Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

4.37s

  • Huber v. Magna Bank of Missouri

    959 S.W.2d 812 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1997

    Martin v. City of Washington, 848 S.W.2d 487, 491 (Mo. banc 1993). … Boatright v. Shaw, 804 S.W.2d 795, 796 (Mo.App. E.D.1990).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Missouri Electric Cooperatives v. Kander

    497 S.W.3d 905 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2016

    The rationale for limiting pre-election review of the constitutionality of an initiative petition is explained in Brown v. … Co. v. Kirkpatrick, 678 S.W.2d 402, 405 (Mo.banc 1984) (citing State ex rel. Dahl v. Lange, 661 S.W.2d 7, 8 (Mo.banc 1983); Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 165 S.W.2d 657 (Mo.banc 1942); Pitman v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dave McNeill v. City of Kansas City, MO

    459 S.W.3d 509 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2015

    Johnson v. Merchants' & Miners' Bank, 213 S.W. 815, 818 (Mo. banc 1919), the Supreme Court observed that, where "'a board of special and limited powers . . . steps outside of its jurisdiction[,] its acts are void.'" … In Brown v. Color Coating, Inc., 867 S.W.2d 242, 244 (Mo.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bethesda Barclay House v. Ciarleglio

    88 S.W.3d 85 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2002

    Homes v. … In Salvation Army v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Metmor Financial, Inc. v. Leggett

    787 S.W.2d 733 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1989

    Kerr v. Kerr, 519 S.W.2d 303 (Mo.App., K.C.Dist.1975). A judgment entered without personal jurisdiction over a party is void. Gerding v. … Burchett, 572 S.W.2d at 502 (citing Murphy v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Glendinning Companies of Connecticut v. Letz

    591 S.W.2d 92 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1979

    Magenheim v. Board of Education, 347 S.W.2d 409, 417 (Mo.App.1961). … Brown-Forman Distillers Corporation v. Stewart, 520 S.W.2d 1, 11 (Mo. banc 1975). In Milgram Food Stores, Inc. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Birk v. City of Jackson

    907 S.W.2d 181 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1995

    Mitchell v. City of Sikeston, 555 S.W.2d 281, 288 (Mo. banc 1977). Plaintiffs rely on State ex rel. County of St. Charles v. … Rothermich v. Gallagher, 816 S.W.2d 194, 200 (Mo. banc 1991).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Beauchamp v. Higgins

    20 Mo. App. 514 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1886

    We are referred, in support of the affirmative of this proposition, to the following cases: Bell v. Kaiser, 50 Mo. 150 ; Tyler v. Paul, 52 Mo. 249 ; Lincoln v. McClatchie, 36 Conn. 136 . … The defendant testified that Brown, to whom the-sale was made, came to Breckenridge, and plaintiff tried to effect a sale to him, but without success. “He (plaintiff ) was not working for me.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Sweetgum Properties, LLC v. St. Louis County Board of Equalization, Cheryl A. Kunzler, James F. Horne, and Robert S. Koch

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 2024

    Rosenberg v. Jarrett, 233 S.W.3d 757, 761 (Mo. App. W.D. 2007) (internal citation omitted). In Professional Fire Fighters of Eastern Missouri v. … Dept. of Veterans Affairs v. Boresi, 396 S.W.3d 356, 359 (Mo. bane 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sartori v. Kohner Properties, Inc.

    277 S.W.3d 879 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2009

    Subsequently, Jan Briley (hereinafter, “Briley”) and Carol Brown (hereinafter, “Brown”), property managers with Employer, called Claimant into a meeting on August 16, 2007. … Fitzpatrick v. Don Brown Automotive Group, Inc., 237 S.W.3d 595, 596 (Mo.App. E.D.2007).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Jansen v. Statler

    236 Mo. App. 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1940

    At such special election duly held in the three townships named, the proposition submitted was overwhelmingly defeated, as shown by the certificate of the board of canvassers appointed to count the vote, following which the … Browning v. Juden (Mo. App.), 264 S. W. 101 ; State ex rel. Sturgeon v. Bishop, 195 Mo. App. 30 , 189 S. W. 593 ; Weaver v. Bryan, 235 Mo. App. 385 , 35 S. W. (2d) 639 ; Wells v. Null, 208 Mo. App. 650 , 235 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Mason v. County Legislature

    75 S.W.3d 884 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 28, 2002

    Two boards of election commissioners are located in Jackson County. These are the Jackson County Board of Election Commissioners and the Kansas City Board of Election Commissioners. … Chiavola v. Vill. of Oakwood, 931 S.W.2d 819, 825 (Mo.App. W.D.1996); See also St. Louis Police Officers’ Ass’n v. Sayad, 685 S.W.2d 913 , 916-17 (Mo.App. E.D.1984).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bowers v. S-H-S Motor Sales Corp.

    481 S.W.2d 584 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1972

    In Ford v. … The recent case of Baker v. St.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Washington

    901 S.W.2d 276 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1995

    State v. Newlon, 627 S.W.2d 606 (Mo. banc 1982) [8, 9]. However, in State v. … Brown v. State, 882 S.W.2d 154 (Mo.App.1994). *281 Judgment on Count II is reversed and that Count is remanded for new trial.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Piccinino v. City of St. Louis

    921 S.W.2d 150 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 7, 1996

    The Board of Building Appeals of the City of St. … The trial court did not err in finding the board’s decision was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Embry v. Hargadine

    127 Mo. App. 383 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1907

    Even more pointed was the language of Baron Bramwell in Brown v. Hare, 3 Hurlst. & N. *484, *495: “Intention is immaterial till it manifests itself in an act. … [Belt v. Goode, 31 Mo. 128 ; Davies v. Baldwin, 66 Mo. App. 577 .] In Lancaster v. Elliott, 28 Mo.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Stone v. Fry

    191 Mo. App. 607 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1915

    Brown and Mary F. .Brown, his wife, the grantee one Sam Rosenberg. … [Asbury v. Hicklin, 181 Mo. 658 , l. c. 670, 81 S. W. 390 ; Seafield v. Bohne, 169 Mo. 537 , l. c. 546, 69 S. W. 1051 ; German-American Bank v. Manning, 133 Mo. App. 294 , l. c. 298, 113 S. W. 251 ; Smoot v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Browne's Appeal

    69 Mo. App. 159 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1897

    State v. Hynes, 39 Mo. App. 569 . … State v. Ransberger, 42 Mo. App. 466 . The requirement of section 4057, Revised Statutes, does not apply to proceedings before a justice of the peace. State v. Flowers, 56 Mo.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ice v. Harris

    309 S.W.3d 412 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2010

    Vette v. Dir. of Revenue, 99 S.W.3d 563, 567 (Mo.App.2003). … Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc., 211 S.W.3d 145, 148 (Mo.App.2007).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Laclede Gas Co. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Com.

    657 S.W.2d 644 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1983

    See Travis v. Grabiec, supra; Aaron v. Review Board, supra. … The reasoning in Aaron v. Review Board, supra and Travis v. Grabiec, supra is preferred.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.