90 N. C., 259 ; Saleeby v. Brown, 190 N. C., 138 . If the note was paid and satisfied in full, the trustee’s deed was null and void and conveyed no right, title, or interest to the plaintiff.

Cedar Works v. . Shepard

181 N.C. 13 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 23, 1921

King v. Cooper, 128 N. C., 347 ; Matthews v. Fry, 141 N. C., 582 ; Warren v. Williford, 148 N. C., 474 ; Rexford v. Phillips, 159 N. C., 213 . … A full and clear discussion of the effect and validity of deeds executed by the State Board of Education will be found in Weston’s case as reported on the first appeal, in Weston v. Lumber Co., 162 N. C., 165 .

State v. . Hewett

158 N.C. 627 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 1912

BrowN, J". The bill is in the usual form, but omits the words “with intent.” … There are two decisions of this Court which sustain the contention of the defendant, S. v. Martin, 14 N. C., 329 , and S. v. Goldston, 103 N.

Eason v. . Eason

159 N.C. 539 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1912

Brown, J. … Acker v. Pridgen, 158 N. C., 338 ; Triplett v. Williams, 149 N. C., 394 ; Gudger v. White, 141 N. C., 513 .

State v. Blake

319 N.C. 599 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1987

Defendant was wearing “a black tee-shirt, blue jeans, and a pair of brown boots. . . .” Other evidence showed defendant to be a white male with shoulder-length dark blond, or light brown, hair. … State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 731 , 268 S.E. 2d 201 (1980); State v. Jenkins, 300 N.C. 578 , 268 S.E. 2d 458 (1980).

Delamothe v. . Lane

4 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1816

NOTE. — Upon the question of notice to an executor or administrator of a debt of higher dignity, see Brown v. Lane , 3 N.C. 159 . In Evans v. … Austin v. Holmes , 23 N.C. 399 . Cited: Green v. Williams , 33 N.C. 141 ; Whitley v. Alexander , 73 N.C. 462 . (298)

Brooks v. . Avery County

206 N.C. 840 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1934

. *842 Tbe following is the preamble to a resolution adopted by the board of county commissioners of Avery County, North Carolina, on 26 March, 1934: “Whereas, the county has outstanding the following described valid indebtedness … R. v. Cherokee County, 195 N. C., 756 ; Barbour v. Wake County, 197 N. C., 314 ; Bolich v. Winston-Salem, 202 N. C., 786 .

Shepherd v. . Shepherd

179 N.C. 121 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

Brown, J. The case on appeal states that summons was issued 31 July, 1918, returnable to August term of said court, and duly served on defendants 8 August, 1918. … McMillan v. Baker, 85 N. C., 291 , and cases cited in the opinion. In the case at bar the answer was filed at the same term with the complaint.