Case law

Winsor v. Ottofy

140 Mo. App. 563 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1909

Nor do the cases of Julian v. Kansas City Star Co., 209 Mo. 35 ; McGinnis v. Geo. Knapp & Co., 109 Mo. 131 ; Sullivan v. Com. Co., 152 Mo. 268 ; Meriwether v. Knapp & Co., 120 Mo. App. 354 , s. c. 211 Mo. 199 ; Brown v. … In Meriwether v. Knapp & Co., 211 Mo. 199 , the case was reversed on account of an erroneous instruction. In Brown v. Knapp & Co., and Brown v.

Vorbeck v. McNeal

560 S.W.2d 245 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1977

Moore v. Damos, supra. *251 Furthermore, the statement by the Board does not attach a “badge of infamy” on the plaintiff nor subject him to any grievous loss requiring notice and a hearing under Wisconsin v. … Rule 7.010 Police Board Manual. This rule was upheld as a valid exercise of the Board’s power in Milani v. Miller, 515 S.W.2d 412 (Mo.1974).

Moynihan v. City of Manchester

265 S.W.3d 350 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2008

Prichard, v. Ward, 305 S.W.2d 900, 901-02 (Mo.App.1957). … The individual acts of a board’s members, or the unofficial act of all its members, are of no force. See State ex rel Dussault v. Board of Adjustment, City of Maryland Heights, 901 S.W.2d 318, 320 (Mo.App.

Reynolds v. Beck

108 Mo. App. 188 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1904

Howard sometimes collected the full fee and credited it on account for board. … Shepard, 6 Vt. 523 ; Morris v. Hyde, 8 Vt. 356 ; Dewey v. Thrall, 13 Vt. 284 ; O’Gara v. Lowry, 5 Mont. 435 ; Ewing v. Merkly, 3 Utah 412 ; Brown v. Riley, 22 Ill. 46 ; Wright v. Grove, 27 Ill. 426 ; Brady v.

Town of Canton v. McDaniel

91 Mo. App. 626 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1902

State v. Raymond, 156 Mo. 117 ; Kirkwood v. Meramec Highlands Co., 160 Mo. 111 . … State ex rel. v. Court of Appeals, 97 Mo. 276 . In this view of tbe case, tbe Supreme Court is tbe proper tribunal to adjudicate tbe Federal question so raised on tbe record.

Paty v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

168 S.W.3d 625 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 2005

Walker v. Dir. of Revenue, 137 S.W.3d 444, 446 (Mo. banc 2004). The trial court must assess the facts by viewing the situation as it would have appeared to a prudent, cautious and trained police officer. Brown v. … The trial court found that the officer did not have probable cause when he arrested Brown, and reinstated Brown’s license. Id.

State v. Fanning

647 S.W.2d 177 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1983

State v. Brown, 611 S.W.2d 301, 302 (Mo.App.1980). By failing to request a mistrial appellant has not preserved his point for review. State v. Ginnery, 617 S.W.2d 117, 120 (Mo.App.1981). … State v. Meiers, 412 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Mo.1967); State v. Brown, supra, 611 S.W.2d at 302 ; State v.

Hallmark v. Stillings

620 S.W.2d 436 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1981

Hayes v. Cardwell, 575 S.W.2d 816, 822 (Mo.App.1978); J. G. Jackson Associates, Inc. v. Mosley, 308 S.W.2d 774, 776 [1, 2] (Mo.App.1958). … Riddle v. Dean Machinery Co., 564 S.W.2d 238, 259 (Mo.App.1978); M.F.A. Cooperative Ass’n of Mansfield v. Murray, 365 S.W.2d 279, 289-290 [16-18] (Mo.App.1963).

Browne v. Franklin Fire Insurance

225 Mo. App. 665 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1931

'Browne, is a practicing attorney of said city. … Browne, attorney at law, agreeing to .give Browne one-third of any amount collected on the Franklin policy for his services in collecting it.

