Case law

Wisdom v. Newberry

30 Mo. App. 241 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1888

Walker v. Deane, 79 Mo. 681 . … Fisher v. Goebel, 40 Mo. 481 , and cases cited.

Sanders v. Slayden

944 S.W.2d 228 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1997

Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). … Nieberg v. Marshall, 865 S.W.2d 409, 410 (Mo.App.1993).

DeSilva v. Director, Division of Aging, Department of Social Services

714 S.W.2d 690 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1986

Preliminarily, we note that it is the Board’s decision, not the judgment of the circuit court, that is the subject of review by this court. Holt v. Personnel Advisory Board, 679 S.W.2d 340, 342 (Mo.App.1984). … King v. Laclede Gas Co., 648 S.W.2d 113, 114 (Mo. banc 1983). See also Ceramo Co., Inc. v.

Pugh v. School District No. 5

114 Mo. App. 688 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1905

The employment must be made by the members as a board, at a regular or special board meeting. [Section 9766, R. S. 1899; Johnson v. School District, 67 Mo. 319 ; Honaker v. Board of Education, 42 W. Va. 170 ; Aikman v. … School Dis., 27 Kans. 129 ; Hazen v. Lerche, 47 Mich. 626 ; Townsend v. School Trustees, 41 N. J. L. 312.] The facts in the case of McShane v. School District, 70 Mo. App. 624 , do not appear as clearly as they might.

Weber v. Firemen's Retirement System

899 S.W.2d 948 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1995

We are bound by the decision of the Board so long as its finding is not contrary to the weight of the evidence, even though the evidence may warrant either of two opposed findings. Webb v. … Therefore, the evidence must be reviewed in a light most favorable to the Board’s findings and its decision reversed only if there is no substantial evidence to support it. Eubank v.

State v. DeWeese

79 S.W.3d 456 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 2002

State v. Bozarth, 51 S.W.3d 179, 181 (Mo.App.2001). The Supreme Court suggested in State v. … Brown, 902 S.W.2d at 284 . “The rule makes it clear that not all prejudicial error — that is, reversible error — can be deemed plain error.” State v. Dowell, 25 S.W.3d 594, 606 (Mo.App.2000).

Beck v. James

793 S.W.2d 416 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1990

Gamble v. Hoffman, 732 S.W.2d 890, 892 (Mo. banc 1987). The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the decision of the Board. Lebedun v. Robinson, 768 S.W.2d 219, 222 (Mo.App.1989). … Franklin v. Board of Directors, School Dist. of Kansas City, 772 S.W.2d 873, 878 (Mo.App.1989).

State v. Schmutz

100 S.W.3d 876 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2003

Even so, the Supreme Court in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979), sheds considerable light on the limits of “reasonableness.” … The Brown court reasoned that the innocent activity coupled with the presence in a high drug area was insufficient. This case has facts similar to those in Brown .

State v. Hawkins

584 S.W.2d 640 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1979

Kansas City v. Verstraete, supra. … State v. Hall, 508 S.W.2d 200 (Mo.App.1974).

State ex rel. Rosenblatt v. New Lindell Hotel Co.

9 Mo. App. 450 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1881

Co. v. Cass County, 53 Mo. 17 , 29 ; The State v. Drake, 33 N. J. L. 194 ; The State v. Anderson, 38 N. J. L. 82 ; Commissioners v. Lang, 8 Kan. 284 , 287 ; Kansas Pacific R. Co. v. Russell, 8 Kan. 558 ; Cleghorn v. … Patten v. Green, 13 Cal. 325 ; Sioux City, etc., R. Co. v. Washington County, 3 Neb. 30, 43 .

HENRY COUNTY and TANEY COUNTY, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. W. ARCHIE DUNN

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2024

Lisle v. Meyer Elec. Co., 667 S.W.3d 100, 103 (Mo. banc 2023). … K.M.J. v. M.A.J., 363 S.W.3d 172, 178 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012).

Roorda v. City of Arnold

142 S.W.3d 786 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2004

In Heinen v. Police Personnel Board of Jefferson City, 976 S.W.2d 534 (Mo.App. … Attorney General v. Shull, 887 S.W.2d 397 (Mo. banc 1994): Yick Wo v.

State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Dalton

831 S.W.2d 942 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 19, 1992

In addition, the Board still must determine whether a parole would be in the best interest of society. Thus, its relationship to the offender is “supervisory in nature, not adversarial.” Smith v. … Respondent cites State ex rel Div. of Adult Institution v.

Dickinson v. Lueckenhoff

598 S.W.2d 560 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1980

Board of Zoning Adjustment, 307 S.W.2d 730 (Mo.App.1957); State ex rel De Weese v. … Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra. See also Dittmeier v.

Martin v. Bennett

139 Mo. App. 237 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1909

[Ranney v. Bader, 67 Mo. 476 ; Black v. Ross, 37 Mo. App. 250 .] The court committed no error in permitting the amended petition to be filed. [Cohn v. Souders, 175 Mo. 455 .] … In Thornburg v.

Fruin-Bambrick Construction Co. v. Geist

37 Mo. App. 509 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1889

Leach v. Cargill, 60 Mo. 316 ; Kiley v. Oppenheimer, 55 Mo. 374 ; City of Kansas, etc., v. Swope,. 79 Mo. 446 . The supreme court in case of Leach v. … In the case of Kiley v.

Lee v. Jamison

338 S.W.3d 844 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2011

On 2 July 2009, the Board passed a resolution purporting to remove Lee as a director. Lee filed for a writ of prohibition, alleging that the means used to remove him were illegal. Robert Lee v. … Griffin v. Belt, 941 S.W.2d 570, 572 (Mo.App. W.D.1997).

Mannering Condominium Association v. David A. Schulte

462 S.W.3d 830 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2015

Vinson v. Adams, 192 S.W.3d 492, 494 (Mo. App. E.D. 2006). Questions of law, including standing, are reviewed de novo. Schweich v. … Hellmann v. Sparks, 2015 WL 1021307 at *5 (Mo. App. S.D.

State Ex Rel. C. C. G. Management Corp. v. City of Overland

624 S.W.2d 50 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1981

Moore v. Board of Education of the Special School District of St. Louis County, 547 S.W.2d 188, 191 (Mo.App.1977). … Moore v. Board of Education of the Special School District of St. Louis County, supra at 191.

State ex rel. Douglas v. Tune

199 Mo. App. 404 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 7, 1918

McCulloch v. Taylor, 187 S. W. 1181 ,” ( 268 Mo. 312 ). … Co. v. Board of Trustees of Michigan Asylum for the Insane, 178 Mich. 193 , 144 N. W. 538 .