Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilsd

3,189 results

1.95s

  • Hurtado

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 15, 2026

    On March 7, 2023, Hurtado appealed the grievance to the Administrative Review Board (“ARB”), despite receiving a favorable ruling by the grievance officer. … French v. Heyne, 547 F.2d 994, 997 (1976) (citing Wojick v. Levitt, 513 F.2d 725 (7th Cir. 1975)). Flynn v. Thatcher, 819 F.3d 990, 991 (7th Cir. 2016).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Res. Capital Corp., S'holder Derivative Litig.

    286 F. Supp. 3d 619 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Feb 23, 2018

    "The corporate board's decision to deny the litigation demand receives the same business judgment rule presumption as any other board decision." Oliveira v. … Actually, only the independence of the full board is relevant, because "the decision to reject demand was made by the full Board." Stoner v. Walsh , 772 F.Supp. 790 , 801 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abuharba v. Asselmeier

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 18, 2023

    Plaintiff appealed the decision to the Administrative Review Board. Doc. 58, p. 8. … Brown v. Osmundson, 38 F. 4th 545, 559-60 (7th Cir. 2022) (internal citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mariah Boat, Inc. v. Laborers International Union

    19 F. Supp. 2d 893 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jun 17, 1998

    Buck Creek Coal, Inc. v. United Workers of America, 917 F.Supp. 601, 610 (S.D.Ind.1995). If the predicate acts were preempted, so was the RICO claim. See Id.; McDonough, 750 F.Supp. at 370-71 ; Brown v. Keystone Consol. … Buck Creek, 917 F.Supp. at 610-11 ; Brown, 680 F.Supp. at 1225 . A recent decision by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals muddied the water. In United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gross v. GFI Grp., Inc.

    310 F. Supp. 3d 384 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Apr 20, 2018

    The GFI Board appointed a special committee to evaluate the terms of the proposed CME transaction and explore potential alternative transactions. (Jan. Board Meeting Minutes, at 3; Ex. A.) … Five minutes after that vote, the GFI Board met to act on the special committee's recommendation. (Guglielmo Decl. Ex. 51 ("July Board Meeting Minutes"), at 1-2.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Criminal Division

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 7, 2020

    Banks v. Chicago Board of Education, 750 F.3d 663, 666 (7th Cir. 2014). … Brown v. Caraway, 719 F.3d 583, 586 (7th Cir. 2013); Brown v. Rios, 696 F.3d 638, 640 (7th Cir. 2012).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Res. Capital Corp. S'holder Derivative Litig. Demand Futile Actions

    308 F. Supp. 3d 761 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Apr 2, 2018

    Likewise, in Scalisi v. Fund Asset Mgmt. … Md. 2012) ("Simply being members of the board or the compensation committee and participating in the decision-making do not suffice"); Seidl v. Am.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grissom

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 18, 2025

    BROWN, ) and C/O LADANTE, ) ) … P. 41(b); Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). This dismissal shall NOT count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hoskins v. Mumbower

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 21, 2023

    Pinckneyville failed to respond to his grievances, he had no way of fully exhausting those grievances by sending them to the Page 2 of 5 Administrative Review Board … See Chambers v. Sood, 956 F.3d 979, 984 (7th Cir. 2020).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Medearis v. Pinckneyville CC

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 7, 2021

    Any portion of 1 The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to add Christine Brown and John Does, nurses, as defendants to the docket. … Ultimately, the Administrative Review Board found his grievance moot because he had received hearing aids and headphones. The Administrative Review Board stated that “once watch is received, you will get it.” (Id.).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Common Cause/N.Y. v. Brehm

    344 F. Supp. 3d 542 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 2018

    Conf. of the NAACP v. Browning , 522 F.3d 1153 , 1165-66 (11th Cir. 2008) (evaluating standing claim before turning to the merits in action challenging state statute's compliance with NVRA and HAVA). … In United States v. Board of Election Commissioners for the City of St. Louis , for example, the district court approved a consent decree in which the United States charged that the St.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nichols

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 3, 2025

    Myers v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 629 F.3d 639, 644 (7th Cir. 2010). The party offering the expert testimony bears the burden of proof as to relevance and reliability. Brown v. Burlington N. Santa Fe Ry. … He is licensed to practice medicine and is dual board certified by the American Board of Preventive Medicine in both public health/preventive medicine and addiction medicine. Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Yeager v. Office of the State Appellate Defender

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 27, 2022

    Blue v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 698 F.3d 587, 598 (7th Cir. 2012) (quoting Harrington v. City of Chicago, 433 F.3d 542, 546 (7th Cir. 2006)). … Olson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sanchez v. Beshears

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jul 23, 2020

    Because Sanchez was transferred out of Menard after the altercation with Brown, he sent his grievance directly to the Administrative Review Board (“ARB”). (Doc. 89-1, p. 1-2). … He was housed with Brown for only five days before the altercation.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Francisco Zepeda v. Wexford Health Care Sources, Inc., et al.

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 6, 2026

    See Brown v. Fromolz, 21-CV-542-BHL, 2024 WL 4527288, at *3 (E.D. Wis. … See Hacker v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co. v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.

    338 F. Supp. 636 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Feb 18, 1972

    Fredman v. … American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Helvey

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Apr 15, 2026

    See, e.g., Brown v. Sproul, No. 22-1218, 2022 WL 13909002, at *2 (S.D. Ill. Oct. 24, 2022); Reliford v. Bell, No. 17-562, 2019 WL 429293, at *3 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 1, 2019). … See Brown, 2021 WL 4206330, at *12.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Moore

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 14, 2026

    Plaintiff complains he tried to call the Prisoner Review Board’s attorney and Pritzker to solve the situation. (Id. at 6-7). … Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977); Casteel v. Pieschek, 3 F.3d 1050, 1053 (7th Cir. 1993). When analyzing claims for the denial of court access, the court uses a two-part test. Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

    349 F. Supp. 3d 282 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2018

    Mem. at 8 (citing Pall Corp. v. … See Royal Park v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. , 2018 WL 4682220 , at *5 (citing Ambac Ass. Corp. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Iowa Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.

    340 F. Supp. 3d 285 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 27, 2018

    Id. ; see also Burtch v. … Pension Fund v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.