Opinion

Mix v. Board of Supervisors of Elections

  • 337 So. 2d 533
  • 1976 La. App. LEXIS 3897
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Sep 20, 1976
Status
Published
Author
Samuel
On the bench
Beer, Boutall, Gulotta, Lem, Lemmon, Mon, Morial, Redmann, Samuel, Schott, Stoulig
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

SAMUEL, Judge

(concurring).

I agree the Board must hold its statutorily required open meeting and relator’s list must be refused as untimely submitted. However, I would dismiss the suit on the ground that relator has failed to prove he has not been afforded the one Republican commissioner in each voting precinct he claims as a matter of right under the statute. As correctly stated in footnote 2 of the majority opinion, both Republicans and Democrats are included in the commissioners timely submitted by the other candidates and, quite clearly, it was relator’s burden to allege and prove there were one or more voting precincts in which there was no Republican commissioner.

Accordingly, I respectfully concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.