Opinion

Gwinn v. . Parker

  • 119 N.C. 19
  • 25 S.E. 705
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Sep 5, 1896
Status
Published
Author
EaiRcloth
On the bench
EaiRcloth
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 89.9%

The opinion

EaiRcloth, C. J.:

The plaintiff, having previously filed a complaint, on Thursday, Spring Term, 1896, obtained judgment for want of an answer. On the next day the Judge, on defendants’ affidavit and application, set aside the judgment and allowed defendants 30 days to answer. Plaintiff appealed.

It has been the settled rule for some time that any order or decree made was, during the term,

in fieri,

and that the Court during the term could vacate or modify the same.

The Court has the discretion also, not reviewable, to extend the time for filing pleadings.

Code,

Sec. 274;

Gilchrist

v.

Kitchen,

86 N. C., 20 ;

Brown

v.

Hale,

93 N. C., 188 . No Error.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.