Case law

Dixon v. . Horne

180 N.C. 585 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1920

Supply Co. v. Lumber Co., 160 N. C., 428 ; Withers v. Poe, 167 N. C., 372 ; Voorhees v. Porter, 134 N. C., 591 ; Town of Gastonia v. Engineering Co., 131 N. C., 363 , and Gorrell v. Water Co., 124 N. C., *587 328. … Knight & Jillson Co. v. Arthur Castle, 172 Ind., 97 ; reported also in 42 L. R. A., U. S., 573, with note by the editor. Ocho v. Carnahan Co., 42 Ind. App., 157 ; Brown v. Markland, 22 Ind. App., 652 ; Jordan v.

Leonard v. NC FARM BUR. MUT. INS. CO.

332 N.C. 656 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1992

423 S.E.2d 71 (1992) 332 N.C. 656 Andre LEONARD and Renee Leonard v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 40A92. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 19, 1992. Duffus and Associates, P.A. by J. … Brown, for defendant-appellant. PER CURIAM. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Silverman, *72 332 N.C. 633 , 423 S.E.2d 68 , filed today.

Gaskins v. . Mitchell

194 N.C. 275 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 1927

In Carter v. McGill, 168 N. … See, also, Brown v. Ruffin, 189 N. C., 262 , where it is said that when a material defense is pleaded, it is proper for the court to submit an issue on it. Owens v. Phelps, 95 N. C., 286 .

McIver v. Stephens

101 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1888

England v. Garner, 90 N. C., 197 . … Edwards v. Moore, 99 N. C., 1 , and the cases there cited; England v. Garner, supra; Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 ; Grimes v. Taft, 98 N. C., 193 , and cases there cited.

In Re the Will of Kemp

236 N.C. 680 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 1953

Lloyd, 209 N.C. 483 , 183 S.E. 756 ; In re Will of Hargrove, 206 N.C. 307 , 173 S.E. 577 ; In re Will of Brown, 194 N.C. 583 , 140 S.E. 192 ; In re Craig, 192 N.C. 656 , 135 S.E. 798 ; Hyatt v. … Guy v. Bank, 206 N.C. 322 , 173 S.E. 600 ; McNeill v. Thomas, 203 N.C. 219 , 165 S.E. 712 ; Jones v. Marble Co., 137 N.C. 237 , 49 S.E. 94 ; Carey v. Carey, 108 N.C. 267 , 12 S.E. 1038 ; Hughes v.

State v. . Hicks

179 N.C. 733 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 1920

Laws 1913, ch. 44, sec. 6; S. v. Brown, 170 N. C., 714 , or without negativing the conditions under which it may be lawfully sold, S. v. Moore, 166 N. C., 284 . … S. v. Wainscott, 169 N. C., 379 , citing S. v. Moore, supra, where the matter is fully discussed; S. v. Hicks, 174 N. C., 802 .

Thomas v. . Simpson

80 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1879

His Honor allowed the defendants to plead a counter claim for board of plaintiff and his hireling while making the shingles.. The testimony in the case was conflicting. … Trustees of Monroe v. Female University 30 Ga. 1 . No error. Affirmed.

State v. Bailey

100 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1888

Simpson v. Blount, 3 Dev., 34 ; Brown v. Morris, 4 D. & B., 429; State v. O’Neal, 7 Ired., 251 ; Arey v. Stephenson, 12 Ired., 34 ; Hice v. Woodard, Ibid., 293, and more recent cases. 2.

Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

154 N.C. 523 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1911

Lawson on Expert and Opinion Ev. (2 Ed.), p. 557; Smith v. Smith, 117 N. C., 326 ; Hoffman v. R. R., 51 Mo. Ap., 274. There is nothing to take this case out of that general rule. … Wilkinson v. Dunbar, 149 N. C., 21 ; Davenport v. R. R., 148 N. C., 294 ; Lumber Co. v. R. R., 151 N. C., 221 . New trial.

Johnson v. . Bray

174 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1917

Brown, J. … It is expressly decided in Satterthwaite v. Ellis, 129 N. C., 67 , that the assignee of a chattel mortgage is entitled to the possession of the property before the mortgage becomes due.

