Case law

Gregory v. Pritchett

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 1, 2022

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8" Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Fingerhut Corp., 86 F.3d 852, 856 (8" Cir. 1996) (explaining that, in general, a pro se party is not excused “from complying with a court’s orders and with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); and Brown v.

Greene v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 1, 2025

See Greene v. Sprint Nextel Corp., 750 Fed. … Plaintiff states that on July 2, 2022, at the bus stop at Cesar Chavez Avenue and Alameda Street, the Metro Bus driver would not allow him to board the bus because he had a rolling cart.

Keys

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 11, 2025

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … Martin v.

Gwisai v. Peter

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 16, 2025

Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 27 (2008). … v.

Culp v. United Pacific R. Co.

200 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 18, 2001

As such, the proper vehicle for pursuing the claim is the [RLA]. *1102 Bielicke v. Terminal R.R. Ass'n, 30 F.3d 877, 878 (7th Cir.1994). See also Calvert v. … See Lewis v. Louisville & Nashville R.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Union Corp. of America

205 F. Supp. 518 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 3, 1962

And, while a different section is involved in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Atlas Tack Corp., D.C., 93 F. Supp. … In support of its contention it cites numerous cases illustrative of the point that a corporation acts through its board of directors and is controlled thereby.

NRRM, LLC v. American Dream Auto Protect, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 2025

Lerner & Rowe PC v. Brown Engstrand & Shely, LLC, 119 F.4th 711, 718 (9th Cir. 2024). The confusion creates initial consumer interest “even though no actual sale is completed as a result of the confusion.” Jim S. … See Lerner & Rowe PC v. Brown Engstrand & Shely LLC, 119 F.4th 711 (9th Cir. 2024); 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.com, Inc., 722 F.3d 1229 (10th Cir. 2013); Rescuecom Corp v.

Henry v. Vantage Credit Union

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 28, 2021

Green v. SuperShuttle Int'l, Inc., 653 F.3d 766, 769 (8th Cir. 2011); see also Fallo v. … Catamaran Corp. v. Towncrest Pharmacy, 946 F.3d 1020, 1022–23 (8th Cir. 2020) (quoting Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662, 682 (2010)) (emphasis in original); see also Lamps Plus, Inc. v.

RREEF Mid-America Fund III v. Distronics Corp.

652 F. Supp. 1490 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 11, 1987

Kennedy v. Dixon, 439 S.W.2d 173, 180-85 (Mo. en banc 1969); Brown v. Brown, 678 S.W.2d 831, 833 (Mo.App.1984); and State ex rel. Geil v. Corcoran, 623 S.W.2d 555, 556 (Mo.App.1981). … Leawood National Bank v.

Reece v. Lepper

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 14, 2022

For instance, in Brown v. … See also Brown v.

Benge v. Software Galeria, Inc.

608 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 14, 1985

Rabbitt, Brown, James & Rabbitt, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant. MEMORANDUM NANGLE, Chief Judge. This case is now before this Court on several motions filed by defendant. … Newport v.

Hurt v. American College Dictionary

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 13, 2020

See Hurt v. Civil Rights Lawyer, No. 3:17-cv-39-DJH (W.D. Ky. … Board of Parole, et al., No. 1:13-cv-5365-LAP (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2013) (noting that plaintiff has “filed hundreds of lawsuits around the country that [have] been dismissed as frivolous”).

Dutcher v. Foley

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 26, 2025

Brown v. Nix, 33 F.3d 951, 954 (8th Cir. 1994). … See, e.g., Brown, 33 F.3d at 955 (holding that confinement to administrative segregation for nine years did not violate Eighth Amendment); Royal v.

Stone v. J&M Securities, LLC

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 8, 2022

Liddell by Liddell v. Bd. of Educ., 73 F.3d 819, 822 (8th Cir. 1996) (quoting Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58, 74 L. Ed. 2d 225, 103 S. Ct. 400 (1982)). … Life Plus Int'l v. Brown, 317 F.3d 799, 805 (8th Cir. 2003) (citing Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(i)); see also EEOC v.

Union Pacific R. Co. v. MIDLAND EQUITIES INC.

45 F. Supp. 2d 701 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 31, 1999

As stated by the Missouri Court of Appeals in Collet v. … See, e.g., Becherer v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 43 F.3d 1054, 1064 (6th Cir.1995); Cascade Energy and Metals Corporation v. Banks, 896 F.2d 1557, 1577-78 (10th Cir.1990); United States v.

Engel v. CO1

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 19, 2021

) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … See also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (district court may dismiss a self-represented litigant’s action for failure to comply with court order on its own initiative).

Ethex Corp. v. First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corp.

228 F. Supp. 2d 1048 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 1, 2002

In Co-Rect Products, Inc. v. Marvy! … This is the sort of complex issue of state law that should be left to the various pharmacy boards and courts of the respective states. D.

Gaarder v. Webster University

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 22, 2025

Toben v. … United States v.

Hardy v. Pike County Sheriff Dept.

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 28, 2023

Egerdahl v. Hibbing Cmty. Coll., 72 F.3d 615, 619 (8th Cir. 1995). This pleading requirement is strictly enforced by the Eighth Circuit. See Murphy v. Arkansas, 127 F.3d 750, 755 (8th Cir. 1997). … P. 41(b); see also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiff's failure to comply with any court order); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F.

Cargill, Inc. v. Taylor Towing Serv., Inc.

483 F. Supp. 1094 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 27, 1979

Subsequent to the collision, the two dolphins were knocked over completely so that they were no longer visible above the water line and the riverside and shoreside upstream legs and barge boarding platforms of the conveyor … Louis v. Short, 378 S.W.2d 496, 504 (Mo.1964); RED-E-GAS Co. v. Meadows, 360 S.W.2d 236, 240-241 (Spr. Mo.App. 1962).