Case law

Kornegay v. City of Goldsboro

180 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1920

Johnson v. Board of Education, 166 N. C., 472 . … D., 518; Memphis v. Brown, 16 Fed. Cases, No. 9415.

Stansbury v. . Guilford County

226 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1946

The challenge is solely to the authority of the Board of Commissioners of Guilford County to pay the plaintiff more than the $1,800.00 authorized by chapter 427, Public-Local Laws of 1927. Kendall v. Stafford, 178 N. … Hill v. Stansbury, supra; Reed v. Madison, 213 N. C., 145 , 195 S. E., 620 ; Carolina Beach v. Mintz, 212 N. C., 578 , 194 S. E., 309 ; Commissioners of Brunswick v. Walker, 203 N. C., 505, 166 S. E., 385 ; Kendall v.

Willard v. Huffman

250 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1959

In light of the rulings in Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board-, 353 U.S. 1 , 1 L. Ed. 2d 601 , Amalgamated M.eat Gutters v. Fairlawn Meats, 353 U.S. 20 , 1 L. … See Section 160 (a), Title 29, USCA, and Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, supra. In view of what was said in Local Union No. 10, A. F. of L. v. Graham, supra; United Const. Workers, et al v. Laburnum Const.

Walker v. Moss

246 N.C. 196 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1957

tenus challenges the complaint upon ‘the ground that it fails to state a cause of action for that the General Assembly of North Carolina under the mandatory provision of the statute is required to appoint members of county boards … As provided in G.S. 115-19, the General Assembly on 27 March, 1957, ratified an Act appointing boards of education for the designated counties of the State, including Halifax.

Mack v. Marshall Field & Co.

217 N.C. 55 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1940

In McCarley v. Council, 205 N. C., 370 (374), speaking to the subject, it is said: “In Brown v. R. R., 202 N. C., 256 , 162 S. … See Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 668 , 169 S. E., 419 . It was approved in Phifer v. Berry, 202 N. C., 388, 163 S. E., 119 , and may now be regarded as settled,” citing *61 Pridgen and U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. A.

First National Bank v. Warlick

125 N.C. 593 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1899

The order was not approved in a regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners. Cotton Mills v. Commissioners, 108 N. C., 678 . … Bank v. Bradley, 117 N. C., 526 .

State v. . Hay

49 L.R.A. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1900

Sutton v. Phillips , 116 N.C. 502 ; White v. Murray, ante , 153. … Cited: Hutchins v. Durham , 137 N.C. 971 ; Durham v. Cotton Mills , 141 N.C. 645 ; Morgan v. Stewart , 144 N.C. 428 . *Page 652 (1007)

Porter v. Suburban Sanitation Service, Inc.

283 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1973

Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155, 162 , 166 S.E. 2d 78 ; Efird v. Comrs. of Forsyth, 219 N.C. 96 , 12 S.E. 2d 889 ; Tyrrell County v. Holloway, 182 N.C. 64 , 108 S.E. 337 . … See: City of Indianapolis v. Ryan, 212 Ind. 447 , 7 N.E. 2d 974 ; O’Neal v. Harrison, 96 Kansas 339, 150 P. 551 ; Wheeler v. Boston, 233 Mass. 275 , 123 N.E. 684 ; Board of Health of Grand Rapids v.

J. E. Latham Co. v. Rogers

170 N.C. 239 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1915

BrowN, J. … Bank v. Fountain, 148 N. C., 590 ; Bank v. Exum, 163 N. C., 203 . Bank v. Brown, 160 N.

State v. . Barbee

187 N.C. 703 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 14, 1924

Minton v. Early, 183 N. C., 200 ; S. v. McRae, 170 N. C., 712 ; S. v. Griffin, 154 N. C., 611 ; S. v. Williams, 150 N. C., 802 ; Bailey v. State of Alabama, 219 U. S., 219 . … And in S. v.