McDevitt v. . McDevitt

150 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1909

Brown, J. Tbis was a special proceeding, begun before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Madison County, for the purpose of partitioning land between tenants in common. … Tbis Court has held, in Floyd v. Rock, 128 N. C., p. 10, that exceptions must be filed within tbe twenty days after tbe report-is filed.

Land Co. v. . Bostic

168 N.C. 99 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1914

It does not come under the decisions where a creditor accepts money under a clear and definite condition that the remittance is to be in full, as in Bank v. Justice, 157 N. … C., 373 , and cases of that kind; but it is of that character which permits interpretation and comes rather under Aydlett v. Brown, 153 N. C., 334 , and Armstrong v. Lonon, 149 N.

Smith v. County of Mecklenburg

280 N.C. 497 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1972

If favored by the majority, provision was made for the establishment of a City Board of Alcoholic Control. … The act provided further “that the City Board shall have all the powers and duties imposed by G.S. 18-45 on County Boards; shall be subject to the same powers and authority of the State Board as are County Boards under G.S

Howerton v. . Tate

70 N.C. 160 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

P. 81; Lightly v. Clouston , 1 Taunt. 112, Allen v. McKean , 1 Summer 276; Bayton v. Dodsworth , 6 Term R. 681; Dorsey v. Smythe County Auditor , 28 Cal. 21 ." … McCall v. Webb 135 N.C. 361 ; Osborne v. Canton 219 N.C. 150 .

Grimes v. HOME CREDIT COMPANY OF KINSTON

271 N.C. 608 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1967

Edwards v. Hamill, 266 N.C. 304 , 145 S.E. 2d 884 ; Branch v. Dempsey, 265 N.C. 733 , 145 S.E. 2d 395 ; Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 217 N.C. 368 , 8 S.E. 2d 199 . … Barnes v. Hotel Corp., 229 N.C. 730, 731-32 , 51 S.E. 2d 180, 181 . Accord, Hedrick v. Tigniere, 267 N.C. 62 , 147 S.E. 2d 550 ; Murrell v. Handley, 245 N.C. 559 , 96 S.E. 2d 717 .

Gwathmey v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF ENVIR.

342 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1995

In Tatum v. … Rohrer v.

Staley v. . Lowe

197 N.C. 243 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1929

Brown v. Williams, 196 N. C., 247 . Upon the second theory involving quantum meruit, the law is thus stated in Winkler v. Killian, 141 N. C., 575 , 54 S. … Winkler v. Killian, 141 N. C., 575 , 54 S. E., 540 ; Dorsett v. Dorsett, 183 N. C., 354 , 111 S. E., 541 ; Ellis v. Cox, 176 N. C., 616 , 97 S. E., 468 .

Skinner v. Gaither Corp.

234 N.C. 385 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1951

Kelly v. Trimont Lodge, 154 N.C. 97 , 69 S.E. 764 ; Williams v. Manufacturing Co., 153 N.C. 7 , 68 S.E. 902 ; Nelson v. R. R., 157 N.C. 194 , 72 S.E. 998 ; Hargett v. DeLisle, 229 N.C. 384 , 49 S.E. 2d 739 ; Brown v. … Manufacturing Co., supra; Tarpley v.

State v. Courtney

248 N.C. 447 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1958

S. v. Brown, 225 N.C. 22 , 33 S.E. 2d 121 . Coming as it did, however, after verdict, the amendment was ineffectual to supply the deficiency of the jury’s finding. … In S. v. Stokes, 181 N.C. 539 , 106 S.E. 763 , the indictment charged that defendant assaulted one Jessie Brown, “she being a female over the age of eighteen years of age.”

Burris v. . Creech

220 N.C. 302 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1941

Nothing can be added to tbe discussion there bad by Brown and Uolce, JJ., tbe one speaking for tbe majority, tbe other for tbe minority. 'The subject was exhausted in that debate. … Tbe case was *304 later distinguished in Bell v. Danzer, 187 N. C., 224 , 121 S. E., 448 . See 22 Am. Jur., 546 ; 11 R. C. L., 877; Hornsby v. Smith, 13 S. E. (2d), 20 , 113 A. L. R., 684.