Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilnd

10,000+ results

1.60s

  • Geder v. Roth

    765 F. Supp. 1357 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 27, 1991

    Defendants, as listed in plaintiff’s amended complaint, are Thomas Roth, warden of Stateville Corree- *1358 tional Center; Melvin Allen, grievance board hearing officer; Marilyn Duckworth, I-house clerk for the Stateville … As a last effort, Geder wrote to defendant Donahue and the Administrative Review Board which responded two months later to his request by denying him access to the law library.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Vision Church v. Village of Long Grove

    226 F.R.D. 323 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 3, 2005

    The Long Grove Board of Trustees (“Board”) then passed Ordinance 2001-0-32, involuntarily annexing the Property. … See Mercier v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bernstein v. Genesis Insurance

    90 F. Supp. 2d 932 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 16, 2000

    In September of 1997, DiPrima filed suit against GenDerm and two members of the Board of Directors alleging that they had wrongfully terminated his consulting agreement. Joel M. Appel et al. v. … Finally, DiPrima enclosed a list of business addresses and phone numbers for current board members for future use by Richard Bernstein.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Securities & Exchange Commission v. Roszak

    495 F. Supp. 2d 875 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 10, 2007

    See SEC v. … See U.S. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Paunescu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    76 F. Supp. 2d 896 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 2, 1999

    See, e.g., Alvidres-Reyes v. … Agbemaple v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Lopez v. Brackett Stripping Machine Co.

    303 F. Supp. 669 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 29, 1969

    Chicago & Illinois Midland Ry. v. Evans Construction Co., 32 Ill.2d 600 , 208 N.E.2d 573 , 19 A.L.R.3d 921 (1965); Muhlbauer v. Kruzel, 39 Ill.2d 226 , 234 N.E.2d 790 (1968). … See Board of Education of High School Dist. No. 88 v. Joseph J. Duffy Co., 97 Ill.App.2d 158 , 240 N.E.2d 5 (1968); Chicago Burlington & Quincy Ry. v. Admiral-Merchants Motor Freight Inc., 397 F.2d 472 (7th Cir.1968).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mosler v. M/K Ventures International Inc.

    103 F.R.D. 385 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 25, 1984

    Board of Regents, 711 F.2d 1387 , 1391 (7th Cir.1983) (a district court may refuse to allow amendment of a complaint when the proposed amendment fails to cure the deficiencies of the original complaint); Sarfaty v. … See Textor v. Board of Regents, 711 F.2d at 1391. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ motion to vacate order of sanctions is granted; and their motion for leave to file the proposed amended complaint is denied. So ordered.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. City of Chicago Heights

    161 F. Supp. 2d 819 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 21, 2001

    The ZBA is a seven-member board appointed by the mayor and the City Council. The Plan Commission is a nine-member board, appointed by the mayor. III. … V.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Czajkowski v. State of Ill.

    460 F. Supp. 1265 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 15, 1977

    Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … Parker v. Brown, supra; Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Codding, 423 F.Supp. 913 (N.D.Cal.1976). In addition to invoking the Parker v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Lakeside Foods, Inc.

    449 F. Supp. 171 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 9, 1978

    Plaintiff, in Count II of her amended complaint, asserts a claim against defendant for alleged violations of regulations 202.4(c)(4) and 202.4(a), 12 C.F.R. 202.4(c)(4) and (d) (1977), promulgated by the Board of Governors … National Metropolitan Bank v. United States, 323 U.S. 454, 456-57 , 65 S.Ct. 354 , 89 L.Ed. 383 (1945); Beal v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Corp., 312 U.S. 45, 51 , 61 S.Ct. 418 , 85 L.Ed. 577 (1941).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Glazer v. National Commodity Research & Statistical Services, Inc.

    388 F. Supp. 1341 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 5, 1974

    C. v. W. J. Howey Co., supra, at 298, 66 S.Ct. at 1103 . As the court noted in Wasnowic v. … Chicago Board of Trade, 352 F.Supp. 1066, 1070 (M.D.Pa.1972), aff’d, 491 F.2d 752 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 994 , 94 S.Ct. 2407 , 40 L.Ed.2d 773 (1974); see 15 U.S.C. § 77b(1) and 15 U.S.C. § 78c(a) (10); any

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Village of Plainfield

    918 F. Supp. 2d 753 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 16, 2013

    A Village Plan Commission would then review the plans and recommend to the Village President and Board of Trustees whether to approve the subdivision. … Aida Food & Liquor, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 439 F.3d 397, 402-03 (7th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks omitted); Del Marcelle v. Brown Cnty.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Earls-Rozelle

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 23, 2026

    Gross v. … Fischer v. Avanade, Inc., 519 F.3d 393, 403 (7th Cir. 2008) (quoting Brown v. Ill. Dep’t of Nat. Res., 499 F.3d 675, 683 (7th Cir. 2007)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cousins v. City Council of City of Chicago

    322 F. Supp. 428 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 22, 1971

    Wells v. Rockefeller, 311 F.Supp. 48 (S.D., N.Y., 1970), affd. 398 U.S. 901 , 90 S.Ct. 901 , 26 L.Ed.2d 60 (1970); WMCA, Inc. v. … Del., 1967), Meeks v. Avery, 251 F. Supp. 245 (D.C., Kan., 1966); Bush v. Martin, 251 F.Supp. 484 (D.C., Tex., 1966); Sims v. Baggett, 247 F.Supp. 96 (M.D., Ala., 1965).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • JCW Investments, Inc. v. Novelty, Inc.

    222 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 20, 2002

    Fred is a figure of a balding man in a white tank top, blue pants, and brown shoes, sitting in a green chair. … See Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S. 201, 217 , 74 S.Ct. 460, 470 , 98 L.Ed. 630 (1954); id. at 615 ; Reyher v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Roe

    720 F. Supp. 645 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 14, 1989

    The January 1989 Grand Jury is investigating possible violations of federal law by *646 persons associated with the Chicago Board of Trade. … We begin the analysis with a discussion of Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 , 96 S.Ct. 1569 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976), and United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Winder v. Leak

    790 F. Supp. 1403 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 7, 1992

    Subsequent to the Board’s finding that Winder “committed the prohibited acts,” he was placed in isolation for twelve days. … Moreover, the punishment was set by the Board, not the defendants.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Cincinnati Milling MacHine Co.

    254 F. Supp. 130 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 15, 1966

    Co. v. … In Knapp-Monarch Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Save-A-Life Foundation, Inc. v. Heimlich

    601 F. Supp. 2d 1005 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 9, 2009

    E.g., Brown v. Demco, Inc., 792 F.2d 478, 481-82 (5th Cir.1986); Phoenix Container, L.P. ex rel. Samarah v. Sokoloff, 83 F.Supp.2d 928, 932 (N.D.Ill.2000). … See Price v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States Ex Rel. Circella v. Neelly

    115 F. Supp. 615 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 21, 1953

    The Board relied upon U. S. ex rel. Volpe v. … Cf., Lauria v. United States, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.