Case law

Caddo Parish School Board v. City of Shreveport

254 So. 2d 85 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 12, 1971

Torrance v. City of Shreveport, 231 La. 840 , 93 So.2d 187 (1957); Deville v. City of Oakdale, 180 So.2d 556 (La.App., 3d Cir. 1965); Cloud v. Bushnell, 168 So.2d 275 (La.App., 3d Cir. 1964-writ denied); Gautreau v. … Watkins v. Ouachita Parish School Board, 173 La. 259 , 136 So. 591 (1931); Lincoln Parish School Board v. Ruston College, 162 So.2d 419 (La.App, 2 Cir. 1964).

Standard Marine Insurance v. Board of Assessors

5 Teiss. 103 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1908

Plaintiff sues for a reduction and cancellation of its assessment, alleging that, notwtihstanding its sworn return made to the Board of Assessors for the Parish of Orleans, showing that it ozvned and held in the city of New … Orleans no property liable to assessment under the laws of this State, the said Board put upon the assessment rolls of the year 1906, the following items of assessment against it, to-wit: Money at interest, all credits,

Heirs of Hale v. Board of Assessors

2 McGl. 345 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1884

The aggregate sum fixed by the board of assessors is about $80,500.00 — the real estate is comprised of several properties situated in different parts of the city. … The testimony of the assessor shows that a more than usual care was observed in fixing the value given by the board, and that the reasons given for the conclusions adopted seems to us sound.

Brown ex rel. Children v. Homer Sargent, Evans Envtl. & Geological Sci. & Mgmt., LLC

241 So. 3d 1115 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 2018

See Adams v. Thomas, 98-2003, 98-2005, pp. 3-4 (La.4/13/99), 729 So.2d 1041 , 1043 ; Simms v. Butler , 97-0416, p. 2 (La. 12/2/97), 702 So.2d 686 , 687. … Brown designated excerpts from the deposition of Dr. Kuhns to be entered into evidence. Dr. Craig Kuhns, a board certified orthopedic surgeon, with whom Ms.

Foster v. Board of Elementary & Secondary Education

428 So. 2d 890 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 1983

On November 19, 1981, the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) ordered the transfer of the plaintiff to another school. In response thereto, petitioner filed suit in St. … R.S. 17:3 provides: “The board shall be domiciled in the city of Baton Rouge, parish of East Baton Rouge.” Ordinarily, suits would be brought at the domicile of the board under the general venue articles. La.C.C.P.

Louisiana Livestock Sanitary Board v. Manuel

333 So. 2d 348 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 26, 1976

Plaintiff’s next witness was Curtis Brown, an employee of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture. … A reconventional demand for damages was filed by Manuel against the Board but was not decided. The reconventional demand has apparently been abandoned as a result of the decision in Johnson v.

Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Tackett

71 So. 2d 137 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1954

by this court in the recent, case of State Board of Medical Examiners v. … The constitutionality of Section 13 of Act No. 56 of 1914 was upheld by the Supreme Court in Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Cronk, 157 La. 321, 322 , 102 So. 415 .

Mix v. Board of Supervisors of Elections

337 So. 2d 533 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1976

I agree the Board must hold its statutorily required open meeting and relator’s list must be refused as untimely submitted.

Villavicencio v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

543 So. 2d 575 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1989

The Villavicencios timely appealed the decision of the Finance Department to the New Orleans Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, (ABC Board). … It cites di Giovanni v. Parish of Jefferson, 222 So.2d 590 (La.App. 4th Cir.1969) and Food Town, Inc. v.

Talley v. St. Tammany Parish School Board

5 So. 3d 1060 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 2009

BETTY TALLEY v. ST. TAMMANY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, STATE OF LOUISIANA, ST. TAMMANY PARISH COUNCIL, AND BOARD OF ELECTION SUPERVISORS OF ST. TAMMANY PARISH No. 2008 CA 1947 Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit. … Tammany Parish School Board, the State of Louisiana, the St. Tammany Parish Council, and the Board of Election Supervisors of St. Tammany Parish. [1] On December 18, 2007, Ms.

