Opinion

Shepherd v. . Shepherd

  • 179 N.C. 121
  • 101 S.E. 489
  • 1919 N.C. LEXIS 22
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Dec 20, 1919
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Brown
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 65.4%

The opinion

Brown, J.

The case on appeal states that summons was issued 31 July, 1918, returnable to August term of said court, and duly served on defendants 8 August, 1918. At November Term, 1918, neither party asked that the case be placed for trial on the calendar at said term. Before the April Term of court, 1919, was to begin the case was again continued by consent, and not placed on the calendar. No court was held at said term on account of the sickness of Judge McElroy’s family.

At August Term, 1919, the case was again by consent continued to November Term, 1919, and not placed on the trial calendar. On the last day of said August Term, 1919, upon motion of plaintiffs, no notice having been served on the defendants, judgment was entered for the plaintiffs as appears in the record for want of a defense bond. The complaint was filed 13 August, 1918. The answer was filed 13 August, 1918. Under the circumstances of this case, it was error in the court to strike out the answer of the defendant without notice because no defense bond bad been filed.

The defendant was entitled to a rule to show cause, and then if the court adjudged that a defense bond was required, the defendants were entitled to time within which to file the same. It appears in the case on appeal that the cause was continued at August Term, 1919, by consent until the next term, and that this motion was made and granted on the last day of August term. The point is expressly decided in

Cooper v. Warlick,

109 N. C., 672 , where the cases were cited. This is not a matter within the discretion of the judge. An order of the Superior Court striking out an answer for want of a bond is reviewable where the defendant has been lead to believe that the plaintiff has waived the bond.

McMillan v. Baker,

85 N. C., 291 , and cases cited in the opinion.

In the case at bar the answer was filed at the same term with the complaint. No motion was made for an entire year, and then only

*123

when the case bad been continued for the term, and on the last day of that term.

Judgment is set aside and the Superior Court is directed to allow the defendant to file the defense bond within a reasonable time.

Eeversed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.