Case law

Hammett v. Southern Railway Co.

157 N.C. 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1911

BROWN, J. … We think the case comes within the principles laid down in Heavener v. R. R., 141 N. C., 245 ; Purnell v. R. R., 122 N. C., 832 ; Stanley v. R. R., 120 N. C., 514 . The judgment of nonsuit is set aside. New trial.

Cayton v. . Clark

212 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1937

Bowie v. Tucker, 197 N. C., 671 , 150 S. E., 200 ; Bank v. Duke, 187 N. C., 386 , 122 S. E., 1 ; Land Co. v. Wooten, 177 N. C., 248 , 98 S. E., 706 ; School v. Peirce, 163 N. C., 424 , 79 S. E., 687 ; McLeod v. … — Brown, J., in Glisson v. Glisson, 153 N. C., 185 , 69 S. E., 55 .

Skinner v. Gaither Corp.

234 N.C. 385 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1951

Kelly v. Trimont Lodge, 154 N.C. 97 , 69 S.E. 764 ; Williams v. Manufacturing Co., 153 N.C. 7 , 68 S.E. 902 ; Nelson v. R. R., 157 N.C. 194 , 72 S.E. 998 ; Hargett v. DeLisle, 229 N.C. 384 , 49 S.E. 2d 739 ; Brown v. … Manufacturing Co., supra; Tarpley v.

Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers

201 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1931

Nesbitt v. Donoho, 198 N. C., 147 , 150 S. E., 875 ; Staley v. Lowe, 197 N. C., 243 , 148 S. E., 240 ; Stallings v. Ellis, 136 N. C., 69 , 48 S. E., 548 . … Nesbitt v. Donoho, supra; Dunn v. Currie, 141 N. C., 123 , 53 S. E., 533 ; Brown v. Williams, 196 N. C., 247 , 145 S. E., 233 ; Henderson v. McLain, 146 N. C., 329 , 59 S. E., 873 ; Winkler v. Killian, 141 N.

O'Neal v. South & Western Railroad

152 N.C. 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1910

BrowN, J. … Tbe law governing tbe case is so fully stated in tbe opinion of this Court by tbe Chief Justice in Nicholson v. R. R., 138 N. C., 516 , that it is unnecessary to further discuss tbe subject. Affirmed.

Allison v. . Comrs. of Buncombe

210 N.C. 467 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1936

That the plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the county of Buncombe and of the State of North Carolina, and that the individual defendants constitute the Board of County Commissioners of Buncombe County, and as such are … See Valley Farms Co. v. Westchester County , 261 U.S. 155 , 67 L.Ed., 585 .

Atkinson v. City of Asheville

205 N.C. 36 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1933

This evidence, it would seem, is sufficient to carry the case to the jury under the principles announced in Brown v. R. R., 188 N. C., 52 , 123 S. E., 633 , S. v. Williams, 153 N. C., 595 , 68 S. … E., 900 , and differentiates it from Harrison v. New Bern, 193 N. C., 555, 137 S. E., 582 , cited and relied upon by defendants. ¥e refrain from a discussion of the evidence, as its credibility is for the jury. Reversed.

State v. . Haynie

169 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1915

R. v. Davis, 19 N. C., 451 ; Johnston v. Rankin, 70 N. C., 550 ; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 . And it cannot, under tbe guise of calling it a cartway, take away this protection from tbe owner. … Brown v. Bower Co., supra. This private way is not within the descriptive words of the Public-Local Laws of 1913, ch. 40, sec. 23.

Delconte v. State

313 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1985

Weisse v. Board of Education of City of New York, 1941, 178 Misc. 118 , 32 N.Y.S. 2d 258 ; Board of Education of City School District of City of Cleveland v. Ferguson, 1941, 68 Ohio App. 514 , 39 N.E. 2d 196 . … Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 ; see also, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). But it is not clear whether the Court would consider the right to engage in home instruction to be fundamental. See Board of Education v.

Roberts v. . Lewald

108 N.C. 405 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

Andrews v. Whisnant, 83 N. C., 446 ; Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 127 .

