Opinion

Town of Wilson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

  • 205 N.C. 262
  • 171 S.E. 68
  • 1933 N.C. LEXIS 527
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Oct 11, 1933
Status
Published
Author
Stacy
On the bench
Stacy
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.2%

The opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The petitions for removal, besides showing requisite jurisdictional amounts, assert rights of removal on grounds of diverse citizenship and separable controversies.

Brown v. R. R.,

204 N. C., 25 .

The liabilities of the corporate defendants are predicated upon three separate bonds, one executed by the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland to protect the plaintiff against larceny or embezzlement of the town clerk, and the others executed by Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York to insure the faithful performance of duties and accounting on the part of the assistant clerk and cashier.

It is practically conceded that under the decision in

Timber Co. v. Ins. Co.,

190 N. C., 801 , 130 S. E., 864 , the motions should have been allowed, unless the allegation of a conspiracy among the individual defendants defeats the rights of removal on grounds of separable controversies. We fail to see wherein this allegation changes the liability of the corporate defendants on their respective bonds, or affects the question of separability, upon which the rights of removal depend.

Eeversed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.