Opinion

City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.

  • 263 Mo. 507
  • 174 S.W. 109
  • 1915 Mo. LEXIS 163
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
Jan 25, 1915
Status
Published
Author
Walker
On the bench
Bond, Brown, Faris, Graves, Lamm, Walker, Woodson
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 51.6%

The opinion

WALKER, J.

The five eases above numerically designated and identical as to the respective parties thereto, involve the same issues and are determined by the same principles of law declared by this court in case numbered 17254 and entitled “City of St. Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant,” decided at this' term. The judgments, therefore, in said cases numbered 17524, 17526, 17527, 17528 and 17570 are affirmed for the reasons stated in said case numbered 17254. And it is so ordered.

Lamm, G. J., and Woodson and Brown, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in an opinion filed in 17254, in which Bond and Faris, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.