Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

2.16s

  • State v. Fowler

    151 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1909

    BROWN, J. Tbis appeal presents two assignments of error. 1. Did tbe judge err in submitting to the jury the question of manslaughter? Under State v. Quick, 150 N. … State v. Hagan, 131 N. C., 802 ; State v. Brittain, 89 N. C., 501, 502 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kerr Grain & Hay Co. v. Marion Cash Feed Co.

    179 N.C. 654 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1920

    Millhiser v. Balsley, 106 N. C., 433 . Tbe case of Barnhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 , has no application, as it relates to the service of summons on an officer, or agent, under laws of 1889, cb. 108. … Devries v. Summit, 86 N. C., 126 . 2.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. . Spain

    201 N.C. 571 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1931

    S. v. Cox, ante, 357; S. v. Johnston, supra; S. v. Fleming, 107 N. C., 905 , 12 S. E., 131 . … S. v. Ratcliffs, supra; S. v. Newsome, 195 N. C., 552 , 143 S. E., 187 ; S. v. Brown, 113 N. C., 645 , 18 S. E., 51 . New trial.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • In Re Walker

    282 N.C. 28 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1972

    Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 169 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 (1966); Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 811 , 83 S.Ct. 814 (1963); Griffin v. … Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, supra; Williams v. Rhodes, supra. A showing of mere rationality is insufficient.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Jennings v. State Highway Commission

    183 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1922

    Dickson v. Perkins, 172 N. C., 359 ; Jeffress v. Greenville, 154 N. C., 490 ; S. v. Jones, 139 N. C., 613 ; Lynch v. Forbes, 161 Mass., 302 ; 1st Elliott on Roads and Streets (3 ed.), secs. 250-256; 15 Cyc., 632. … S. v. Jones, supra; Kinston v. Loftin, 149 N. C., 255 ; 15 Cyc., 632.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Lawson v. . Baer

    52 N.C. 461 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1860

    So the defect, in this instance, was patent, and the charge of his Honor is supported by Brown v. Gray, '6th Jones’ Rep. 103, by which the law, in regard to patent and latent defects, is considered as settled.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.

    245 N.C. 281 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 1957

    Bartlett v. Hopkins, 235 N.C. 165 , 69 S.E. 2d 236 ; Brown v. Clement Co., 217 N.C. 47 , 6 S.E. 2d 842 ; Booker v. Highlands, 198 N.C. 282 , 151 S.E. 635 . … Brown v. Clement Co., supra, and cases cited. And, estoppel, laches, and statutes of limitation have been held to constitute such pleas in bar. Grady v. Parker, 230 N.C. 166 , 52 S.E. 2d 273 ; Graves v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Cable v. . Hardin

    67 N.C. 472 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1872

    Robeson v. Brown, 63 N. C., 554 . Now, was the consideration of the note of 1864, a loan of Confederate money, or a purchase of property ? … State v. Cordon, 8 Ire. 179, Story’s Prom. Notes, 404, 408; Cornwell v. Gould, 4 Pick. 144 ; Hare v. Alexander, 2 Metc. 157 ; Gabriel v. Draper, 80 E. C. L. R.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cozart v. . Fleming

    123 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1898

    In Swain v. … Section 22 of the act; Moore v. Jones, supra . In Broughton v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Henry King Ex'r v. W. & W. R. R. Co.

    66 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1872

    Robeson v. Brown, 63 N. C. 554 . Hilliard v. Moore, 65 N. C., 540 , and the intermediate cases.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Town of Wilson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

    205 N.C. 262 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1933

    Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 25 . … It is practically conceded that under the decision in Timber Co. v. Ins. Co., 190 N. C., 801 , 130 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Pendleton

    339 N.C. 379 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 30, 1994

    In addition, the authority of such college or *383 university policemen may be extended by agreement between the employer institution’s board of trustees and the governing board of the municipality or county in which the … the University’s Board of Trustees and the governing board of the county, the University’s police power may extend county-wide.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • White v. . Pleasants

    225 N.C. 760 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1945

    Abbott v. Hunt, 129 N. C., 403 , 40 S. E., 119 ; Lamb v. Baxter, 130 N. C., 67 , 40 S. E., 850 ; Smith v. Browne, 132 N. C., 365 , 43 S. E., 915 ; Palmer v. Lowder, 167 N. C., 331 , 83 S. E., 464 . … See also Abbott v. Hunt, supra; Clark v. Lumber Co., 158 N. C., 139 , 73 S. E., 793 ; Crowell v. Parker, 171 N. C., 392 , 88 S. E., 497 ; Real Estate Co. v. Sasser, 179 N. C., 497 , 103 S. E., 73 ; Hagood v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. . American Bible Society

    42 N.C. 201 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1851

    Eq. 30, and Barnes v Simmons, 5 Ire. Eq. 392. … Barnes v Simmons, was also heard upon bill and answer.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hardison v. National Handle Co.

    194 N.C. 351 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1927

    The latest expression on the subject is to be found in Spruill v. Mfg. Co., 180 N. … This is not at variance with the rule first stated in Lewis v. Keeling, 46 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Green v. . Williams

    144 N.C. 60 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1907

    Cheney, .and of the witness Brown, who is also a surveyor, was of such a character that the jury might reasonably decide therefrom as to the position of the true line dividing the one lot from the other. … Parker v. Taylor, 133 N. C., 103 ; Hill v. Dalton, 136 N. C., 339 (s. c., 140 N. C., 9 ) ; Smith v. Johnson, 137 N. C., 43 ; Stanaland v. Rabon, 140 N. C., 204 ; Davis v. Wall, 142 N. C., 450 ; and Woody v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Chandler v. Mashburn

    233 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1951

    Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732 , 40 S.E. 2d 412 . Hence, averments narrating evidence which defendant contends sustains his *279 denial of the controverted facts are irrelevant as pleading, and have no place in the answer. … Revis v. Asheville, 207 N.C. 237 , 176 S.E. 738 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. . Lewald

    108 N.C. 405 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

    Andrews v. Whisnant, 83 N. C., 446 ; Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 127 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rodman v. . Norman

    221 N.C. 320 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1942

    In Lumber Co. v. Herrington, 183 N. C., 85 , 110 S. … In Hines v. Williams, 198 N. C., 420 , 152 S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Faison v. . Odom

    144 N.C. 107 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1907

    Brown, J. … Hauser v. Craft, 134 N. C., 329 , and cases cited; Starnes v. Hill, 112 N. C., 1 ; Rollins v. Keel, 115 N. C., 68 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.