Case law

Stewart v. . Wyrick

228 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1947

Nesbitt v. Donoho, 198 N. C., 147 , 150 S. E., 875 ; Brown v. Williams, 196 N. C., 247 , 145 S. E., 233 . … Helsabeck v. Doub, 167 N. C., 205 , 83 S. E., 241 ; Freeman v. Brown, 151 N. C., 111 , 65 S. E., 743 ; Miller v. Lash, supra. Whether the plaintiff might have sued for anticipatory breach when J. G.

Glisson v. . Hill

55 N.C. 256 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1855

Sowell v. Barrett, Busb. Eq. Rep. 50; Brown v. Carson, Ibid 272; Clement v. Clement, 1 Jones’ Eq. Rep. 184; Briggs v. Morris, Ibid 193; Lamb v. Pigford, Ibid 195; Taylor v. Taylor, Ibid 246. … The latter cannot of itself avail much, (see Brown v.

Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Commissioners of Alamance

84 N.C. 504 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1881

The cases cited in the brief are but in confirmation of this view. *507 Makepeace ex parte, 9 Ired. 91 ; Bryan v. Lawrence, 5 Jones, 337 ; Latham v. Blakely, 70 N. C., 368 ; Bond v. Coke, 71 N. C., 97 ; Deal v. … of the board.

Taylor v. . Taylor

76 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1877

On the ■other hand, Coble v. … In the two last named cases the charges were held sufficient under the statute and a divorce from bed and board was decided. The decisions of the Court in Coble v. Coble and Erwin v.

Jenkins v. City Coach Co.

231 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 30, 1949

Brown v. Truck Lines, 229 N.C. 122 , 47 S.E. 2d 711 . Moreover, it compels the conclusion that he was keeping a vigilant lookout for vehicles approaching from the opposite direction. … He has the right to assume under such circumstances that the approaching automobile will remain on its own side of the road until the vehicles meet and pass in safety, Brown v.

Plemmons v. Cutshall

234 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1951

See Clegg v. Canady, 217 N.C. 433 , 8 S.E. 2d 246 ; Huffman v. Pearson, 222 N.C. 193 , 22 S.E. 2d 440 , and cases cited. See also Brown v. Hodges, 232 N.C. 537 , 61 S.E. 2d 603 . … See Cornelison v. Hammond, supra, where the subject has been fully discussed and applied in opinion by Barnhill, J. See also Brown v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 746 , 55 S.E. 2d 498 .

State v. . Mangum

187 N.C. 477 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 26, 1924

S. v. Dixon, 114 N. C., 850 ; S. v. Lilly, 116 N. C., 1049 ; S. v. Reams, 121 N. C., 556 ; S. v. Brown, 125 N. C., 704 ; S. v. Woodlief, 172 N. C., 887 . … C., 748 ; S. v. Brown, 125 N. C., 704 . The above cases show that one of the mischiefs intended to be remedied is the practice of carrying concealed weapons, to be used on an emergency. Justice Ashe said, in S. v.

Allen v. Mutual Life Insurance

211 N.C. 736 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1937

Jackson v. Trust Co., ante, 733; Brown v. Assurance Society, 210 N. C., 825 ; S. v. Swan, 209 N. C., 836 , 183 S. E., 285 ; Sessoms v. R. R., 208 N. C., 844 , 182 S. E., 112 ; Beam v. Pub. Co., ibid., 837, 181 S. … E., 326 ; Trust Co. v. Hood, Comr., 207 N. C., 862 , 177 S. E., 16 ; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840 , 161 S. E., 223 . Affirmed.

McArthur v. . McEachin

64 N.C. 454 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1870

The remedy of such a party can be obtained in the Superior Court on an appeal, or by writ of certiorari: State v. Jacobs, Bus. 218; Bledsoe v. Snow, 3 Jon. 99. … The plaintiffs.in this action seek to rescind an order made by the Board of Commissioners in the exercise of their legitimate authority, and also to restrain, by injunction, an officer duly appointed by said Board, from discharging

Paschal v. Johnson

183 N.C. 129 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1922

Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N. C., 143 ; Constitution, Art. VII, sec. 7. … II, sec. 29, prohibiting the incorporation of new school districts by special enactment, as shown in Trustees v. Trust Co., 181 N. C., 306 ; Sechrist v. Comrs., 181 N. C., 511 .

