Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
948 results
1.08s
216 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 28, 1963
ARE THE ACTS UPON WHICH THE COMPLAINT IS BASED WITHIN THE EXCEPTION TO SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FOR TORT CLAIMS? … Clearly, the acts here complained of relating to the content and the wording of the bulletins and advisories, were determinations made by administrators involving policy, judgment and discretion.
Cited 14 timesPublishedMcDaniel v. Packaging Corp of America
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Oct 27, 2020
Furthermore, as described above, acceptance was clearly manifested by performance when Elite began the work described. … Accordingly, they have not met their burden of rebutting the presumption established under § 23:1061(A)(3).
Cited 0 timesUnknownRevell v. Prince Preferred Hotels Shreveport L L C
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 31, 2023
Factors relevant to this inquiry include the following: [W]hether material issues of fact are at issue, whether there has been substantial prejudice, whether the grounds for default are clearly established … For a salaried employee to qualify under the statute, he or she “must be compensated on a salary basis” of no more than $684 per week. 29 C.F.R. § 541.600.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSmith v. China Manufacturers Alliance L L C
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jul 3, 2025
The LPLA’s exclusivity for claims against the manufacturer of an allegedly defective product is “well-established” under Louisiana law. Rivers v. Remington Arms Co., 2018 WL 746392, at *2 (E.D. La. … Evidence should only be excluded in limine where it is “clearly inadmissible on all potential grounds.” Hull v. Ford, 2008 WL 178890, at *1 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (citing Hawthorne Partners v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNordan-Lawton Oil and Gas Corp. of Texas v. Miller
272 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 22, 1967
The record clearly reflects, and lessee-operator admits, that well No. 5 was shut-in for a period of some 15 months, commencing around April 1, 1963, and ending May 30, 1964. … To determine this issue it is first necessary to resort to several well-established principles of law.
Cited 8 timesPublishedVolson v. U S Dept Veteran Affairs
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 17, 2020
Unlike Section 501 claims, the United States did not waive its sovereign immunity as to these claims. … In order to establish a prima facie case of employment discrimination based on disability under the Rehabilitation Act, Plaintiff must show: (1) that she is disabled; (2) that she is otherwise qualified to do her work;
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 16, 2026
If dismissal is sought for a jurisdictional defect that centers upon the lack of congressional waiver of the government’s sovereign immunity, resolution is never appropriate by way of summary judgment but must be … established Constitutional rights.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jul 9, 2025
Courts are also afforded the unusual power to pierce the veil of the factual allegations and dismiss those claims whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. Id. … RPDC does not qualify as a juridical person.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Dec 22, 2025
First, a plaintiff must establish a prima facie case.” Dabbasi, 107 F.4th at 505. … To establish a prima facie case for age and gender discrimination claims, a plaintiff must demonstrate the following: “‘(1) he was discharged; (2) he was qualified for the position; (3) he was within the protected class
Cited 0 timesUnknownLinn v. Ouachita American Job Center
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 29, 2025
ADA Legal Standard To establish a prima facie case of an ADA violation, a plaintiff must show that: (1) he is a “qualified individual with a disability”; (2) he was “excluded … The ADA generally prohibits an employer from “excluding or otherwise denying equal jobs or benefits to a qualified individual because of [a] known disability …”51 To establish a prima facie claim of a ADA claim,
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Oct 27, 2025
a prisoner must establish that his efforts to pursue a nonfrivolous action were hindered. … Under Louisiana law, an entity must qualify as a “juridical person,” which is defined as “an entity to which the law attributes personality, such as a corporation or partnership.” LA. CIV. CODE art. 24.
Cited 0 timesUnknown331 F. Supp. 3d 620 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Sep 20, 2018
There is sufficient evidence in the record to conclude that she clearly did not. Alternatively, Winn argues that La. Rev. … Winn also claims that the prosecution failed to establish that she had the requisite criminal intent to recklessly disregard the safety of others. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSingleton v. City Marshal Office of Monroe
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · May 29, 2020
Since Marshal Highshaw was clearly a supervisor, Singleton need only show the first four elements. … Section 1983 provides that any person who, under color of state law, deprives another of “any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws shall be liable to the party injured.” 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cited 0 timesUnknownWright v. United Parcel Service Inc (Ohio)
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 27, 2020
Wright was not Qualified for the Position UPS first asserts that Wright was not qualified for her position. … Wright responds that Small testified that Wright was qualified for the position. [Id., p. 46].
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Dec 7, 2020
Defendants contend that there is nothing in Wild’s report to establish Heidi Moon is qualified to diagnose “gangrene” or otherwise qualified to provide medical opinions. … Defendants contend that Wild clearly makes a credibility assessment, which should be stricken and excluded.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBeachem v. LaSalle Corrections L L C
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 27, 2024
Before Williams’ death, he had two asthma attacks that Defendants clearly ignored. … Immateriality is established by showing that the challenged allegations can have no possible bearing on the subject matter of the litigation.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 21, 2026
Courts are also afforded the unusual power to pierce the veil of the factual allegations and dismiss those claims whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. B. … In , 509 U.S. 25, 35–36 (1993), the United States Supreme Court established a two-part test to state a viable claim regarding environmental tobacco smoke (“ETS”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHornsby-Goynes v. U S A A Casualty Insurance Co
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Apr 1, 2021
Hornsby asserts USAA bears the burden of establishing the documents were obtained or prepared in anticipation of litigation and proving they are confidential. at 10-11. … Here, USAA establishes it produced the factual material in its claims files with relatively few redactions made after litigation was filed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jun 24, 2026
Section 1225(b)(2)(A) further provides that, if an immigration officer determines that such an applicant for admission is not clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to admission, the alien “shall be detained” pending removal … Similarly, although Rodriguez-Guevara obtained approval of a Form I-360 SIJ petition, SIJ classification does not itself confer lawful immigration status, lawful permanent residence, or immunity from removal proceedings
Cited 0 timesUnknown58 F.2d 1042 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jul 30, 1931
Unquestionably, a very unfortunate situation has been created by the circumstances above detailed, but the court must attempt'to dispose of it under established rules of law and practice. … The receiver qualified and went into physical possession on March 30,-1916.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna