Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmesuperct

1,749 results

1.23s

  • Mad Gold, LLC v. School Administrative District 51

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 2, 2018

    Moody v. … See Herrle v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Town of Windham v. Wehner

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 26, 2015

    31 20.00 620.00 Gumby A072336-boarding 3! … EXHIBIT ~ --~~- 1c.v ··V{ -&o 3 Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland Invoice PO Box 336

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 517 Ocean House LLC v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 27, 2017

    Coker v. City ofLewiston, 1998 ME 93 ,r 6, 710 A.2d 909; Isis Development LLC v. … See Kane v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Baker v. Maine Land Use Reg. Comm'n

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 11, 2008

    Brown v. Dep't of Manpower Affairs, 426 A.2d 880, 888 (Me. 1981). Unlike deadlines set by court rule, judicial enlargement of a jurisdictional time period is not permissible. City of Lewiston v. … Browne Scott D.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 2047 Associates, LLC v. City of Saco

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 3, 2017

    Store, LLC v. Dep 't of Envtl. Prot., 2011 ME 6, ,r 8, 10 A.3d 722. … Further, where an appellant claims a finding is not supported by the evidence, the appellant must provide "a complete record of all the evidence on which the Board relied." Time Enough v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Manougian v. Ejdys

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 6, 2003

    Brown bought the property in 1962, Ms. … Striefel v. Charles-Keyte-Leaman Partnership, et al.. 733 A.2d 984 (Me. 1999). The Manougians seriously dispute three of the necessary elements of an adverse possession claim, whether Ms.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Communications Workers of America v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 5, 2018

    M Bronson v Fairpoint Logistics Inc 31 2015 C.04255 Brown, Ann M Ann M Brown v Fairpoint Logistics Inc 32 2015 C 04257 Brown, Dawn L Dawn L Brown v Fairpoint Logistics Inc 33 2015 C … 04259 Brown, Jenna M Jenna M Brown v Fairpoint Logistics Inc 34 2015 C 04262 Brown, Marie T Marie T Brown v Fairpoint Logistics Inc 35 2015 C 04264 Brown, Rita A Rita A Brown v Fairpoint

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Chrysler Group, LLC v. Dunlap

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 27, 2016

    FCA US LLC v. … Furthermore, the Board pointed to Darling's v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Piampiano v. Town of Cumberland

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 29, 2020

    Appellate Review Factual determinations made by a local planning board or board of appeals will only be overturned if they are not adequately supported by evidence in the record. Jordan v. … See MC Associates v. Town of Cape Elizabeth, 2001 ME 89 ,r 16, 773 A.2d 439; Wyer v. Board of Environmental Protection, 2000 ME 45 ,r 1,747 A.2d 192.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Appletree Cottage, LLC v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 27, 2016

    Aydelott v. City of Portland, 2010 ME 25, <JI 10, 990 A.2d 1024; Mills v. Town of Eliot, 2008 ME 134, <JI 18, 955 A.2d 258. Interpretation of a zoning ordinance by a board is reviewed de novo. See Isis Dev., LLC v. … Wells v. Portland Yacht Club, 2001 ME 20, q[ 10, 771 A.2d 371 (citation omitted); see Forester v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Friends of Mitchell Field v. Town of Harpswell

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 5, 2018

    See Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490,511 (1975). … Maine law does not compel either a municipal board or a school board to schedule a revote upon petition by voters on an issue that has already been acted on by the electorate. See Heald v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • MSR Recycling LLC v. Weeks and Hutchins, LLC

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 9, 2018

    Lougee Conservancy v. … See id.; Town of Pownal v. Emerson, 639 A.2d 619, 620 (Me. 1994); Town of Mount Desert v. Smith, 2000 ME 88, 9I 3, 751 A.2d 445.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Scott v. Fall Line Condominium Association

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 4, 2018

    Weinstein is a member of the Board ergo he wr1s ncting in his capacity as a Board member. The determination is not that simple. Cf Holland v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sebago Lake Lodge Condo Owners Assoc. v. Herman

    Superior Court of Maine · May 3, 2021

    Servs. v. Murphy, 2011 ME 59, ! 9, 19 A.3d 815. … Rutland v. Mullen, 2002 ME 98,, 13,798 A.2d 1104.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Reay Excavation & Trucking, Inc. v. Town of Readfield

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2017

    Bizier v. Town of Turner, 2011 ME 116, 8, 32 A. 3d 1048. … Dresden, 531 A.2d 1023, 1024, n. 2 (Me. 1987); Butler v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Totman-Berube v. Maine Public Employees Retirement Sys.

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 12, 2015

    See Friends ofMaine's Mountains v. … Baker's Table, Inc. v. City ofPortland, 2000 :ME 7, ~ 9, 743 A.2d 237. In Hale v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Fissmer v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 21, 2016

    The Board's conclusion as to what facts meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance are afforded great deference and "will only be overturned if it is not adequately supported by evidence in the record." Jordan v. … City of Ellsworth, 2003 ME 82, 'lI 8, 828 A.2d 768; See Herrick v. Town ofMechanic Falls, 673 A.2d 1348, 1349 (1996); Rudolph v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Anastos v. Town of Brunswick

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 7, 2010

    E.g., JOllllSOl1 v. McNeil, 2002 ME 99, <]I 8, 800 A.2d 702, 704. A contested fact is "material" if it could potentially affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law. Inkel v. … Co. v. Ulliv. of Maille, 555 A.2d 470,471 (Me. 1989).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • King v. Central Maine Medical Center

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 28, 2016

    Strong v. Bausman, 2015 Me. Super. LEXIS 110, at *6 (May 5, 2015), aff'd, Strong v. Brakeley, 2016 ME 60, 137 A.3d 1007. … See Efstathiou v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Jalbert v. Maine Public Employees Retirment System

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 16, 2015

    Petitioner then contends that the Board's reliance on the Medical Board's interpretation of the evidence flies in the face of common sense and does not support the Board's finding. (citing Kelley v. … These medical board memoranda exist "to inform the executive director and Board as to the medical board's view on the existence of a disability that would entitle an applicant to benefits." Kelley v. Me. Pub. Emps.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.