Case law

Chairman v. . Clark

11 N.C. 43 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1825

This case presents the precise question that was made in McKellar v. Bowell, ante , 34. In that case the Superior Court rejected the evidence properly; in this case it was erroneously admitted. … Cited: Armistead v. Harramond, post , 341; Governor v. Carter , 25 N.C. 341 ; Brown v. Pike , 74 N.C. 534 ; Moore v. Alexander , 96 N.C. 36 . (44)

Krites v. . Plott

222 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1943

Seawell v. Hall , 185 N.C. 80 , 82 , 116 S.E. 189 . Triplett v. … In Brown v.

Best v. . Best

228 N.C. 9 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1947

E., 822 ; Green v. Green, 131 N. C., 533 , 42 S. E., 954 ; Dowdy v. Dowdy, 154 N. C., 556 , 70 S. E., 917 ; Carnes v. Carnes, 204 N. C., 636 , 169 S. E., 222 ; Pollard v. Pollard, supra; Howell v. Howell, 223 N. … In Martin v.

Irving v. . Glazier

4 N.C. 405 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1816

The sloop received on board the lighter a load which he was hired to carry. It was not a full load for her, and she used no shifting boards. … NOTE. — On the question of average, see Ferguson v. Fitt , 2 N.C. 230 . (410)

In Re State v. . Gordon

225 N.C. 241 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1945

The court "on hearing the motion, overruled the same," and granted the motions of the Board of Education of Wake County and the Board of Education of Chatham County "for judgment on the pleadings, and on the record in the … Harrell v. Welstead , 206 N.C. 817 , 175 S.E. 283 ; Markham v. Carver , 188 N.C. 615 , 125 S.E. 409 . The case is not like S. v.

McNeill v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

167 N.C. 390 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1914

C., 245 ; Brown, J., in Allen v. R. R., ib., 340; Walker, J., in Morrow v. R. R., 147 N. C., 627 ; Brown, J., in Hammett v. R. R., 157 N. C., 322 ; Shepherd, v. R. R., 163 N. C., 518 . … To same effect are Guilford v. R. R., 154 N. C., 607 ; Hoke, J., in Edge v. R. R., 153 N. C., 212 ; Hoke, J., in Sawyer v. R. R., 145 N. C., 24 ; Arrowood v. R. R., 126 N. C., 629 ; Pickett v. R. R., 117 N. C., 616 .

Harvell v. Weldon Lumber Co.

154 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1911

. plaintiff stumbled and broke a board, the fact that the board broke and the evidence of the defendant’s witness that there were thicker boards at the mill and that the broken board was not strong enough to hold the weight … R. v. Ives, 144 U. S., 408 ; Norton v. R. R., 122 N. C., 929 . In Russell v. Town of Monroe, 116 N.

North Carolina Railroad v. Commissioners of Alamance

77 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1877

Co. v. Commissioners of Orange, 74 N. C. 506 ; R. & D. R. R. Co. v. Brogden, Ibid, 707. … Co. v. Commissioners of Alamance, 76 N. C. 212 .

PHG Asheville, LLC v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 2020

PHG Asheville, LLC v. … , the board of adjustment, or the planning board.”

Welsh v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

200 N.C. 184 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931

Burton v. Ins. Co., 198 N. C., 498 . … Burton v. Ins. Co., 198 N. C., 498 ; Welch v. Ins. Co., 196 N. C., 546 , 146 S. E., 216 ; Graham v. Ins. Co., 116 N. C., 313 , 91 S. E., 6 ; Britton v. Ins. Co., 165 N. C., 149 , 80 S. E., 1072 ; Clements v. Ins.

Rasberry v. . Hicks

199 N.C. 702 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1930

In Glenn v. Culbreth , 197 N.C. at p. 678, citing numerous authorities, it is said: "The law provided for the regular city election on the first Monday in May, 1929. … Board of Education v. Commissioners of Johnston , 198 N.C. 430 . The court will take judicial notice of the fact that the general election was held on 4 November, 1930. For the reasons given, the appeal is Dismissed.

King v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

200 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1931

The liability of the defendant in this case is governed by the opinion in Earwood v. R. R., 192 N. C., 27 , 133 S. E., 180 . See, also, McGee v. Warren, 198 N. C., 672 , 153 S. E., 162 ; Smith v. R. … Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 245 ; Rice v. R. R., 174 N. C., 268 , 93 S. E., 774 ; Hoggard v. Brown, 192 N. C., 494 , 135 S. E., 331 ; McIntosh North Carolina Practice and Procedure, p. 545.

Withers v. Black

230 N.C. 428 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1949

Lumberton, 215 N.C. 752 , 3 S.E.2d 324 ; Pickard v. Plaid Mills, 213 N.C. 28 , 195 S.E. 28 ; Holmes v. Brown Co., 207 N.C. 785 , 178 S.E. 569 ; Winberry v. Farley Stores, Inc., 204 N.C. 79 , 167 S.E. 475 ; Conrad v. … Ed.), section 1560; Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N.C. 766 , 32 S.E.2d 320 ; Conrad v. Foundry Co., supra.

Adams v. Flora Macdonald College

248 N.C. 674 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1958

Temple v. Temple, 246 N.C. 334 , 98 S.E. 2d 314 ; Baker v. Varser, 239 N.C. 180 , 79 S.E. 2d 757 ; Spaugh v. Charlotte, 239 N.C. 149 , 79 S.E. 2d 748 . … Topping v. Board of Education, post, 719, and cases there cited. In Medlin v.

In Re Claim of Duckett

271 N.C. 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 27, 1967

In State, ex Rel. v. Board of Trustees, 192 Mo. … Jenkins v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 244 N.C. 560, 565 , 94 S.E. 2d 577 . Appellant further contends that the Superior Court is bound by the Pension Board’s finding of fact.

Lochner v. Silver Sales Service, Inc.

232 N.C. 70 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1950

Garland v. Improvement Co., 184 N.C. 551 , 115 S.E. 164 . What was said in Aydlett v. Brown, 153 N.C. 334 , 69 S.E. 243 , is apropos here. … Brown v. Featherstone, 202 N.C. 569 , 163 S.E. 558 . Furthermore, no sufficient foundation was laid for the introduction of the advertisements.

Stone v. Steamship Co.

139 N.C. 193 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1905

Morehead v. Brown, 51 N. C., 367 . Furthermore, the plaintiff had been promptly notified of the arrival of the goods, and, so far as appears, had been given ample time and opportunity to remove them. … Chalk v. Railroad, 85 N. C., 423 ; Holdsclaw v. Duff, 21 Mo., 392 . No Error.

State Ex Rel. Wescott v. Thees

89 N.C. 55 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1883

This allegation was denied by the defendants; and for a further defence, they alleged that at the last meetings of the board of county commissioners, for the years 1875 and 1876, held prior to the commencement of this action … Rev., ch. 27, §5; Commissioners of Wake v. Magnin, 78 N. C., 181 and 186. No error. Affirmed.

State v. Sowell

318 N.C. 640 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1986

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in State v. … Justices Mitchell and Browning join in this dissenting opinion.

Latta v. . Vickers

82 N.C. 501 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1880

Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 . … the plaintiff when a payment in confederate money was only allowed its scaled value, or rejected, were cases arising upon notes given before the war, or the terms of the order were not complied with; or as in Wetherell v.