Case law

Lambeth v. Southern Power Co.

152 N.C. 371 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1910

Brown, J. Tbe exceptions to the evidence are, in our opinion, without merit. Tbe defendant could not be permitted to show the' increased value of tbe land a year or more after defendant’s line was constructed. … Dom. (2 Ed.), 478-462; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 ; Abernethy v. R. R., 150 N. C., 97 ; 15 Cyc., 684. No error.

Ritchie v. . Ritchie

192 N.C. 538 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1926

Brown v. Morris, 83 N. C., 251 ; Simpson v. R. R., 112 N. C., 703 ; McCurry v. Purgason, 170 N. C., 463 . … Williams v. Hughes, 139 N. C., 17 ; Waldo v. Wilson, 177 N. C., 461 . In S. v. Horn, 119 N.

State v. Odom

307 N.C. 655 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1983

State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 41, 50 , 265 S.E. 2d 191, 197 (1980). However, that rule was recently altered by an amendment to the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. … He then boarded a bus for New York when his wife told him “they” were going to kill him.

Rook v. . Horton

190 N.C. 180 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1925

Defendant asserts that, under tbe rule announced in Brown v. Morisey, 124 N. C., 296 , adverse possession during tbe coverture will, bar dower. Tbe first vital difference between Brown v. … However, in Brown v. Morisey, supra, there were two dissents and one concurring opinion. Brown v. Morisey, 126 N.

Guthrie v. Taylor

279 N.C. 703 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1971

City of Charlotte, 273 N.C. 293 , 160 S.E. 2d 18 ; Motley *714 v. Board of Barber Examiners, 228 N.C. 337 , 45 S.E. 2d 550 , 175 A.L.R. 253 ; State v. Trantham, 230 N.C. 641 , 55 S.E. 2d 198 . … Cheek v. City of Charlotte, supra; State v. Trantham, supra.

In Re the Assessment of Additional Sales & Use Taxes Against Halifax Paper Co.

259 N.C. 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963

Power Co. v. Bowles, 229 N.C. 143 , 48 S.E. 2d 287 ; McLean v. Board of Elections, 222 N.C. 6 , 21 S.E. 2d 842 . … Cab Co. v.. Charlotte, supra.

Fuller v. . Lockhart

209 N.C. 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1935

Lacy v. Bank, 183 N. C., 373 ; Lovelace v. Pratt, 187 N. C., 686 ; Frazier v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 49 ; Hall v. Commissioners of Duplin, 194 N. C., 768 .” Elliott v. Board of Equalization, 203 N. C., 749 . … Clark v. McQueen, 195 N. C., 714 (716); Crabtree v. Board of Education, 199 N. C., 645 (650).

State v. Harris

290 N.C. 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1976

The substance of defendant’s statement was that defendant, Phyllis Brown and David Briggs planned to rob Mr. … This instruction required the jury to determine whether or not Phyllis Brown as an accomplice.

Fleming v. . Congleton

177 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1919

Mason v. Durham, 175 N. C., 641 , approved in Keener v. Asheville, ante, 1. … Whittier v. Collins, 15 R. I., 90; Bacon v. Moody, 117 Ga., 207 ; Austen v. Decker, 109 Iowa, 109 ; Black v. Miller, 75 Mich., 323 .”

State v. Hopper

186 N.C. 405 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1923

C., 826 ; *411 S. v. Ferguson, 107 N. C., 841 . See cases cited in S. v. Johnson, 182 N. C., 888 . Hardin v. Davis, 183 N. C., 47 . Walker, J., in S. v. … This kind, of testimony was objected to in S. v. O’Higgins, supra, and Brown, J., said: “The evidence that the defendant abandoned his motherless children in order to elope with Mrs.

Charlotte Park & Recreation Commission v. Barringer

242 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1955

In Brown v. … Collette v. Town of Charlotte, supra; First Universalist Society v. Boland, supra; Brown v. Independent Baptist Church of Woburn, supra; Copenhaver v.

Lowman v. City of Asheville

229 N.C. 247 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1948

Brown v. Hall, 226 N. C., 732 , 40 S.E. (2d), 412 ; Cody v. Hovey, 219 N. C., 369 , 14 S. E. (2d), 30 ; Wolf v. Goldstein, 192 N. C., 818 , 135 S. E., 39 ; Hensley v. Furniture Co., 164 N. C., 148 , 80 S. E., 154 . … Cody v. Iiovey, supra: Brown v. Hall, supra. Even so, we know of no reason wiry the defendant, if it so desires, may not apply for a bill of particulars, as provided in G. S., 1-150. Building Co. v. Jones, 227 N.

State v. Matias

354 N.C. 549 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2001

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984). “[I]n a prosecution for possession of contraband materials, the prosecution is not required to prove actual physical possession of the materials.” State v. … Davis, 325 N.C. at 697 , 386 S.E.2d at 190 ; sée also Brown, 310 N.C. at 569 , 313 S.E.2d at 588-89 .

Commissioners v. . Trust Co.

143 N.C. 110 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1906

State v. Deliesseline, 10 S. C., 52. … State v. McBride, 4 Mo., 308 . See also Stanford v. Ellington, 77 N. C., 255.

Dixon v. . Pender

188 N.C. 792 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1924

Brown, and bad several children born of tbe marriage, and defendants, since tbe death of Annie Brown, their mother, are and have been in possession of tbe property under decrees of court and deeds by virtue of which they … Allen v. Parker, supra; Noble v. Williams, 167 N. C., p. 112; Poisson v. Pettaway, 159 N. C., p. 650; Watson v. Sullivan, 153 N. C., p. 246; Paul v. Carter, 153 N. C., p. 26; Little v. Buie, 58 N. C., p. 10; Dozier v.

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Gray

121 N.C. 168 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

.: The plaintiff, through its agent Brown, delivered to the defendant a sewing machine, under a written contract, which plaintiff calls a lease on the instalment plan — so much to be paid at the time of delivery and then … C., 377 ; Crinkley v. Egerton, 113 N. C., 444 ; Clark v. Hill, 117 N. C., 11 ; Barrington v. Skinner, Ibid, 47; and would be a conditional sale.

Speck v. North Carolina Dairy Foundation, Inc.

311 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 1984

Flippin v. Jarrell, 301 N.C. 108 , 270 S.E. 2d 482 (1980). … E.g., Vigitron, Inc. v. Ferguson, 419 A. 2d 1115 (N.H. 1980); Amoco Production Co. v. Lindley, 609 P. 2d 733 (Okla. 1980); Whites’ Electronics, Inc. v. Teknetics, Inc., 677 P. 2d 68 (Or. App. 1984); Stevens v.

State v. Hunt

330 N.C. 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1991

State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 58 , 337 S.E.2d 808, 822 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1165 , 90 L.Ed.2d 733 (1986). … State v. Brown, 315 N.C. at 58 , 337 S.E.2d at 822 . In this case, there was sufficient evidence that the killing was premeditated and deliberate.

Blount v. Taft

295 N.C. 472 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 29, 1978

Wilson v. McClenny, 262 N.C. 121, 129 , 136 S.E. 2d 569, 575 (1964). Accord, Stein v. Capital Outdoor Adv., Inc., supra. … Yates v. Brown, 275 N.C. 634, 640 , 170 S.E. 2d 477, 482 (1969). Here Section 7 and Section 4 were unanimously incorporated into the bylaws at the same time.

State v. McLaurin

320 N.C. 143 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1987

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 569 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 589 (1984). Cf. State v. … Brown, 310 N.C. at 566 , 313 S.E. 2d at 587 .