Case law

State of Maine v. Jesse P. Marquis

162 A.3d 818 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 25, 2017

State v. … and the gun case . . . and the position of that and also the red-brown stain on the floor. . . . [T]he fact she’s in the picture is just the fact she’s there.”

Wayne v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance

628 A.2d 644 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 1993

See McCullough v. … Brown Co. v. Gillen, 569 A.2d 1206, 1209 (Me.1990) (same). Damages for loss of “[prospective profits are allowable only if they can be estimated with reasonable certainty.” Ginn v.

Kelley v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services

591 A.2d 1300 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1991

Gulick v. Board of Environmental Protection, 452 A.2d 1202, 1207-1208 (Me.1982). IV. DHS argues on appeal that the lump sum portion of the judgment against Mr. … See Tapman v. Tapman, 544 A.2d 1265, 1268 (Me. 1988).

Hall v. Perry

87 Me. 569 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 14, 1895

See Robinson v. Adams, 62 Maine, 369; Barnes v. Barnes, 66 Maine, 286; Delafield v. Parish, 25 N. Y. 9 ; 1 Red. on Wills, 121-135; Schouler on Wills, § 68. … In May v.

Sprague v. Washburn

447 A.2d 784 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 8, 1982

Romei (orally), Brown, Tibbetts, Churchill & Romei, Machias, for Phineas Sprague. Alan D. Graves (orally), Machias, for Mildred Geel. Charles F. Washburn (orally), pro se. Michael R. … Connors v.

State of Maine v. James A. Reynolds

193 A.3d 168 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 21, 2018

State v. … State v. Brown, 780 P.2d 880, 885 (Wash. Ct.

Ulmer v. Lime Rock Railroad

66 L.R.A. 387 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 25, 1904

Co. v. … The earlier Iowa case of Bankhead v. Brown, 25 Iowa, 540 , is cited by the court in support of this doctrine.

Barnard v. Wheeler

24 Me. 412 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1844

If, however, the lien be in the nature of a pledge for a debt, according to some authorities, (Corlies v. … Shaw, however, in delivering the opinion of the Court, in Beckwith v.

Catherine E. Brochu v. Richard A. McLeod

148 A.3d 1220 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 20, 2016

v. … Cusack, 2008 ME 74, ¶ 4, 946 A.2d 414, and to spousal support arrearages, Brown v. Habrle, 2010 ME 72, ¶ 19, 1 A.3d 401.

State v. L D

320 A.2d 885 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 1974

Walker v. State, Me., 315 A.2d 855 (1974); State v. Campell, Me., 314 A.2d 398 (1974); State v. Harriman, Me., 259 A.2d 752 (1969). … Brown v. Gordon, 240 Cal.App.2d 659 , 49 Cal.Rptr. 901 (1966).

Department of Transportation v. Maine State Employees Ass'n, SEIU Local 1989

1999 Me. 7 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 6, 1999

Employees, Council 93 v. City of Portland, 675 A.2d 100, 102 (Me.1996). An arbitrator’s award will be overturned, however, when he exceeds his powers by contravening public policy. See Department of Transp. v. … See Department of Transp. v.

Stenzel v. Dell, Inc.

870 A.2d 133 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 2005

Cross Co. v. … In re Halliburton Co. & Brown & Root Energy Servs., 80 S.W.3d 566, 572 (Tex.2002). Unconscionability is a defense to the enforcement of an arbitration provision. Id.

Gerrish v. Chambers

135 Me. 70 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 11, 1937

Savings Institution v. Johnston and Jose, 133 Me., 445, 180 A., 322 ; Meader v. Cummings, 131 Me., 445, 163 A., 792 ; Adams v. Ketchum, 129 Me., 212, 151 A., 146 ; Merryman v. Jones, 126 Me., 130, 131, 136 A., 667 . … Burnham v. Heselton, 82 Me., 495, 500, 20 A., 80 ; Eldridge v. May, 129 Me., 112, 116, 150 A., 378 ; Mallett v. Hall, 129 Me., 148, 153, 150 A., 531 . The defendants insist that the money which Mrs.

State v. Janisczak

579 A.2d 736 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1990

See Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, 452 U.S. 640, 647-48 , 101 S.Ct. 2559, 2563-64 , 69 L.Ed.2d 298, 306-07 (1981) (quoting Virginia Pharmacy Board v. … See also Gooding v.

Twin Island Development Corp. v. Winchester

512 A.2d 319 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 3, 1986

Stevens [v. Frost, 140 Me. 1, 7 , 32 A.2d 164, 167-68 (1943) ]. Apparent authority exists only when the “conduct of the principal leads a third person to believe that a given party is his agent.” Brown v. … See Toler v.

Webb v. Portland & Kennebec Railroad

57 Me. 117 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1869

The contrary doctrine was maintained in Patterson v. … And in Shaw v. Boston Worcester R. R.

Leeber v. Deltona Corp.

546 A.2d 452 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 19, 1988

Meyer, 383 So.2d 747, 748 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1980); South Florida Regional Planning Council v. Board of County Comm’rs, 372 So.2d 1142, 1144-45 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1979). See also Hutchison v. … Johnson v.

Wilton Woolen Co. v. G. H. Bass & Co.

112 Me. 483 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1914

Oakland Woolen Co. v. Gas Co., 101 Maine, 198. The grant to Fernald was unlimited and unrestricted. … Carleton Mills Co. v. Silver, 82 Maine, 215; Oakland Woolen Co. v. Gas Co., 101 Maine, 198, supra. Any other rule would seem to be an assumption of arbitrary power on the part of the Court.

State of Maine v. Duane Marquis

290 A.3d 96 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 2023

State v. Vainio, 466 A.2d 471, 474 (Me. 1983). … See Greenleaf, 2004 ME 149, ¶ 13, 863 A.2d 877; State v.

State v. Mahaney

437 A.2d 613 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 1, 1981

In State v. … State v. Perfetto, Me., 424 A.2d 1095, 1097 (1981); State v. Brown, Me., 410 A.2d 1033, 1034 (1980).