Case law

State v. Anderson

620 S.W.2d 378 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1981

State v. … Accord, State v. Alexander, 620 S.W.2d 380 (Mo. banc 1981).

State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Sartorius

340 Mo. 832 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 24, 1937

Ry. v. Fowler, 113 Mo. 458 , 20 S. W. 1069 ; Rothan v. St. Louis, Oak Hill & C. Ry. Co., 113 Mo. 132 , 20 S. W. 892 . … Louis v. Gerhart Realty Co., 328 Mo. 103 , 40 S.

Johansen v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.

345 Mo. 135 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 14, 1939

The cruise showed a total of 672,911,800 board feet, which included 229,841,900 board feet of palmetto. Eliminating the palmetto, there were 433,069,900 board feet. … [Rogers v. Stag Mining Co., 185 Mo. App. 659 , 171 S.W. 676 ; 13 Am. Jur., sec. 512.]

State v. Short

250 Mo. 331 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 20, 1913

BROWN, P. J. … In the recent case of State v.

State v. McMahill

214 Mo. 310 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1908

The shot struck the bump board, which concealed and protected his body, a few of the shot going through a crack in the board, penetrating his clothing and *313 blistering his back. … State v. Morney, 196 Mo. 43 , cited by the defendant, was not nearly so strong a ease for the State as the case in hand.

State v. Meyer

246 Mo. 596 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1912

BROWN, P. J Defendant was charged by information with the crime of disturbing the peace of an individual. Prom a judgment of the circuit court of Montgomery pounty quashing the information, the State appeals. … [State v. Ramsey, 110 Mo. 212 ; State v. Zinn, 141 Mo. 329 ; State v. McKee, 196 Mo. 106 ; State v. Cook, 217 Mo. 326 .]

Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. Miller

106 Mo. 458 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

It simply requires the damages to be assessed either by a jury or by a board of not less than three freeholders. … These views are in accord with the prior rulings of this court in Railroad v. Story, 96 Mo. 611 , and in Railroad v. Town-Site Co., 103 Mo. 451 .

Bond v. Weiner

346 Mo. 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1940

[Morton v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 323 Mo. 929 , 20 S.W.2d 34 , l.c. 41; Gray v. Columbia Terminals Co. et al., 331 Mo. 73 , 52 S.W.2d 809 ; Kramer v. Grand Nat. Bank, 336 Mo. 1022 , 81 S.W.2d 961 , l.c. 967.] … The cases cited and to which reference is made are Brennan v. City of St. Louis, 92 Mo. 482 , 2 S.W. 481 ; Bailey v. Kansas City, 189 Mo. 503 , 87 S.W. 1182 ; Wagner v. Gilsonite Construction Co.

Lewis v. Brubaker

322 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1929

In Mott v. … This distinguishes the case at bar in this respect, from Dudley v. Clark, supra. Finally, the record enumerates some thirty or more business activities by the Board of Trustees.

Arnold v. Hawkins

95 Mo. 569 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1888

Overall v. Ruenzi, 67 Mo. 203 ; Ewing v. Board, 72 Mo. 436 . … Joseph Board of Public Schools v. Patton, 62 Mo. 449 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 74 Mo. 163 ; State ex rel. v. VanEvery, 75 Mo. 530 .

Rothan v. St. Louis, Oak Hill & Carondelet Railway Co.

113 Mo. 132 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1892

In Chambers v. … Railroad v. Story, 96 Mo. 611 ; Railroad v. Cudmore, 103 Mo. 635 ; Bailroad v. Town-Site Co., 103 Mo. 451 ; Railroad v. Miller, 106 Mo. 458 ; Railroad v. Shambaugh, 106 Mo. 557 .

State Ex Rel. Henry v. State Auditor

342 Mo. 797 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1938

The bonds were ruled valid in Thomson & Co. v. Conran-Gideon Special Road District, 323 Mo. 953 , 19 S. W. (2d) 1049 . … Furthermore, in State ex rel. v. Hannibal & St. Jos. Ry. Co., 113 Mo. 297 , 21 S. W. 14 , the county court levied a tax in November for the payment of the bonds.

Morrison v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

96 Mo. 602 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

State v. Chambers, 70 Mo. 626 . 2. … State ex rel. v. Union Trust Co., 68 Mo. 463 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 92 Mo. 137 .

Humphreys v. Lundy

37 Mo. 320 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1866

Pl. 127, 299; McGill v. Perigo, 9 J. R. 259.) It is not the commencement of an action to which the statute of limitations can be pleaded. (Brown v. Byrd, 5 Eng., Ark., 533; Evans v. White, 7 Eng., Ark., 33.) … (Randolph v. Randolph, 3 Rand. 490 ; Gee v. Hamilton, 6 Mumf. 32.)

State Ex Rel. Hayden v. Thomas

353 Mo. 332 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1944

Then Ferguson filed with the Board his protest against the inclusion of the name of each relator as the candidate of his respective party, and the Board by resolution sustained the protest. … Asotsky v. Hicks, 346 Mo. 640 , 142 S. W. (2d) 472 .] This vacancy occurred after the primary and could not then have been voted on. In State ex inf. Barrett v. McClure, 299 Mo. 688 , 253 S.

McClanahan v. West

100 Mo. 309 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Slack v. Lyon, 9 Pick. 62 ; Brown v. Bowen, 90 Mo. 184 ; Bigelow on Estoppel [3 Ed.] 562, 601, 602, and cases cited. … Cruchon v. Brown, 57 Mo. 38 ; Weil v. Simmons, 66 Mo. 617 ; Mueller v. Kaessmann, 84 Mo. 330 ; Wescott v. Bridwell, 40 Mo. 146 ; Shaw v. Davis, 55 Barb. 389 ; Cent. Law Journ. 1886, 553; Hunt v.

Hood v. Mathis

21 Mo. 308 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1855

Huxly v. Berg, 1 Stark. 98. Wright v. Paulin, 1 Ry. & Mo. Rep. 128. Wynne v. Anderson, 3 Car. & Payne, 596.) But in Child v. … v.

State ex rel. Smith v. Paul's

21 Mo. 51 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1855

In the case of Jewett v. Weaver's Adm'r, 10 Mo. Rep. 234 , this court held that an action on a bond, with collateral condition, might be maintained in the county court. … In the case of Farrar & Brown v. United States, (5 Pet.) the sureties of the surveyor general executed a bond, in the penalty of $30,000, conditioned for the faithful discharge of the duties of that officer.

State v. Present

344 S.W.2d 9 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1961

State v. Brown, Mo., 332 S.W.2d 904, 910 ; State v. Sapp, 356 Mo. 705 , 203 S.W.2d 425, 430 . … In State v. Brown, Mo., 332 S.W.2d 904 , the court said, loc. cit. 910: “Much depends upon the particular type of the abstract instruction and upon the particular facts of the case. See State v.

State v. Taylor

324 S.W.2d 643 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1959

Johnny Day testified that he saw the defendant with a brown-handled revolver sticking from his belt similar to the gun in evidence at a party on this Saturday night. … State v.