Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoed

4,318 results

4.93s

  • Fendler v. Saul

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 11, 2020

    Dolph v. … See Brown v. Colvin, No. 15- 3528-CV-S-REL-SSA, 2016 WL 7013482, at *19 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 30, 2016). Her letter of May 2018 did precisely that and included specific functional limitations to support her opinion.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Krumm v. Kittrich Corporation

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 17, 2019

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco Cty., 137 S. Ct. 1773, 1780 (2017) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915 (2011)). … Ill. 2018); Morgan v. U.S. Xpress, Inc., No. 3:17-CV-00085, 2018 WL 3580775, at *5 (W.D. Va. July 25, 2018); Knotts v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., 346 F. Supp. 3d 1310 (D. Minn. 2018); Becker v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bradley v. Saul

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 5, 2020

    Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 584, 591 (8th Cir. 2004); 20 C.F.R. § 416.920(a)(4)(v). … Brown v. Astrue, 611 F.3d 941, 955 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting Brace v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 2009)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Physicians Home Health Infusion, P.C. v. UnitedHealthcare of the Midwest, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 2019

    Landis v. North Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Contracting Nw., Inc. v. … Nken v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bartee v. Progressive Advanced Insurance Company

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 30, 2025

    See, e.g., Jones v. Progressive Universal. Ins. Co., 2:22-cv-00364, 2024 WL 1254352, at *11 (E.D. Wis. March 25, 2024) (excluding Kirk Felix’s expert testimony only in part and denying all other motions); Brown v. … Mastrobuono v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Flenoid v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 4, 2023

    Brown, 915 F.3d 1200, 1201 (8th Cir. 2019); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) (“Before a second or successive application permitted by this section is filed in the district court, the applicant shall move in the appropriate … See Sun Bear v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jones v. St. Louis County, Missouri

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 11, 2023

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … See U.S. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hall v. Berryhill

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 10, 2019

    See Jones v. Sullivan, 954 F.2d 125, 129 (3d Cir. 1991). treating board certified psychiatric nurse practitioner, and Dr. … Cruze v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Leslie v. Bisignano

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 29, 2025

    on the testimony of a vocational expert, the ALJ found that there exist jobs in significant numbers in the national economy that Plaintiff can perform, including representative occupations such as order clerk, circuit board … See, e.g., Hensley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cush-El v. State of Missouri INC.

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 17, 2022

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Monroe v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Strutton v. Hacker

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 10, 2024

    See Bitzan v. … Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Reid v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 3, 2019

    Brown, 528 F.3d 1030, 1032 (8th Cir. 2008), and absent contrary evidence, the Court “assumes that appellate counsel’s failure to raise a claim was an exercise of sound appellate strategy.” … Beavers v. Lockhart, 755 F.2d 657, 661 (8th Cir. 1985) (quoting Evitts v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fogerty v. Kijakazi

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 4, 2023

    See Choate v. Barnhart, 457 F.3d 865, 869–70 (8th Cir. 2006) (restriction to light work with environmental restrictions considered to be significant limitation); see also Brown v. … Hensley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Belcher v. O'Malley

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 20, 2024

    Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 584, 591 (8th Cir. 2004); 20 C.F.R. § 416.920(a)(4)(v). … § 404.970(a)(5); see Browning v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 817, 822 (8th Cir. 1992). Thus, Belcher fails to point to any error in the ALJ’s failure to discuss Dr. Yager’s treatment notes.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stahlhuth v. Berryhill

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 21, 2019

    Polaski v. … Brown v. Astrue, 611 F.3d 941, 955 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting Brace v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 2009)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LaJeuness v. Berryhill

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 11, 2019

    V. … § 405(g); Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971); Pate-Fires v. Astrue, 564 F.3d 935, 942 (8th Cir. 2009); Estes v. Barnhart, 275 F.3d 722, 724 (8th Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cartia v. Beeman

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 8, 2023

    Brown v. City of Golden Valley, 574 F.3d 491, 496 (8th Cir. 2009). The Court considers the claim “from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight.” Id. … See Joseph v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fabrio v. Berryhill

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 1, 2019

    V. … Brown v. Astrue, 611 F.3d 941, 955 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting Brace v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 2009)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tritt v. Kijakazi

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 27, 2024

    The ALJ found that Tritt was unable to perform any past relevant work, but was capable of performing other jobs existing in significant numbers in the national economy, such as circuit board assembler, document preparer … Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 584, 591 (8th Cir. 2004); 20 C.F.R. § 416.920(a)(4)(v).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jessie v. O'Malley

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 26, 2024

    See Nolen v. … Brown v. Astrue, 2012 WL 8868789, *14 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 15, 2012); see also Reece v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.