Case law

Warren v. Ray County Coal Co.

200 Mo. App. 442 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1919

Defendant places reliance chiefly on Hudson v. Browning, 264 Mo. 58 , and Reigart v. Coal & Coke Co., 217 Mo. 142 . The cases are unlike the one before us in essential particulars. … [Towne v. Bowers, 81 Mo. 491, 496 ; McAlister v. Graham, 200 Mo. App. 279 ; Sedalia B. Co. v. Sedalia Water Works, 34 Mo. App. 49, 54 .] In the latter case we said: “We determined in Harris v. Township Board, 22 Mo.

McBee v. Schlupbach

529 S.W.2d 435 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1975

Consequently, we have held in cases such as Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo., 421 S.W.2d 255 , and Murphy v. … See Brown v. Public Service Company, Houston v. Northup, Senter v. Ferguson, supra.

Conley v. City of St. Louis

561 S.W.3d 848 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2018

Missouri Veterans Home v. Brown , 374 S.W.3d 359 , 364 (Mo. App. W.D. 2012). … Sonderman testified that when he opened the bag he saw a shot glass and a boarding pass.

Mary Broyles v. Department of Community Health & Environment of St. Charles County

456 S.W.3d 517 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2015

Charles County Division of Human Services (Division Director) declared a brown and black male German Shepherd named Diesel, to be a dangerous dog, pursuant to St. Charles County Ordinance, Section 205.142. … “We ‘must look to the whole record in reviewing the Board’s decision, not merely at that evidence that supports its decision, ‘and we no longer view the evidence in the light most favorable to the agency’s decision.’”

Kelly v. Stewart

93 Mo. App. 47 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1902

Gutridge v. The Mo. Pac. Ry. Oo., 105 Mo. 520 ; Brown v. L. & L. Co., 65 Mo. App. 162 ; Higgins v. The Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 43 Mo. App. 547 . … Miller v. The Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 109 Mo. l. c. 356; Poster v. The Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 115 Mo. l. c. 180; Berry et al. v. The Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 124 Mo. l. c. 249; Card v. Eddy, 129 Mo. l. c. 516; Steube v.

Dent Phelps R-III School District v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

870 S.W.2d 915 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1994

See Board for Architects v. Earth Resources, 820 S.W.2d 505, 507 [2] (Mo.App.1991). … See Brown v. Mercantile Bank of Poplar Bluff, 820 S.W.2d 327 , 331 n. 1 (Mo.App.1991).

Bannum, Inc. v. City of St. Louis

195 S.W.3d 541 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 2006

Bannum appealed to the Board of Adjustment but withdrew the appeal. Bannum pursued a substantive due process claim under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 in U.S. federal district court. … Rule 67.01; O’Reilly v. City of Hazelwood, 850 S.W.2d 96, 98 (Mo. banc 1993); Heitman v. Brown Group, 638 S.W.2d 316 (Mo.App. E.D.1982).

Snowbarger v. M. F. A. Central Co-operative

328 S.W.2d 50 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1959

Clarence Brown, an employee of M. F. A. … Claimant cites John v.

Kammerman v. Wiggington

70 Mo. App. 476 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1897

The first was for work and labor, payment of wages to work hands, and for board furnished. … App. loc. cit. 641; Carter v. Phillips, 49 Mo. App. loc. cit. 323; Painter v. Ritchey, 43 Mo. App. loc. cit. *481 112; and in Brown v. Chadwick, 79 Mo. loc. cit. 589.

Stegall v. Peoples Bank of Cuba

270 S.W.3d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2008

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 207 S.W.3d 76, 114 (Mo.App. W.D.2006) (citing Maddox v. Truman Med. Ctr., Inc., 727 S.W.2d 152,155 (Mo.App. … Section 1693r states: The Board shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of [the EFTA] any class of electronic fund transfers within any State if the Board determines that under the law of that State that class of

State v. Mueller

388 S.W.2d 53 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1965

Brown v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, Mo.App., 375 S.W.2d 623, 628 ; Swink v. Swink, Mo., 367 S.W.2d 575, 578 ; Landers v. Smith, Mo.App., 379 S.W.2d 884, 886 . … Brown v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, supra (375 S.W.2d l. c. 629.)

Jefferson City Medical Group, P.C. v. David Brummett

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2024

Brown v. Rollet Bros. Trucking Co., 291 S.W.3d 766, 774 (Mo. App. 2009) (citation omitted). … See Brown v. Pfeiffer, 682 S.W.3d 45, 55 n.5 (Mo.

State of Missouri ex rel. Missouri Department of Corrections v. The Honorable Daniel R. Green, Curcuit Judge

Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 2024

Kilbane v. … Brown v. Brown, 680 S.W.3d 507, 521 (Mo. App. W.D. 2023).

Delise diaz v. Autozoners, LLC, D/B/A Autozone

484 S.W.3d 64 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2015

But Brown did not call Diaz back. 10 Diaz waited a couple of weeks before calling Brown again. … This time she spoke with Brown and advised Brown of the harassment, but Brown cut the conversation short because she had a meeting; she told Diaz she would either call back or “pop in the store” soon to see her.

Pitts v. Board of Education of Reorganized School District R-IX of Grundy County

568 S.W.2d 595 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1978

Wolf v. Missouri State Training School for Boys, 517 S.W.2d 138, 142 [3, 4] (Mo. banc 1975). The decision of the Board to deny student Pitts evaluation as a handicapped child rests on an error of law. … Tootle v. Tootle, 362 S.W.2d 760, 762 [3, 4] (Mo.App.1962). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot. All concur. .

Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. Vilkins

712 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1986

Joseph, Inc. v. … See also the there footnoted cases of Duff v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Corp., 363 Mo. 944 , 255 S.W.2d 792, 793-794 [1] (Mo. banc 1953); State v. Brown, 446 S.W.2d 498, 500 [4] (Mo.App.1969); and Campbell v.

Meyer v. Bobb

185 Mo. App. 685 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1914

App. 427 ; Jaicks v. Merrill, 201 Mo. 91 , 98 S. W. 753 ; Steffen v. Fox, 56 Mo. App. 9 . … A case very much in point to the one at bar is that of Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Me. 450 .

Caldwell v. J. A. Kreis & Sons

227 Mo. App. 127 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1932

[Higgins v. Boiler Co., 328 Mo. 493 , 41 S. W. (2d) 565 ; Wheeler v. Ry. Co., 328, Mo. 888, 42 S. W. (2d) 579 .] … [Turner v. Noble, 211 Mo. App. 656 , 249 S. W. 103 , and cases therein cited; Eulinberg v. Life Ins. Co. (Mo. App.), 261 S. W. 725 .]

Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co.

170 Mo. App. 503 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1913

[Grunby v. Brown, 86 Mo. 1 . c. 258.] But the court struck out the defense setting up the fact that there was an unreasonable delay. … if they did not make a selection, the board of public works should do so.

Meramec Valley R-III School District v. City of Eureka

281 S.W.3d 827 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2009

Discussion Point I — Blight In determining whether an area is blighted, and in approving a Redevelopment Plan, the Board acts in its legislative capacity. JG St. Lotus West Ltd. Liability Co. v. … Point III — Fairly Debatable Test v. Summary Judgment Standard In determining whether an area is blighted and in approving the Redevelopment Plan, the Board acts in its legislative capacity. JG St.