Case law

Redd v. Taylor

270 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1967

When both Division of World Missions of the Board of Missions of the Methodist Church, Inc., and Board of World Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States, Inc., claimed to be the designated beneficiary, the … Convention, the Foreign Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, and the trustees of the Thomasville Baptist *23 Orphanage, and the judgment so decreed.

Stewart v. . Lumber Co.

146 N.C. 47 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1907

Three justices concurring in the opinion of Justice Brown upon each issue, it becomes the opinion of the Court, and a new trial is ordered upon the second issue, relating to damages. Cited: S. v. … Fulton , 149 N.C. 501 ; Powell v. Fiber Co. , 150 N.C. 15 ; Jones v. R. R., ib. , 476; Blackburn v. Lumber Co. , 152 N.C. 363 ; Marlowe v. Bland , 154 N.C. 146 ; Dover v. Mfg. Co. , 157 N.C. 329 ; Bucken v. R.

State v. Leroux

326 N.C. 368 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1990

State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E.2d 1 . We conclude that this argument has no merit. … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563 , 313 S.E.2d 585 (1984).

Rogers v. . McGowan

68 N.C. 520 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873

The questions in this case are substantially the same *Page 360 as in Nichols v. McKee, ante , 429, and Welker v. Bledsoe, ante , 457, and are governed by the same principles and for the same reasons. … Cited: Welker v. Bledsoe, ante , 465; Brown v. Turner , 70 N.C. 107 .

Tyndall v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 2013

Pinto Coates Kyre & Brown, PLLC, by Kenneth Kyre, Jr., for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys and North Carolina Chamber, amici curiae. Carlton Fields, P.A., by Wendy F. … TYNDALL V. FORD Opinion of the Court Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Allen v. Allen

235 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1952

Ericson, 226 N.C. 474 , 38 S.E. 2d 517 ; Washington County v. Land Co., 222 N.C. 637 , 24 S.E. 2d 338 ; Bank v. McCullers, 211 N.C. 327 , 190 S.E. 217 ; Insurance Co. v. Bullard, supra; S. v. … Goodman v. Goodman, 208 N.C. 416 , 181 S.E. 328 ; Payne v. Brown, 205 N.C. 785 , 172 S.E. 348 ; Riggan v. Harrison, 203 N.C. 191 , 165 S.E. 358 ; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788 , 156 S.E. 126 . Appeal dismissed.

Lindsay v. Norfolk & Southern Railroad

132 N.C. 59 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1903

talking, were sitting on the running board a few feet distant. … House v. Railroad, 131 N. C., 103 .

State Ex Rel. Sneed v. Bullock

80 N.C. 132 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1879

He was thereupon notified to appear before the new board and qualify according to the requirements of law. … The case is not like that of Jones v. Jones, ante, 127, though many of the facts are common to both.

State v. McElrath

322 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1988

In State v. … In State v.

Duffy v. . Phipps

180 N.C. 313 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1920

Henofer v. Realty Co., 178 N. C., 584 . Tbe defendant contends tbat tbe contract was merged in tbe deed, and therefore tbe complaint does not state a cause of action. … McGee v. Craven, 106 N. C., 353 ; Brown v. Hobbs, 147 N. C., 77 ; Kendricks v. Ins. Co., 124 N. C., 318 .

Bailey v. . Meadows Company

152 N.C. 603 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 17, 1910

*604 Brown, J. Taking the plaintiff’s evidence in the most favorable view for him, we are of opinion that the motion to nonsuit should have been sustained. … As the road was being constructed' and not'Operated, the principles laid down in Nicholson v. R. R., 138 N. C., 516 , and reiterated at this term in O’Neal v. R. R., ante 404, bar a recovery.

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

268 N.C. 242 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1966

Corporation Commission v. R. R., 139 N.C. 126 , 51 S.E. 793 ; Utilities Com. v. R. R., 233 N.C. 365 , 64 S.E. 2d 272 ; Utilities Commission v. R. R., 254 N.C. 73 , 118 S.E. 2d 21 . … Utilities Com. v. R. R., 233 N.C. 365 , 64 S.E. 2d 272 .

Anderson v. Town of Albemarle

182 N.C. 434 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1921

Justice v. Asheville, 161 N. C., 62. … Felmet v. Canton, 177 N. C., 52 ; Justice v. Asheville, 161 N. C., 62 ; Tarboro v. Staton, 156 N. C., 504 .

Broadfoot v. Atlantic Coast Line Railway Co.

174 N.C. 410 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 24, 1917

Brown, J. … Currie v. R. R., 150 N. C., 419 ; Williams v. R. R., 140 N. C., 624 . Tbe rule governing actions of this character is clearly stated in tbe latter case. New trial.

Morrison v. . Watson

95 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

Brown, 88 N. C., 156 ; and in Turrentine v. Railroad, 92 N. C., 638 . … Hilliard v. Outlaw, 72 N. C. 266 .

S. v. . Durham

121 N.C. 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

S. v. Glenn , 118 N.C. 1194 ; S. v. Bryson , 81 N.C. 595 ; S. v. Crawley , 103 N.C. 353 . … Cited: S. v. Wells , 142 N.C. 595 ; S. v. Mallard , 143 N.C. 667 ; S. v. Taggart , 170 N.C. 741 .

Lithium Corp. of America v. Town of Bessemer City

261 N.C. 532 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1964

Dunn v. Tew, 219 N.C. 286 , 13 S.E. 2d 536 ; Highlands v. Hickory, 202 N.C. 167 , 162 S.E. 471 ; Lutterloh v. Fayetteville, 149 N.C. 65 , 62 S.E. 758 . … Porter v. Yoder & Gordon Co., 246 N.C. 398 , 98 S.E. 2d 497 ; Smith v. Davis, 228 N.C. 172 , 45 S.E. 2d 51 .

Powell & Powell, Inc. v. Wake Water Co.

171 N.C. 290 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1916

Walkee, J., dissenting: In Morton v. Water Co., 168 N. … Brown and Hoke, JJ., did not sit on the hearing of this case.

Thrush v. Thrush

245 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1956

Harrison, 203 N.C. 191 , 165 S.E. 358 ; Armstrong v. Service Stores, 203 N.C. 231 , 165 S.E. 680 ; Parks v. Seagraves, 203 N.C. 647 , 166 S.E. 747 ; Payne v. Brown, 205 N.C. 785 , 172 S.E. 348 ; S. v. … Lumber Co., 207 N.C. 47 , 175 S.E. 713 ; Goodman v. Goodman, 208 N.C. 416 , 181 S.E. 328 ; Abernethy v. Trust Co., 211 N.C. 450 , 190 S.E. 735 ; Washington County v. Land Co., 222 N.C. 637 , 24 S.E. 2d 338 ; Ericson v.

Smith v. Barnes

236 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1952

Chambers v. Allen, 233 N.C. 195 , 63 S.E. 2d 212 ; Carson v. Doggett, 231 N.C. 629 , 58 S.E. 2d 609 ; Thomas v. Motor Lines, 230 N.C. 122 , 52 S.E. 2d 377 ; Bundy v. Powell, 229 N.C. 707 , 51 S.E. 2d 307 . … Bowen v. Darden, 233 N.C. 443 , 64 S.E. 2d 285 ; Maddox v. Brown, 232 N.C. 542 , 61 S.E. 2d 613 ; Ingold v.