Sanders v. . Hamilton

229 N.C. 43 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1948

Brown v. Osteen, 197 N. C., 305 , 148 S. E., 434 ; Meadows Co. v. Bryan, 195 N. C., 398 , 142 S. E., 487 ; Walter v. Kilpatrick, 191 N. C., 458 , 132 S. E., 148 ; Miller v. Marriner, 187 N. C., 449 , 121 S. … Brown v. Osteen, supra; Meadows Co. v. Bryan, supra; Walter v. Kilpatrick, supra; Dry-Kiln Co. v. Ellington, 172 N. C., 481 , 90 S. E., 564 ; 34 A. L. R., 897.

Forte v. . Boone

114 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

Allen v. Strickland, 100 N. C., 225 ; State v. Johnson, 109 N. C., 852 ; Clark v. Manufacturing Co., 110 N. C., 111 ; The Code, §597. … Maggett v. Roberts, 108 N. C., 174 . It inight have even been allowed after verdict {Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347 ), or, indeed, in this Court. Hodge *178 v. Railroad, 108 N. C., 24, 26 ; Grant v. Rogers, 94 N.

Williams v. . Johnson

228 N.C. 732 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1948

Moore v. Baker, 224 N. C., 133 , 29 S. E. (2d), 452 ; Williamson v. Cox, 218 N. C., 177 , 10 S. E. (2d), 662 ; Edwards v. Faulkner, 215 N. C., 586 , 2 S. E. (2d), 703 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 207 N. C., 132 , 176 S. … E., 258 ; Fields v. Rollins, 186 N. C., 221 , 119 S. E., 207 ; Wallace v. Wallace, 181 N. C., 158 , 106 S. E., 501 ; Jones v. Whichard, 163 N. C., 241 , 79 S. E., 503 ; Puckett v. Morgan, 158 N. C., 344 , 74 S. E., 15 .

Brinson v. . Lacy

195 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1928

Walker, J., in Jones v. Williams, 155 N. C., 179 . Also in Culbreth v. Hall, 159 N. … Collingwood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 362 ; Bird v. Gilliam, 125 N. C., 76 ; Morgan v. Bostic, 132 N. C., 751 . C.

Fulford v. Jenkins

363 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 2009

FULFORD Jr., Executor for the Estate of Mary Fulford v. Antonio Javon JENKINS; County of Duplin; Duplin County Department of Social Services; Millie I. … Brown, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Director of Duplin County Department of Social Services; de Wana Kenan, Individually and in her Official Capacity as a Social Worker with the Duplin County Department of

City of Greensboro v. Simpson

188 N.C. 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1924

The fund arising from the sale is to be turned over to the proper authorities and used for public purposes, as the board of education of Greensboro may determine, presumably for school purposes. Blue v. … C., 321 ; Harris v. Durham, 185 N. C., 572 ; Torrence v. Charlotte, 163 N. C., 562 ; Venable v. School Comrs., 149 N. C., 120 .

Gordon v. Thomasville Chair Co.

205 N.C. 739 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1934

We think the facts of this case come within the decision of Bellamy v. Mfg. Co., 200 N. C., 676 . In that ease, after citing numerous authorities, at page 679, is the following: In N. C. R. R. Co. v. Zachary, 232 U. S. … The case of Beavers v. Power Co., ante, 34. “The Photographer case” is easily distinguishable. The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

Chesnutt v. Peters

300 N.C. 359 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1980

of the Board’s evidence. … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E. 2d 538, 541 (1977).

Hancock v. Commissioners of Craven County

132 N.C. 209 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1903

The board removed me February 1st, 1899, and employed D. L. Ward. I received $50. The board revoked resolution *211 of December 5th. I offered to perform the services and the board refused to have me. … We think that the board had the power to make the contract for the term of two years that being the term for which it was elected. Roper v. Town of Laurinburg, 90 N. C., 427 .

Cox v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

148 N.C. 459 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1908

BROWN, • J. … Sears v. Whitaker, 136 N. C., 37 ; Appenheimer v. Railroad, 64 Ark., 27; 26 Am. and Eng. Enc. (2d Ed.), p. 658.