Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersme

5,972 results

1.78s

  • Ouellette v. Ouellette

    687 A.2d 242 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1996

    See, e.g., Board v. Board, 690 S.W.2d 380 (Ky.1985). We referred to that approach, in dictum, in Traylor v. … In Palow v. Kitchin, 149 Me. 113 , 99 A.2d 305 (1953), we decided that a father was entitled to a credit on child support payments for money paid to his ex-wife pursuant to an allowance for military dependents.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Inhabitants of Machias v. Inhabitants of East Machias

    116 Me. 423 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 17, 1917

    Perley v. Oldtown, 49 Maine, 31-34. … Portland v. Bangor, 42 Maine, 403, 410; Bishop v. Hermon, before cited.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Downing v. Department of Transportation

    34 A.3d 1150 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2012

    Bo wie v. … See Baker v. S.D. Warren Co., 2010 ME 87, ¶ 10 , 3 A.3d 380 (giving deference to Board decisions interpreting Board Rules).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • O'Donovan v. McIntosh

    728 A.2d 681 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 3, 1999

    . [¶ 5] Black Bear filed an application for subdivision approval with the Town of Fal-mouth Planning Board. In January 1996, the Board held the first in a series of open public meetings to address the application. … The Board eventually suspended the application after a dispute arose regarding the transferability of the easement. [¶ 6] After the Board suspended the proposal, O’Donovan, in May 1997, filed a complaint against McIntosh

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Preston

    411 A.2d 402 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1980

    . *407 In Orozco , defendant was questioned by the police in his boarding house bedroom at four o’clock in the morning. … See also, concurring opinion of White, J., and opinion of Powell, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, in Brown v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Frothingham v. Maxim

    127 Me. 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 14, 1928

    Hoxie v. Weston, 19 Maine, 322, 329; County of Washington v. Brown, 33 Maine, 442; Packard v. Brewster, 59 Maine, 404; Farmington v. Hohert, 74 Maine, 416; Carleton v. Bird, 94 Maine, 182. … Sibley v. Brown, 15 Maine, 185; Gower v. Emery, 18 Maine, 79; Lothrop v. Arnold, 25 Maine, 136.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hurd v. Maine Mutual Fire Insurance

    139 Me. 103 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 27, 1942

    See Brown v. Franklin Mutual Fire Insurance Company, supra; McQuaid v. Aetna Insurance Company, supra. … The Commercial Mutual Marine Insurance Company v. The Union Mutual Insurance Company of N. Y., 19 How., 318 , 15 Law ed., 636; Brown v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Cox v. COASTAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC.

    774 A.2d 347 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 2, 2001

    See, e.g., Moreau v. Zayre Corp., 408 A.2d 1289, 1293 (Me.1979). Indeed, the dual purpose and deviation doctrines are expressly included in the fourth factor of the Comeau analysis. … The entry is: Decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed. .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barnett v. State

    36 Me. 198 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

    State v. Robinson, 33 Maine, 564; State v. Gurney, 33 Maine, 526. But it was contended at the argument, that error will not lie in this case, because the accused might have appealed from the judgment. … Brown v. Jewell, 33 Maine, 250; Monk v. Guild, 3 Met. 372 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pierce v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad

    94 Me. 171 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 22, 1900

    boarded, although the lower boards were removed from time to time as the plaintiff had occasion to do so for the purpose of putting in or taking out these knees. … In Lowney v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bernier Ex Rel. Bernier v. State

    265 A.2d 604 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 20, 1970

    Revocation is by the State Probation and Parole Board after hearing. 34 M.R.S.A. § 1675. Hearing on revocation either of probation or parole, however, is not required under the Constitution. Mottram v. … State, Me., 232 A.2d 809 (parole); State v. Oliver, Me., 247 A.2d 122 (probation). It is to be noted that this is not an administrative transfer from the Center to the Reformatory for Men. See Shone v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Friends of the Motherhouse v. City of Portland

    152 A.3d 159 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 2016

    v. CITY OF PORTLAND et al. … Remmel v. City of Portland, 2014 ME 114, ¶ 11, 102 A.3d 1168 (quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seele v. Inhabitants of Deering

    79 Me. 343 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1887

    Co. v. … Morrison v. Lawrence, 98 Mass. 219 . So a town is not liable for the unauthorized and illegal acts of its officers even when acting within the scope of their duties. Brown v. Vinalhaven, 65 Maine, 402; Small v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Moscone v. Andrews

    600 A.2d 107 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 12, 1991

    In conformance with that settlement agreement, the Superi- or Court (Penobscot County, Browne, A.R.J.) entered summary judgment for defendants Philip R. Andrews, John M. … Defendants sought to enforce the settlement agreement by filing a counterclaim in the pending action, a manner of proceeding approved in Phillips v. Fuller, 541 A.2d 629 , 629 n. 1 (Me.1988).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bugbee v. Sargent

    23 Me. 269 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1843

    Townson v. Tickell, 3 B. & A. 31; Doe v. Smyth, 6 B. & C. 112. … Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 John. Ch. R. 157; Varick v. Smith, 5 Paige, 160 . It is further insisted, that it is a fishing bill, and that it does not show, that the plaintiffs have not an adequate remedy at law.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Franklin v. Erickson

    128 Me. 181 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 1, 1929

    Parker v. Huntington et al, 2 Gray, 124 ; Hayward v. Draper, 3 Allen, 551 ; Carew v. Rutherford, 106 Mass., 1 ; Rice v. Coolidge, 121 Mass., 393 ; Boston v. Simmons, 150 Mass., 463 ; Page v. Parker , 43 N. … H., 363; Stevens v. Rowe, 59 N. H., 578; National Fireproofing Co. v. Mason Builders Ass’n, 169 Fed., 259 , 26 L. R. A. (N. S.), 148; Brown & Allen v. Jacobs Pharmacy Co., 115 Ga., 429 , 57 L. R. A., 547; Kimball v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of Bangor v. Local 926, Council 74, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees

    430 A.2d 41 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 1, 1981

    Third, citing Board of Directors of Maine School Administrative District No. 33 v. … Laughlin v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schroeder v. Rynel, Ltd., Inc.

    720 A.2d 1164 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 9, 1998

    The Board of Directors was reconfigured to include Sehroeder, and Sehroeder agreed to these conditions. [¶ 5] Beginning in January 1997 Sehroeder made demands for “past due compensation” to the Board of Directors and the … Greenvall v. Maine Mutual Fire Ins.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Grant v. Central Maine Power Co.

    828 A.2d 800 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 25, 2003

    The entry is: Decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed. . … CMP relies on Davis v. Scott Paper Co., 507 A.2d 581, 584 (Me.1986) in support of its contention that it is not in violation of section 205(9) because it is taking an authorized offset. Davis is easily distinguishable.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grace v. Maine Employment Security Commission

    398 A.2d 1233 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 19, 1979

    The instant case is similar to Frye v. … Garon v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.