Opinion

State v. . Nash

  • 109 N.C. 822
  • 13 S.E. 733
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Sep 5, 1891
Status
Published
Author
Clark
On the bench
Clark
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 88.7%

The opinion

Clark, J.:

The defendant, who did not appeal in

forma pauperis,

but has executed his appeal bond, refused to pay the costs of the transcript of the record on appeal. The Clerk

*823

thereupon declined to send itup. The application for

certiorari

therefore presents the question whether, in criminal actions, the Clerk can require the cost of the transcript to be paid in advance. It is settled that in civil cases he can.

Andrews

v

Whisnant,

83 N. C., 446 ;

Bailey

v.

Brown,

105 N. C., 127 .

But in criminal actions it is otherwise.

The Code,

§ 3758, provides, “ No officer shall be compelled to perform any services unless his fee be paid or tendered,

except in criminal actions.”

This inhibition against requiring payment of fees in advance in criminal actions, we think, embraces all services, including that in question.

We are strengthened in this view by the fact that it has been held that the appeal bond secures only the costs of the appellee, and not of the appellant.

Morris

v.

Morris,

92 N. C., 142 , and cases cited, and, hence, when such bond is dispensed with in civil cases, by leave to appeal in

forma pau-peris,

the appellant may still be required by the Clerk to pay for the cost of the transcript on appeal and his cost in this Court as well.

Martin

v.

Chasteen,

75 N. C., 96 ;

Andrews

v.

Whisnant ,

and

Bailey

v.

Brown, supra.

The reason of this distinction is that section 212, allowing a party to

sue

as a pauper, exempts him from paying fees to any officer, but section 553, allowing an

appeal informa pau-peris,

is more restricted, and only exempts the appellant from-giving bond to secure the appellee’s costs, leaving him to pay his own costs, if exacted, if he chooses to appeal to another tribunal after having, had gratuitous services from all officers in the lower Courts.

If the same rule prevailed in criminal actions, it would follow that all appellants in such cases, as well as those appealing

in forma pauperis as others,

would be compelled to prepay the costs of the transcript and the costs in this Court, if demanded. Such is not our understanding of the statute.

The Code,

§ 3758.

An instahter

certiorari

should issue to bring up the transcript. Motion allowed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.