Opinion

Wood v. Nunnery

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Apr 10, 2015
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 100PA14

FILED 10 April 2015

TERRY WAYNE WOOD

v.

JEREMY NUNNERY, NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL

INSURANCE COMPANY, and FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF

WASHINGTON, D.C.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous,

unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 757 S.E.2d 526

(2014), affirming an order entered on 11 February 2013 by Judge Edwin G. Wilson,

Jr. in Superior Court, Forsyth County. On 11 June 2014, the Supreme Court allowed

plaintiff’s conditional petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard

in the Supreme Court on 12 January 2015.

Maynard & Harris, Attorneys at Law, PLLC, by C. Douglas Maynard, Jr., for

plaintiff-appellant/appellee.

Van Laningham Duncan PLLC, by L. Cooper Harrell; Smith Moore

Leatherwood LLP, by James G. Exum, Jr.; and Bennett & Guthrie, PLLC, by

Rodney A. Guthrie and Roberta King Latham, for defendant-

appellant/appellee Jeremy Nunnery.

Brown Moore & Associates, PLLC, by Jon R. Moore; and White & Stradley,

PLLC, by J. David Stradley, for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus

curiae.

Pinto Coates Kyre & Bowers, PLLC, by Deborah J. Bowers, for North Carolina

Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

WOOD V. NUNNERY

Opinion of the Court

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

-2-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.