Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.45s
City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.
263 Mo. 507 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 25, 1915
Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant,” decided at this' term. … J., and Woodson and Brown, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in an opinion filed in 17254, in which Bond and Faris, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublished19 Mo. 227 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1853
State v. Whitney, 8 Mo. Rep. 165 . 2. As to the admission of the letter in evidence, there is no error, in our opinion, on this point. … White, the mail agent, on board the boat, saying he had written it to a friend of his in Alton, to arrest the thief ; that he had stolen a coat and perhaps something else from him (Barton.)
Cited 9 timesPublishedMoore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.
113 Mo. 98 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1892
We think the assignment was within the apparent authority conferred on him and was sufficient without the formal action of a board of directors. Sparks v. Dispatch Trans. Co., 104 Mo. 531 ; Bank v. … Dermott v. Jones, 2 Wall. 9 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. Knapp, 9 Peters, 565 ; Mansur v. Botts, 80 Mo. 651 ; Yeats v. Ballentine, 56 Mo. 536 .
Cited 49 timesPublished135 Mo. 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 7, 1896
Louis, and which are under condemnation by the board of health of the city of St. … S. v. Hartwell, 6 Wall. 396 . The same rule of construction applies in ease of a prosecution for the violation of a city ordinance for whose violation a fine or imprisonment is imposed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFirst National Bank of Kansas City v. Jacques
470 S.W.2d 557 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971
In Logan v. … In Johnson v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedFry v. National Rejectors, Inc.
306 S.W.2d 465 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1957
Liese v. Sackbauer, Mo., 222 S.W.2d 84 . … Fry’s employment contract. 5 Fletcher, Cyclopedia Corporations, Sec. 2143, p. 587; Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co., supra; Clamitz v. Thatcher Mfg. Co., supra; Mann v. Luke, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Mount Pleasant Township v. Hall
304 Mo. 83 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 5, 1924
extend the special road levy made by the township board against property in the special road districts. … [Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651 ; Lord v. Veazie, 8 How. 251 ; Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 85 U.S. 129 ; Security Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Prewitt, 200 U.S. 446 ; Gormley v. Day, 114 Ill. 185 ; Aff v. Hopkins, 57 Ill. App. 529 .]
Cited 1 timesPublishedSta-Whip Sales Co. v. City of St. Louis
307 S.W.2d 495 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1957
See, also, King v. … Borden’s Farm Products Co., Inc. *499 v. Baldwin, 293 U.S. 194 , 55 S.Ct. 187 , 79 L.Ed. 281 ; Defiance Milk Co. v. DuMond, 282 App.Div. 977 , 125 N.Y.S.2d 533 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedState ex rel. McCaffery v. Aloe
47 L.R.A. 393 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 5, 1899
[State ex rel. v. Railroad, 48 Mo. 468 ; State ex rel. v. Laughlin, 75 Mo. 147 ; Phillips v. Railroad, 86 Mo. 540 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 92 Mo. 137 ; State ex rel. v. Pond, 93 Mo. 606 ; St. … [Fletcher v.
Cited 59 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Public Service Commission v. Shain
342 Mo. 867 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 8, 1938
Louis v. Public Service Commission, 329 Mo. 918 , 47 S. W. (2d) 102 ; State ex rel. and to use of Henson v. Brown, 326 Mo. 230 , 31 S. W. (2d) 208 ; State ex rel. City of Harrisonville v. … [State ex rel. and to use of Henson v. Brown, supra; State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Public Service Commission, 233 S. W. 425 .] Respondents ruled that appellants sustained that burden.
Cited 7 timesPublished356 Mo. 228 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1947
Brown v. Jarvis Engineering Co., 166 Mass. 75 , 43 N.E. 1118 ; Marion v. Chicago R.I. and P.R. Co., 59 Iowa 428 , 13 N.W. 415 , 8 Am. Eng. R.R. Cases 177; Farber v. Missouri Pac. Ry. … Brown v. Jarvis Engineering Co., supra.
Cited 36 timesPublishedState ex rel. Carrington v. Human
544 S.W.2d 538 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 21, 1976
Danforth v. Hickey, 475 S.W.2d 617, 618-19 (Mo. banc 1972); State ex inf. Danforth v. Banks, 454 *540 S.W.2d 498, 500 (Mo. banc 1970). Consistent with both the language and history of Art. … The respondent boards of election commissioners of St. Louis City and St.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTravis Poke v. Independence School District
Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 2022
(2) The state, county, municipal corporation, township, school or road, drainage, swamp and levee districts, or school boards, board of education, regents, curators, managers or control commission, board … App. 2021) (involving the board of a state university).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSteamboat Prairie Rose v. Cross
34 Mo. 109 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1863
(Hood v. Mathis, 21 Mo. 308 ; Campbell & Maison v. Hood, 6 Mo. 211 .) … The declarations of defendant Brown, that he was not a partner, were inadmissible in his favor. It does not appear *113 that the plaintiff had given evidence of declarations made by Brown. 4.
Cited 0 timesPublished278 Mo. 372 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 3, 1919
[State v. Walker, 78 Mo. l. c. 388; 1 G-reenleaf, sec. 197-8; State v. Butler, 258 Mo. 1 . c. 436.] … [State v. Conway, 241 Mo. l. c. 279-89; State v. Wellman, 253 Mo. l. c. 315.]
Cited 3 timesPublishedSt. Francois County v. State Tax Commission
352 S.W.2d 656 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1961
Co. v. … Joseph Lead Company appeared before the Board of Equalization and in the same month before the Board of Appeals.
Cited 6 timesPublished146 Mo. 523 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1898
“V. “Mortuary Fund. “Sec. 1. … In Dobyns v. Bay State Ben. Ins.
Cited 25 timesPublishedKyle G. Petersen v. State of Missouri
Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 22, 2022
State v. … State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 284 (Mo. banc 1995). A defendant “bears the burden of demonstrating a manifest injustice occurred.” Loper, 609 S.W.3d at 733.
Cited 0 timesPublished119 Mo. 653 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 5, 1894
The facts in this case are substantially like the facts in the case of Ellerbe v. Barney, with one exception. … The judgment in this case should he affirmed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the case of the same plaintiff v. Barney.
Cited 15 timesPublishedAmerican Manufacturing Co. v. City of St. Louis
270 Mo. 40 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1917
BROWN, C. — This case, like the one numbered 18185 decided at this term, is to recover license taxes paid the city of St. … [Jarman v. Unionville School District, 264 Mo. 646 ; State ex rel. v. Alt, 224 Mo. 493 .] Our statute (R.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna