Case law

Pflueger v. Kinsey

320 Mo. 82 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 18, 1928

City of Rosebury (Ore.), 160 Pac. 543 ; Longworth v. City of Cincinnati, 34 Ohio St. 101 ; In re Fifth Avenue Sewer, 4 Brewster (Pa.) 364, 369; and Board of Commissioners v. Fullen, 118 Ind. 158 . The case of Giles v. … Longworth v.

Fogarty v. Davis

305 Mo. 288 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 27, 1924

In Board of Education ex rel. v. Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 155 Mo. … [MacKenzie v. Board of School Trustees of Edinburg, 72 Ind. 1 . c. 196; Mayes v. Lane, 116 Ky. 1 . c. 572, 573.] The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, for this circuit, in an opinion by Sanbokn, J., in which Mr.

Ensworth v. Albin

46 Mo. 450 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1870

(See Sharpless et al. v. The Mayor of Philadelphia, 21 Penn. 147 ; Morrison v. Springer, 15 Iowa, 304 .) 3. … The case presents no issue as to the action of the board in receiving *455 or rejecting applicants for registration.

City of St. Louis v. Boffinger

19 Mo. 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1853

Louis v. McCoy, it may be well again to state the principles upon which the decision rests. … Any steamboat coming from New Orleans, or any point below the city of Memphis, having on board, on her arrival within the quarantine limits, or having had on board at any time during her voyage, a greater number of deck or

City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.

263 Mo. 507 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 25, 1915

Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant,” decided at this' term. … J., and Woodson and Brown, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in an opinion filed in 17254, in which Bond and Faris, JJ., concur.

Davidson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

301 Mo. 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1923

[Mangold v. Bacon, 237 Mo. l. c. 511, paragraph 2 on pages 511 et seq. and cases cited. See also dissenting opinion in the Mangold Case, 237 Mo. l. c. 525.] II. … Judge Brown concludes by citing approvingly Neth v. Delano, 184 Mo.

State Ex Rel. Keitel v. Harris

353 Mo. 1043 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 1945

This was held of the former State Board of Mediation and. … A., unless otherwise indicated, 2 Lucas v. Murphy, 348 Mo. 1078, 1082 , 156 S. W. (2d) 686, 688 ; Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Comp. Comm., 348 Mo. 147, 162 , 152 S. W. (2d) 184, 191 ; Streckfus Steamers v.

President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Gaming Commission

13 S.W.3d 635 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 2000

City of Marshfield v. Brown, 337 Mo. 1136 , 88 S.W.2d 339, 340 (1935). The Highway Patrol reimbursements are a fee that is reasonably related to the administrative costs. … See id. at 498-99; City of Warrensburg v. Board of Regents of Central Missouri State University, 562 S.W.2d 340, 343-44 (Mo. banc 1978).

Rambo v. Lawson

799 S.W.2d 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1990

I believe that O'Grady v. Brown, 654 S.W.2d 904 (Mo. banc 1983), is incorrect. On the rationale employed by the principal opinion in this case O'Grady should be overruled. … Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. Southworth, 704 S.W.2d 219, 224 (Mo. banc 1986).

Meredith v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

467 S.W.2d 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 10, 1971

Respondent, in support of the trial court’s ruling, relies primarily upon the decision of the court en banc in Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo.Sup., 421 S.W.2d 255 . … Under the authority of Brown v. St.

Southers v. City of Farmington

263 S.W.3d 603 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 30, 2008

duties as board members except gross negligence.” … Davis, 193 S.W.3d at 763 (citing *619 Brown v. Tate, 888 S.W.2d 413, 415 (Mo.App.1994)).

Automobile Club of Missouri v. City of St. Louis

334 S.W.2d 355 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1960

In Board of Commissioners of City of Newark v. … City of Muskegon, 305 Mich. 676 , 9 N.W.2d 889 ; Board of Commissioners of City of Newark v. Local Government Board, 1945, 133 N.J.L. 513 , 45 A.2d 139 .

Seymour v. Citizens' Railway Co.

114 Mo. 266 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 27, 1893

Burns v. Railroad, 50 Mo. 139 ; Railroad v. Walling, 97 Pa. St. 55; Maguire v. Railroad, 115 Mass. 239 ; Railroad v. May, 27 American & English Railroad Cases, 151; Meesel v. Railroad, 8 Allen, 234 ; Nolan v. … . *273 In Geitz v. Railroad, 72 Wis. 307 , the plaintiff took passage on an open street railroad ear. The seats were all occupied, and passengers were standing upon the foot-boards running from platform to platform.

Erdman v. Auer

444 S.W.2d 427 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1969

Kansas City v. … Bohon, 349 Mo. 667 , 162 S.W.2d 867, 871 [9]; Butler v. Board of Education, Mo., 16 S.W.2d 44 , 45 [6].

Ex Parte Albright v. Clinger

290 Mo. 83 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 8, 1921

Upon being apprised of relator’s violation of his parole, the Board of Prison Managers of that State revoked same. At the time his whereabouts were unknown to the board. … [Kurtz v. State, 22 Fla. 36 .]

State Ex Rel. Harry L. Hussman Refrigerator & Supply Co. v. City of St. Louis

319 Mo. 497 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1928

In Pitman v. … Attorney-General v.

State Ex Rel. Kersey v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

304 Mo. 207 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1924

[State ex rel. v. Burrough, 174 Mo. 700 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 1 ; State ex rel. v. Linney, 192 Mo. l. c. 52, 53; State ex rel. v. Williams, 216 S. W. 535 .] The question in State ex rel. v. … [Kostuba v. Miller, 137 Mo. l. c. 173.]

State v. Priesmeyer

327 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1931

He signed his name Frank Brown. The defendants offered evidence to show that there was a Frank Brown, and the State offered evidence to show there was no such person. … [State v. Buckley, 318 Mo. 25 ; State v. Forshee, 199 Mo. 145 ; State v. Strait, 279 S. W. 109 ; 16 C. J. 661-2.]

Schoettgen v. Wilson

48 Mo. 253 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1871

(Reed v. Conway, 29 Mo. 221 ; Pike v. Megoun, 44 Mo. 491 ; Caulfield v. Bullock, 18 B. Monr. 494.) In the well-known case of Wilkes v. … (Wall v. McNamara, 2 Carr. & P. 158 and note.) In Jenkins v.

Schneider Granite Co. v. Independent Breweries Co.

258 Mo. 378 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1914

.- — The controlling facts of this case (except as herein-below noted) are the same as those involved in the case of The Schneider Granite Company v. … of public improvements their written remonstrance against the proposed improvement or against the material or manner thereof, the board shall consider such remonstrance, and if said board shall, by a two-thirds vote at a