Gwinn v. . Parker

119 N.C. 19 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Code, Sec. 274; Gilchrist v. Kitchen, 86 N. C., 20 ; Brown v. Hale, 93 N. C., 188 . No Error.

AMERICAN EQUITABLE ASSURANCE CO. OF NY v. Gold

248 N.C. 288 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1958

Newman v. Watkins, supra [ 208 N.C. 675 , 182 S.E. 453 ] and cases cited; Hood ex rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Richardson Realty, Inc., supra [ 211 N.C. 582 , 191 S.E. 410 ] also, see Amick v. … Turner v. City of Reidsville, 224 N.C. 42, 46 , 29 S.E.2d 211, 214 ; State v. Lueders, 214 N.C. 558 , 200 S.E. 22 ." Fox v. Board of Com'rs for the County of Durham, 244 N.C. 497, 500 , 94 S.E.2d 482, 485 .

Burton v. . Styers

210 N.C. 230 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1936

Gray v. Cooper, 65 N. C., 183 . And in March v. Verble, 79 N. … The holding in Brown v. Adams, 174 N. C., 490 , is not in conflict with this view.

Den on Demise of Strother v. Cathey

5 N.C. 162 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1807

Cited: Tyrell v. Mooney, post , 404; Stanmire v. Powell , 35 N.C. 315 ; Lovingood v. Burgess , 44 N.C. 408 ; Barnett v. Woods , 58 N.C. 433 ; Dugger v. McKesson , 100 N.C. 11 ; Brown v. … Brown , 103 N.C. 219 , 20, 21; Gilchrist v. Middleton , 107 N.C. 679 ; Wool v. Saunders , 108 N.C. 736 ; Bd. of Education v. Makely , 139 N.C. 37 ; Frazier v. Cherokee Indians , 146 N.C. 481 .

Baker v. . Edge

174 N.C. 100 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1917

Allbright v. Allbright, 172 N. C., 353 . The Courts are also averse to the revocation of a will by implication, and, as said in Hallyburton v. Carson, 86 N. … He gave an undivided half of the Euffin tract to each, and in the codicil he gave John the Brown tract in lieu of an undivided half of the Euffin tract.

State v. Walker

662 S.E.2d 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

662 S.E.2d 392 (2008) STATE of North Carolina v. Jason Christopher WALKER and Emit E. Browning, Jr. and Javier A. Hernandez, Jr. No. 16P05-3. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 10, 2008. Robert C. … Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Browning. Daniel L. Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Walker. Geoffrey W. Hosford, Wilmington, for Hernandez. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 722 .

State v. Bowden

367 N.C. 329 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2014

Def’s Motion to Take Judicial Notice of the Files of This Court in the Case of Brown v. N.C. Department of Correction 2. Def’s Motion to Take Judicial Notice of the Files of this Court in the Case of Jones v. Keller 1.

State v. Shook

327 N.C. 74 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 26, 1990

It is time to return to the rule which was in effect before Brown . I believe that prior to Brown the rule for making confessions admissible was well established in the following cases, State v. … State v. Trexler, 316 N.C. at 533 , 342 S.E.2d at 881 . *827 Although we used the pre- Brown test in Trexler , we said we were using the Brown test. In State v.

State v. Casey

201 N.C. 185 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 27, 1931

S. v. Utley, supra; S. v. Blackwelder, 182 N. C., 899 .” … S. v. Green, 92 N. C., at p. 782; S. v. Stratford, 149 N. C., 483 ; S. v. Wilkins, 158 N. C., 603 ; S. v. Lawrence, 196 N. C., at p. 565.

Powell v. . Bladen County

206 N.C. 46 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1934

Wilkinson v. Board of Education, 199 N. C., 669 ; Lacy v. Bank, 183 N. C., 373 . … Comr. of Revenue v. Realty Co., 204 N. C., 123 ; S. v. Harris, ibid., 422; Rutledge v. Fitzgerald, 197 N. C., 163 . Judgment Affirmed.