Case law

Virginia Electric and Power Company v. Currie

254 N.C. 17 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1961

John Deere Plow Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, 38 Cal. 2d 214 , 238 P. 2d 569 , appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, *30 343 U.S. 939 , 96 L. … John Deere Plow Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra; Ford Motor Co. v. Beauchamp, 308 U.S. 331 , 84 L. Ed. 304 ; In the matter of The North American Cement Corporation v. Graves, 243 App.

Bigham v. . Foor

201 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1931

Brann v. Hanes, 194 N. C., 571 , 140 S. E., 292 ; Gower v. Carter, 195 N. C., 697 , 143 S. E., 513 ; S. v. Carter, 194 N. C., 293 , 139 S. E., 604 ; Roanoke Rapids v. Patterson, 184 N. C., 135 , 113 S. … E., 603 ; Hannon v. Grizzard, 89 N. C., 115 . The constitutionality of chapter 75, Public Laws 1929, was upheld in Ashley v. Brown, 198 N. C., 369 , 151 S. E., 725 . The case of White v. Lumber Co., 199 N.

City of Washington v. Bonner

203 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1932

Commissioners v. MacRae, 89 N. C., 95 ; Darnel v. Grizzard, 117 N. C., 105 , 23 S. E., 93 . … Eller v. Church, 121 N. C., 269 , 28 S. E., 364 ; Brown v. Wilson, 174 N. C., 668 , 94 S. E., 419 ; Pierce v. Faison, 183 N. C., 177 , 110 S.

In Re the Appeal of Harris

273 N.C. 20 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1968

In Allen v. … In White v.

State v. . Crumpler

88 N.C. 647 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

The verdict contains, in separate exhibits, the successive parts of the proceeding had before the board of trustees of the township within which the proposed road lies, copied from the records of the board, which were introduced … C., 481 ; State v. Patrick, 79 N. C., 655 , and State v. Reese, 83 N. C., 637 .

Den on the Several Demises Homes v. Mitchell

6 N.C. 228 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1813

Tile case of Hope on the demise of Brown and wife v. Taylor, 1 Burr, 2G8, * is an authority that settles this question. … A different construction has been sometimes put upon the very-same words, as applied to money and lands, in order to support the intent of the testator, as in the case of Forth v. Chapman, by Lord Mac-lesiield.

Windsor Bargain House v. Watson

148 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1908

In Brown v. Brown, 109 N. C., 124 , the ’Court held: “1. … And in Thigpen v. Maget, 107 N.

In re J.R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 2022

Brown, “Anything else?” Dr. … Brown responded that she had nothing more to share with the court. Respondent’s counsel then cross-examined Dr. Brown.

Sain v. Baker.

128 N.C. 256 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 14, 1901

Kornegay v. Morris, 122 N. C., 199 ; Baird v. Winstead, 123 N. C., 181 ; Watson v. Smith, 110 N. C., 6 ; Fortescue v. Satterthwaite, 23 N. C., 566 . … C., 261 , the will was of date 1786, and in Brown v. Brown, 25 N. C., 134 , the testator died in 1801.

Wood v. Nunnery

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2015

Brown Moore & Associates, PLLC, by Jon R. Moore; and White & Stradley, PLLC, by J. David Stradley, for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus curiae. … WOOD V. NUNNERY Opinion of the Court DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED. -2-

Fields v. . Bynum

156 N.C. 413 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 25, 1911

BRowN, J. 1. Tbe defendant excepted to tbe issues and tendered two others. Those submitted have been practically approved by this Court in several cases. McCurry v. McCurry, 82 N. C., 296 ; Wozelka v. Heltrick, 93 N. … The cases strongly relied upon by the learned counsel for the defendant are Aycock v. Marsh, 30 N. C., 360 , and Brown v. Hathaway, 95 Mass., 239 .

Newby & White v. Drainage District

163 N.C. 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1913

Fallbrook v. Bradley, 164 U. S., 112 ; People v. LaRue, 67 Cal., 526 . … W., 886 ; Barker v. Vernon Twp., 63 Mich., 516 ; 30 N. W., 510 ; Oliver v. Monona County, 117 Iowa, 43 ; 90 N. W., 510 ; Ithaca v. Babcock, 36 Misc., 49 ; 72 N. Y. Supp., 519 ; Jebb v. Sexton, 84 Ill.

APPEAL OF McLEAN TRUCKING COMPANY, WINSTON-SALEM

285 N.C. 552 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1974

Neither the Forsyth County Board of Commissioners nor the County Board of Equalization and Review had authority to change McLean’s 1969 tax listing from Broadbay Township to Winston Township for two reasons: (1) The Board … Gibbs v. Higgins, 215 N.C. 201 , 1 S.E. 2d 554 (1939). Accord, Walker v. Story, 256 N.C. 453 , 124 S.E. 2d 113 (1962) ; State V. Burell, 256 N.C. 288 , 123 S.E. 2d 795 (1962) ; Hayes v.

In Re Property in Forsyth County

282 N.C. 71 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1972

There was no error in the denial by the State Board of Assessment of the county's motion to dismiss the appeal by Woolworth to that Board. … In re King, 281 N.C. 533 , 189 S.E.2d 158 ; King v. Baldwin, 276 N.C. 316 , 172 S.E.2d 12 .

Bank v. . Simpson

90 N.C. 467 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Reg., 447 ; Calloway v. Snap, 78 Kent. Rep., 561. In the latter case, decided in 1880, after referring to Brown v. … In Brown v.

In re the Appeal of Strong Tire Service, Inc.

281 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1972

In reversing the State Board, Judge Exum held the provisions of G.S. 105-331 do not apply to the present factual situation. … Spiers v. Davenport, 263 N.C. 56 , 138 S.E. 2d 762 (1964), and Wolfenden v.

Taylor v. Johnston

289 N.C. 690 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 14, 1976

Cedar Company, 142 N.C. 411 , 55 S.E. 304 ; Batts v. Batts, 128 N.C. 21 , 38 S.E. 132 ; Wyman v. Taylor, 124 N.C. 426 , 32 S.E. 740 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 122 N.C. 587 , 29 S.E. 884 ; 65 Am. S. R. 725 ; Basnight v. … In Walston v. Applewhite & Co., 237 N.C. 419 , 75 S.E. 2d 138 , Justice Denny, later Chief Justice, speaking for the Court, reaffirmed the rule stated in Board of Education v.

State v. Tucker

317 N.C. 532 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 12, 1986

State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237, 248-49 , 321 S.E. 2d 856, 861 (1984). … State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237 , 321 S.E. 2d 856 , strongly supports the proposition that the erroneous jury instructions in this case constituted plain error.

In Re the Appeal of Morris U.S.A.

335 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1993

The Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners approved the contract on 16 January 1989. … State v. Whittle Communications, 328 N.C. 456, 470 , 402 S.E.2d 556, 564 , reh’g denied, 328 N.C. 735 , 404 S.E.2d 878 (1991) (quoting Gardner v.

Revels v. Oxendine

263 N.C. 510 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1965

‘So, ex necessitate the court may, on plea, suggestion, motion, or ex mero motu,. where the defect of jurisdiction is apparent, stop the proceeding.’ ” Burgess v. Gibbs, 262 N.C. 462 , 137 S.E. 2d 806 . … G.S. 115-27 provides: “The board of education of each county . . . shall be a body corporate . . . capable of . . . prosecuting and defending suits for or against the corporation.” See Fields v.