Opinion

King v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

  • 200 N.C. 398
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Feb 25, 1931
Status
Published
Author
Beogden
On the bench
Beogden
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.5%

The opinion

BeogdeN, J.

The liability of the defendant in this case is governed by the opinion in Earwood v. R. R., 192 N. C., 27 , 133 S. E., 180 . See, also, McGee v. Warren, 198 N. C., 672 , 153 S. E., 162 ; Smith v. R. R., ante, 177; North Carolina Law Review, December, 1930, p. 98.

The defendant insists that it was the duty of the court to submit an issue of contributory negligence in each case. Of course, issues arise upon the pleadings and must be framed accordingly. Nevertheless, the trial judge is not required to submit an issue to the jury if there is no *400 evidence to support it. Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 245 ; Rice v. R. R., 174 N. C., 268 , 93 S. E., 774 ; Hoggard v. Brown, 192 N. C., 494 , 135 S. E., 331 ; McIntosh North Carolina Practice and Procedure, p. 545.

The record discloses no evidence of contributory negligence and the ruling of the trial judge was correct.

No error.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.