Leslie v. Leslie

620 S.W.2d 48 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1981

In Teefey v. Teefey, 533 S.W.2d 563, 566 [3] (Mo. banc 1976) the court stated: “Criminal contempts are sometimes referred to as direct while civil contempts are described as constructive or indirect.” … Stanhope v. Pratt, 533 S.W.2d 567, 569-571 (Mo. banc 1976). . Nor did the judgment mention the affirmative defense raised by Leslie that due to illness he had not been able to make the payments.

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

555 S.W.2d 38 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1977

In Hale v. Central Mfrs. Mut. Ins. … In Hale v. Central Mfrs. Mut.

State v. Duff

281 S.W.3d 320 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 2009

Elliott left Duffs house and reported back to Brown. Brown retrieved the money, tape recorder, and marijuana from Elliott. … He relies on State v.

Berlin v. Pickett

100 S.W.3d 163 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2003

Mathewson v. Board of Election Comm’rs of St. Louis County, 841 S.W.2d 633, 634 (Mo. banc 1992). Unless aggrieved by a judgment, a party has no standing to appeal. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. v. … Morris v. Brown, 941 S.W.2d 835, 839 (Mo.App.1997). The standard of review is that of a court-tried case. Kamil, Decker & Co., P.C. v. SMC Props., Inc. 998 S.W.2d 818, 819 (Mo.App.1999); City of Hamilton v.

Mullen v. City of Kansas City

557 S.W.2d 652 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1977

It is true that the Board’s duty is to find and determine the facts. Veal v. Leimkuehler, 249 S.W.2d 491, 496 [9—12] (Mo.App.1952); McKinney v. … Under such circumstances the scope of this court’s review is whether or not, in the proceeding before the Board, there was competent and substantial evidence to support the Board’s order. Beckmeyer v.

Epps v. Ragsdale

429 S.W.2d 798 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1968

Land, Mo., 420 S.W.2d 505 [4]; Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo. … Compare Brown v. Bryan, Mo., 419 S.W.2d 62, 67 .

State v. Merritt

540 S.W.2d 183 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1976

State v. Browning, 442 S.W.2d 55 (Mo. banc 1969); State v. Simon, 534 S.W.2d 839 (Mo.App. 1976); State v. Cook, supra. … State v. Brown, 502 S.W.2d 295 (Mo.1973); State v. Walker, 525 S.W.2d 826 (Mo.App. 1975).

Rowland v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

124 Mo. App. 605 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1907

Brown’s testimony is inconclusive at this point. … [Grumley v. Webb, 44 Mo. 444 ; Bigbee v. Coombs, 64 Mo. 529 .]

Cozad v. Elam

115 Mo. App. 136 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1905

[Devore v. Devore, 138 Mo. 181 , 39 S. W. 68 ; Brown on Stat. of Frauds (5 Ed.), 1895, sec. 118.] … [Abbott v. Draper, 4 Den. (N. Y.) 51; Smith v. Smith, 28 N. J. L. 208; Coughlin v. Knowles, 7 Met. (Mass.) 57; Collier v. Coates, 17 Barb. (N. Y.) 417; Galway v. Shields, 66 Mo. 313 ; Browning v.

Kansas City Star Co. v. Fulson

859 S.W.2d 934 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1993

Brawley v. McNary, 811 S.W.2d 362, 365 (Mo. banc 1991). … State Bd. v. Southworth, 704 S.W.2d 219, 224 (Mo. banc 1986).

Edwards v. Gerstein

363 S.W.3d 155 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2012

Moheet v. State Bd. of Registration for the Healing Arts, 154 S.W.3d 393, 404 (Mo.App.2004). Similarly, in Gregg v. … Hagedorn v. Adams, 854 S.W.2d 470, 477 (Mo.App.1993). The Board members are estopped from contesting that stipulation. Points III and IV denied.