Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,318 results
0.55s
23 F. Cas. 758 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 1, 1874
In that condition of affairs, the inspector of the board of underwriters at St. Louis informed the master, Snydam, that *759 the boat must be repaired in order to become seaworthy and pass inspection. … Co. v. Baring [20 Wall. (87 U. S.) 159].
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.
50 F. Supp. 2d 925 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 14, 1999
Bullis v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 474 F.2d 392, 394 (9th Cir.1973). In Bullis v. … They were hired to board the barge for a short period of time to conduct a fireworks display. After the fireworks display was complete, they were to return to land and their connection to barge was to be terminated.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 17, 2023
As of the date of this Order, the bankruptcy stay has been extended to non-debtors in Brown v. Corizon, Inc., et al., 2:22-cv-52-DDN (Doc. 27) and Nachtweih v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown942 F. Supp. 1234 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 26, 1996
In Warren v. Manufacturers Nat. … See Davis v. Grusemeyer, 996 F.2d 617, 626-27 (3d Cir.1993); Midwest Grinding Co., Inc. v. Spitz, 976 F.2d 1016, 1024 (7th Cir.1992); Aldridge v. Lily-Tulip, Inc., 953 F.2d 587 , 593-94 (11th Cir.1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 2, 2022
Servs., Inc. v. … Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 804 (8th Cir. 1986). See also McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · May 8, 2024
Taylor v. City of Ballwin, 859 F.2d 1330, 1333 n.7 (8th Cir. 1988) (cleaned up). However, default judgements are not favored in the law, United States ex rel. Time Equip. Rental & Sales, Inc. v. … See Ramshaw v. Ehret, 4:20-CV-359- NAB, 2022 WL 13689212, at *1 (E.D. Mo.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSalvatore v. City of Wildwood, Missouri
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 4, 2020
v. … The Eighth Circuit found that board did not make a satisfactory showing that the regulation was narrowly tailored to serve the board’s interests because it “presented little evidence that forbidding literature distribution
Cited 0 timesUnknownGallagher v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 11, 2022
Ortega v. City of St. Louis, 2021 WL 1105503, at *3 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 23, 2021) (quoting Brown v. Wallace, 957 F.2d 564, 566 (8th Cir. 1992)). … Co. v. Eagle Mist. Corp., 2021 WL 1222424, at *3 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 31, 2021) (slip op.) (quoting Doe v. Cassel, 403 F.3d 986, 991 (8th Cir. 2005) (quoting Bediako v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSan Francisco Ass'n for Blind v. Industrial Aid for Blind, Inc.
58 F. Supp. 995 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 13, 1945
Watch Co.] v. Illinois [Watch Case Co.], 179 U.S. 665 , 21 S.Ct. 270 , 45 L.Ed. 365 ; Brown [Chemical Co.] v. Meyer, 139 U.S. 540 , 11 S.Ct. 625 , 35 L.Ed. 247 ; Photoplay [Pub. Co.] v. La Verne [Pub. … See Sweet Sixteen Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFriesen v. General Motors Corp.
759 F. Supp. 560 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 20, 1991
The HRM Committee members are, essentially, the "executive board" of the plant. … Co. v. Null, 554 F.2d 896, 901 (8th Cir. 1977).
Cited 4 timesPublishedPorter v. Stonecrest of Clayton View
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 1, 2019
Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 9, 2026
United States v. … Applying Section 1225(b)(2), the Board determined that an immigration judge lacked authority to hold a bond hearing for that alien. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLaney v. City of Saint Louis, Missouri
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 28, 2021
Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., 520 U.S. at 404.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 7, 2022
Artis v. … See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8" Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).
Cited 0 timesUnknown424 F. Supp. 259 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 28, 1976
On May 5, 1975, the Board of Aldermen of the City of St. … In Bethune v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 28, 2022
Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8" Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Brown, 2018 WL 4658223, *19 (D.S.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRoberson v. SSM Health Care St. Louis
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 23, 2024
See Smith v. Nordex USA, Inc., 4:22-cv-1421, 2023 WL 1111828, at *2 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 30, 2023); see also Watkins v. … Goldsworthy v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 11, 2022
Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 268 (8th Cir. 1982) (“Bivens and its progeny does not waive sovereign immunity for actions against the United States; it implies a cause of action only against federal officials”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDevlin v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
634 F. Supp. 389 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 13, 1986
United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). … See Lindsey v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBenford v. Handyman Hardware Inc. d/b/a Handyman True Value Hardware
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 29, 2021
Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … See also Stone v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna