Case law

McRae v. . Commissioners of New Hanover

74 N.C. 415 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

Morningstar Marinas/Eaton Ferry, LLC v. Warren County

368 N.C. 360 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2015

MORNINGSTAR MARINAS/EATON FERRY, LLC V. … Board.

Commissioners v. Stafford.

138 N.C. 453 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1905

Glenn v. Wray, 126 N. C., 730 ; Brown v. Stewart, 134 N. C., 357 . … We said in Brown v.

Stubblefield v. Watson Electrical Construction Company

277 N.C. 444 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1970

Clark v. Burton Lines, *447 supra; Allred v. Allred-Gardner, Inc., 253 N.C. 554 , 117 S.E. 2d 476 ; Bolling v. Belk-White Co., 228 N.C. 749 , 46 S.E. 2d 838 ; Howell v. Fuel Co., supra; Brown v. … Henry v. Leather Co., 231 N.C. 477 , 57 S.E. 2d 760 ; Brown v. Aluminum Co., supra. Affirmed.

State v. . Nash

109 N.C. 822 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

Andrews v Whisnant, 83 N. C., 446 ; Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 127 . But in criminal actions it is otherwise. … Martin v. Chasteen, 75 N. C., 96 ; Andrews v. Whisnant , and Bailey v. Brown, supra.

Markham v. . Manning

96 N.C. 132 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

This action, resting substantially upon the same facts, differs from the case of Duke v. … Brown, and requires the same disposition to be made of it. After this ruling, preceded by the decisions in Puett v. Commissioners, 94 N. C., 709 ; and Riggsbee v.

Wilson v. . Farmer

211 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1937

For the reasons given, in Reed v. Wm. V. Farmer, Chairman of Board of County Commissioners of Madison County, ante, 249, the judgment in this cause is Reversed.

East Carolina Lumber Company v. West

247 N.C. 699 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1958

Moore v. Humphrey, 247 N.C. 423 ; Mills v. Richardson, 240 N.C. 187 ; Powell v. Turpin, 224 N.C. 67 , 29 S.E. 2d 26 ; Dunn v. Wilson, 210 N.C. 493 , 187 S.E. 802 ; Clark v. Homes, 189 N.C. 703 , 128 S.E. 20 ; Carter v. … Williams v. Trammell, 230 N.C. 575 , 55 S.E. 2d 81 ; Starnes v. Thompson, 173 N.C. 466 , 92 S.E. 259 ; Settle v. Settle, 141 N.C. 553 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N.C. 700 ; 49 C.J.S. 838-9.

Nance v. . Powell

39 N.C. 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1846

Doran v. Simpson, 4 Ves. 665. Troughton v. Binks, 6 Ves. 572. Alsager v. Rowley, Idem. 748. … Benfield v. Solomons, 9 Ves. 77, 86. Dameron v. Clay, 2 Dev. Eq. 17 .

Application of Ellis

277 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1970

It is granted by the board, after a public hearing, upon a finding that the specified conditions have been satisfied. Stacy v. Montgomery County, 239 Md. 189 , 210 A. 2d 540 ; Kraemer v. … Zoning Board of Review of the City of Warwick, 98 R.I. 328 , 201 A. 2d 643 ; Tustin Heights Ass’n v. Board of Supervisors, 170 Cal.

Rucker v. . Snider Brothers, Inc.

210 N.C. 777 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1936

Moses v. Morganton, 192 N. C., *778 102; Crisp v. Fibre Co., 193 N. C., 77 ; Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 25 ; Trust Co. v. R. R., 209 N. C., 304 ; R. R. v. Dixon, 179 U. S., 131 . … Tbe facts alleged in tbe instant case are distinguishable from those on which the decision in Brown v. R. R., supra, was based.

County of Mecklenburg v. Sterchi Bros. Stores, Inc.

210 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1936

Ed., 174 ; Bristol v. Washington County, 177 U. S., 133 , 44 L. Ed., 701 ; State Board of Assessors v. Comptoir National D’Escompte, 191 U. S., 388, 48 L. Ed., 232 ; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. New Orleans, 205 U. … At page 218 it is said: “New Orleans v. Stempel, supra, Bristol v. Washington County, supra, and Liverpool & L. & G. Ins. Co. v. Board of Assessors, 221 U. S., 346 , 55 L.

Byers v. . Byers

223 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1943

Reynolds v. Reynolds , 208 N.C. 428 , 181 S.E. 338 ; Brown v. Brown , 213 N.C. 347 , 196 S.E. 333 ; Hyder v. Hyder , 215 N.C. 239 , 1 S.E.2d 540 . … Medlin v. Medlin , 175 N.C. 529 , 95 S.E. 857 ; Brown v. Brown , 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 ; Price v. Edwards , 178 N.C. 493 , 101 S.E. 33 ; 30 Am.Jur., 925.

State v. Allen

317 N.C. 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1986

State v. Allen, 74 N.C. App. at 453, 328 S.E. 2d at 617. … We begin with State v. Thompson, 297 N.C. 285 , 254 S.E. 2d 526 (1979).

Parks-Belk Co. v. City of Concord

194 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 25, 1927

Snider v. High Point, 168 N. c., 608; Harrington v. Greenville, 159 N. C., 632 ; McIlhenny v. Wilmington, 127 N. C., 146 ; Moffit v. Asheville, 103 N. C., 237 ; White v. Comrs., 90 N. C., 437 . … Leary v. Comrs., 172 N. C., 25 ; So. Assembly v. Palmer, 166 N. C., 75 ; Comrs. v. Webb, 160 N. C., 594 .” In Scales v. Winston-Salem, 189 N.

Headman v. . Commissioners

177 N.C. 262 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1919

Not longer than the last *Page 284 term of this Court it was said by Justice Brown in Yates v. Dixie Fire Ins. … S. c. , 143 N.C. 384 ; Eames v. Armstrong , 146 N.C. 6 ; Warren v. Williford , 148 N.C. 479 ; Rexford v. Phillips , 159 N.C. 213 ; Board of Education v. Remick , 160 N.C. 563 ; McNair v. Boyd , 163 N.C. 478 .

State v. Stevens

252 N.C. 331 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1960

S. v. Shepherd, 230 N.C. 605 , 55 S.E. 2d 79 ; S. v. Crump, 209 N.C. 52 , 182 S. E. 716 . Moreover, the law does not sanction a conditional plea of nolo con-tendere. S. v. Horne, 234 N.C. 115 , 66 S.E. 2d 665 ; S. v. … The defendants contend that the judgments are void; that the law prescribes a sentence not in excess of twelve months for larceny from the person, citing S. v. Brown, 150 N.C. 867 , 64 S.E. 775 .

State v. Cobb

Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 2022

STATE V. … v.

Baber v. Hanie

163 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1913

Voorhees v. Porter, 134 N. C., 591 ; Knight v. Houghtalling, 85 N. C., 17 ; Council v. Bailey, 154 N. C., 54 ; Silk Co. v. … In our case, Miss Brown could hold Mrs.

Speagle v. Seitz

354 N.C. 525 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2001

Simpson v. Brown, 67 Cal. App. 4th 914, 925-26 , 79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 389, 395 (1998). The relevance of this type of evidence in child custody cases is clear, and such evidence is paramount. … According to Varney’s testimony, Delon hid in the bathroom with a .45-caliber pistol in hand until he realized it was Brown. Delon then stated to Brown, “You almost got f—ing shot.”