Case law

White v. Mann

26 Me. 361 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1846

Rawson v. Johnson, 1 East, 202; Low v. Marshall, 17 Maine R. 232. … Lancashire v. Killingworth, Salk. 623; Philips v. Hugre, Cro. Jac. 13; 2 Saund. 350, note 3. This is proved by the testimony of R. C. Johnson.

Camp Emoh Associates v. Inhabitants of Lyman

132 Me. 67 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 1933

S., snpra; Ferry Beach Park Ass’n v. City of Saco, 127 Me., 136, 142 A., 65 . … The same persons apparently comprised the boards of directors- of the grantor and grantee cor *69 porations.

Methodist Church v. Fairbanks

124 Me. 187 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1924

Shaw v. Hussey, 41 Maine, 495; Hall v. Preble, 68 Maine, 101; Jones v. Bacon, 68 Maine, 34; Gregg v. Bailey, supra. … Brown, 88 Maine, 56; “so much as remains,” Bradley v. Warren, 104 Maine, 423. *189 The language of the will in the case at bar is especially emphatic.

Young v. Central Maine Power Co.

814 A.2d 998 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 23, 2003

Lewiston Daily Sun v. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 43, 1999 ME 143, ¶ 17 , 738 A.2d 1239, 1243 (quoting Halfway House, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Toothaker v.

Whitten v. Hanson

35 Me. 435 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

As it was not the intention to leave any surplus, but to divide the whole land, the case falls within the principle of Brown v. Gay, 8 Greenl. 126, and Mosher v. Berry, 30 Maine, 83.

Wilson v. Grand Trunk Railway

56 Me. 60 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1868

In Cahill v. L. & N. W. Railway Co., 100 E. C. … In Smith v. Railroad, 44 N.

Carle v. Bangor & Piscataqis Canal & Railroad

43 Me. 269 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

Brown v. Maxwell, 6 Hill, 592 ; Coon v. Syracuse and Utica R. R. Co., 6 Barb., 231 . … Farwell v. the Boston and Worcester R. Corp., 4 Met., 49 ; Hayes v. the Western R. Corp., 3 Cush., 270 ; King v. the Boston and Worcester R. Corp., 9 Cush., 112 .

State v. Fogg

107 Me. 177 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 5, 1910

State v. Sullivan, 83 Maine, 417 ; State v. Murdock, 71 Maine, 454 ; State v. … State v. Arsenault, 106 Maine, 192 ; State v. Ryan, 81 Maine, 107; Commonwealth v.

Midland Funding LLC v. Walton

155 A.3d 864 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 2, 2017

Windham Land Trust v. Jeffords, 2009 ME 29, ¶ 19 , 967 A.2d 690 . “If the District Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, we would have to vacate its order.” Landmark Realty v. … Express Bank FSB v.

GLOBE SLICING MACHINE CO., INC. v. Casco Bank & Trust Co.

154 Me. 59 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 23, 1958

In re Brown (Black v. Hobart Mfg. Co.), D.C., 88 F.Supp. 297 . Under the Ohio law a conditional sales contract which is signed with a fictitious name is invalid against a subsequent lien. It appears that one Raymond A. … Brown." The Referee in Bankruptcy found the contract invalid as against third persons. The petitioner claimed that the bankrupt Brown did business under the name of Food Center Super Market.

Laughlin v. City of Portland

111 Me. 486 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 1914

Brown v. Gerald, 100 Maine, 351; Hayford v. … Lowell v. Boston, 111 Mass., 454 ; Opin. of Justices, 211 Mass., 626 ; Brown v. Gerald, 100 Maine, 351.

Teresa Sands v. Donald E. Thomas

162 A.3d 226 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 18, 2017

See Rothstein v. … Farr, Esq., Gilbert & Greif, P.A., Bangor, for appellant Teresa Sands Donald Brown, Esq., Don Brown Law, Brewer, for appellee Donald Thomas Penobscot County Superior Court docket number CV-2014-104 FOR CLERK REFERENCE

Candy A. (Bridges) Littell v. Cole G. Bridges

2023 ME 29 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 11, 2023

Spooner v. Spooner, 2004 ME 69, ¶ 8, 850 A.2d 354. … Brown, Esq., Don Brown Law, P.C., Brewer, for appellee Candy A. Bridges Calais District Court docket number FM-2020-5 For Clerk Reference Only 8 We note that the trial judge in this case has since retired.

Foster v. Foster

609 A.2d 1171 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 26, 1992

In its divorce order, the Superior Court (Hancock County, Browne, A.R.J.) applied the agreement and awarded plaintiff $50,-000 in lieu of her marital property rights. … See Estate of Berzinis, 505 A.2d 86 (Me.1986) (antenuptial agreement did not refer to death but used terms suggestive of divorce, so did not apply to wife’s inheritance rights); Parkhurst v.

Tarbox v. Fisher

50 Me. 236 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1863

Adams v. Adams, 10 Met., 170 . Nor is there any injustice in this. … Brown v. Hodgdon, 31 Maine, 65; Washburn v. Washburn, 10 Pick., 374 .

Mason v. Mason

67 Me. 546 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 6, 1878

In Brown v. Leach (35 Maine, 39) he was to maintain the mortgagee on the farm and keep it in good order. *548 In Norton v. … In Bryant v.

Horr v. Jones

157 Me. 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 1961

Miller v. Hooper, 119 Me. 527, 528, 529 . … We would also, if the boards were open enough, put a knife blade into the timbers, or drive nails into them.

Prout v. Maine Employment Security Commission

462 A.2d 1177 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 22, 1983

School District No. 20 v. … ); Gale v.

Estate of Dennis R. Kay v. Estate of Douglas J. Wiggins

143 A.3d 1290 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 12, 2016

See Conrad v. … See Addy v.

Archer v. MDS Building, Inc.

841 A.2d 801 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 12, 2004

See Gibbs v. Fraser Paper, Ltd., 1997 ME 225 , ¶7, 703 A.2d 1256 , 1258. … The entry is: Decision of the hearing officer is vacated and remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.