White v. . Lane

153 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 14, 1910

But as the owners of land within the district are not incompetent to sit on the board of viewers to pass upon the classification and assessment of the several tracts in the first 'instance, it would not seem that the clerk … Eastman v. Comrs., 119 N. C., 505 ; Johnson v. Rankin, 70 N. C., 550 . Cases in which the clerk would be disqualified to act are cited in Land Co. v. Jennett, 128 N. C., 4 .

In Re Walker

282 N.C. 28 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1972

Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 169 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 (1966); Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 811 , 83 S.Ct. 814 (1963); Griffin v. … Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, supra; Williams v. Rhodes, supra. A showing of mere rationality is insufficient.

Den on Demise of Pendleton v. Pendleton

6 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1811

The ease before the Court is very much like the case of Pells v. Brown, (Cro. … The principle of that decision has been approved in the cases of Patton v. Bradly, (3 Term 145,) and Roe v. Jeffrey, (7 Term 589,) In the case of Hughes v. Sayer, (1 P.

Dixon v. . Horne

180 N.C. 585 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1920

Supply Co. v. Lumber Co., 160 N. C., 428 ; Withers v. Poe, 167 N. C., 372 ; Voorhees v. Porter, 134 N. C., 591 ; Town of Gastonia v. Engineering Co., 131 N. C., 363 , and Gorrell v. Water Co., 124 N. C., *587 328. … Knight & Jillson Co. v. Arthur Castle, 172 Ind., 97 ; reported also in 42 L. R. A., U. S., 573, with note by the editor. Ocho v. Carnahan Co., 42 Ind. App., 157 ; Brown v. Markland, 22 Ind. App., 652 ; Jordan v.

Cable v. . Hardin

67 N.C. 472 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1872

Robeson v. Brown, 63 N. C., 554 . Now, was the consideration of the note of 1864, a loan of Confederate money, or a purchase of property ? … State v. Cordon, 8 Ire. 179, Story’s Prom. Notes, 404, 408; Cornwell v. Gould, 4 Pick. 144 ; Hare v. Alexander, 2 Metc. 157 ; Gabriel v. Draper, 80 E. C. L. R.

Dunn v. Beaman &8212 No. 1

126 N.C. 764 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 29, 1900

Browning v. Porter, 116 N. C., 62 . No error*.

City of Sanford v. SOUTHERN OIL COMPANY

244 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 26, 1956

In re Stokley, 240 N.C. 658 , 83 S.E. 2d 703 ; Bell v. Nivens, 225 N.C. 35, 33 S.E. 2d 66 ; S. v. Moore, 210 N.C. 686 , 188 S.E. 421 ; Taylor v. Johnson, 171 N.C. 84 , 87 S.E. 981 ; Todd v. … Baker v. Varser, 240 N.C. 260 , 82 S.E. 2d 357 ; Russ v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. 128 , 59 S.E. 2d 64 ; Belk’s Department Store, Inc., v. Guilford County, 222 N.C. 441 , 23 S.E. 2d 897 .

Roberts v. Pratt

152 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1910

Moody v. Johnston, 112 N. C., 798 -801; Brown v. Pratt, 56 N. C., 202 . … See, also, McIntosh v. Commissioners, 13 Kan., 171 ; Thompson v. Council, 31 Oregon, 231; Browning v. Roane, 9 Ark., 354; Bounse v. Barker, 1 Greene, 263 .

Cozart v. . Fleming

123 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1898

In Swain v. … Section 22 of the act; Moore v. Jones, supra . In Broughton v.

White v. . Pleasants

225 N.C. 760 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1945

Abbott v. Hunt, 129 N. C., 403 , 40 S. E., 119 ; Lamb v. Baxter, 130 N. C., 67 , 40 S. E., 850 ; Smith v. Browne, 132 N. C., 365 , 43 S. E., 915 ; Palmer v. Lowder, 167 N. C., 331 , 83 S. E., 464 . … See also Abbott v. Hunt, supra; Clark v. Lumber Co., 158 N. C., 139 , 73 S. E., 793 ; Crowell v. Parker, 171 N. C., 392 , 88 S. E., 497 ; Real Estate Co. v. Sasser, 179 N. C., 497 , 103 S. E., 73 ; Hagood v.