Associated Gen. Contractors v. Calcasieu Parish School Board

572 So. 2d 623 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1991

Wallace v. Board of Education of Montgomery Country, 280 Ala. 635 , 197 So.2d 428 (1967); Philson v. City of Omaha, 167 Neb. 360 , 93 N.W.2d 13 (1958); Hillig v. City of St. Louis, 337 Mo. 291 , 85 S.W.2d 91 (1935). … Disposal Systems, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish School Board, 243 So.2d 915 (La.App.3d Cir.1971); Lincoln Parish School Board v.

McCready v. Ouachita Parish School Board

586 So. 2d 683 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1991

Plaintiffs sued the Ouachita Parish School Board as lessor-owner of Ouachita Parish Junior High School. The Board had leased the school cafeteria to Mervyn’s during the summer. … As stated by the Supreme Court in Rosell v.

Benoit v. Terrebonne Parish School Board

482 So. 2d 721 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1985

, and insured by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, the Board’s insurer. … Smith v. Andrepont, 378 So.2d 479 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979), writ denied, 380 So.2d 102 (La.1980); Brown v. Southern Farm Bureau Ins. Co., 426 So.2d 684 (La.App. 1st Cir.1982). Appellants contend that in light of Mr.

Scroggins v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans

533 So. 2d 132 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 1988

SCROGGINS v. SEWERAGE & WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS and the City of New Orleans. No. 88-CA-0349. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. October 11, 1988. Harry P. … Entrevia v. Hood, supra; Maltzahn v. City of New Orleans, supra.

Gordon v. Louisiana State University Board of Supervisors

669 So. 2d 736 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 1996

BROWN, J., dissents and assigns reasons. . We note that Butts v. Cummings, supra, deals with a medical malpractice claim arising from damage to a newborn caused by elevated biliru-bin. See also Stracener v. … Brown, 345 So.2d 1282 (La.App. 3d Cir.1977).

City of New Orleans v. Board of Trustees

365 So. 2d 882 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1978

by the Board in the implementation of those guidelines on September 29 and October 12, 1977. … The court further noted that R.S. 33:2103 provides that “[t]he Board shall assess each member of the Fire Department not less than 5% of his salary” and, beginning July 1, 1973, “the Board shall assess each member of the

Comeaux v. Acadia Parish School Board

9 La.App. 3 Cir. 109 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 2009

Toston v. Pardon, 03-1747 (La.4/23/04), 874 So.2d 791 . Fontenot v. Patterson Ins., 06-1624, 06-1625, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/18/09), 5 So.3d 954 . … Finally, we turn now to the Co-meauxs’ motion to strike a copy of a proposed stipulation attached to the School Board’s brief to this court.

Carpenter v. Catahoula Parish School Board

566 So. 2d 1013 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 1990

See Brown v. Red River Parish School Board, 488 So.2d 1132 (La.App. 2d Cir.1986). See also, Jackson v. St. … See Brown v. Red River Parish School Board, 469 So.2d 1110 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985); Brown v. Red River Parish School Board, 488 So.2d 1132 (La.App. 2d Cir.1986).

Orleans Parish School Board v. Lexington Insurance Co.

2011 La.App. 4 Cir. 1753 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 2012

BAGNERIS, SR., Judge. hThe plaintiff, Orleans Parish School Board and intervenors, Recovery School District, the Louisiana Department of Education, and the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, appeal the partial motion … Dore v. Brignac, 00-1719, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/20/01), 791 So.2d 736, 738 .

Rucker v. St. Bernard Parish School Board

144 So. 2d 481 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1962

On trial of the case the defendant School Board made no effort to show that a written recommendation for the discharge was submitted to the School Board, but contended that Willie Rucker obtained his employment by fraudulent … The trial court held that “no valid contract of employment existed between the school board and plaintiff and therefore the school board was not bound by the provisions relative to the tenure of bus operators and was within