Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilnd

10,000+ results

1.77s

  • ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Lisle-Woodridge Fire Prevention District

    799 F. Supp. 2d 880 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 20, 2011

    ADT, by contrast, uses a phone-based network that transmits signals to a transmission board at District, which is itself directly connected to Du-Comm’s fire alarm board (hence the term “direct connect”) (P. … Dist. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Architectural & Ornamental Iron Workers Local Union No. 63 v. International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local Union 2

    475 F. Supp. 2d 757 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 2, 2006

    Articles V and VI of the Standard Agreement create a “Joint Conference Board” (“JCB”) that is responsible for administering the Standard Agreement and for “the adjustment of jurisdictional disputes by arbitrators selected … In Boys Markets, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Richman v. Sheahan

    415 F. Supp. 2d 929 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 23, 2006

    Brown, 32 F.3d 236, 239 (7th Cir.1994); In re Air Crash Disaster at New Orleans, La., 795 F.2d 1230, 1234 (5th Cir.1986), 2 and the gatekeeping function Daubert has imposed on trial judges, there is scarcely a ease in which … The Training Board’s training curriculum was "developed based upon the legal propriety of peace officers[sic] use of force....” (Id., Ex. 3, Guidelines, at 3).

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Degeer v. Gillis

    842 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 19, 2012

    Neither of the cases defendants cite — Bakalis v. Bressler, 1 Ill.2d 72 , 115 N.E.2d 323 (1953), E.J. McKernan Co. v. … See Celotex Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • CSC Holdings, Inc. v. J.R.C. Products Inc.

    158 F. Supp. 2d 798 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 29, 2001

    See TKR Cable Co. v. Cable City Corp., 1996 WL 465508 , No. 96-2877 at *10 (D.N.J. Apr. 19, 1999) (Brown, J.); Time Warner Cable v. Freedom Elecs., 897 F.Supp. 1454, 1460 (S.D.Fla.1995) (citing Burlington N.R. Co. v. … , smart boards, test kits, chips, E proms and circuit boards. *816 27.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Drovers Bank of Chicago v. SFC CORP.

    452 F. Supp. 580 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 1978

    More specifically, the Federal Reserve Board (“Board”) at 42 F.R. 19350 , withdrew a proposed amendment which would have prohibited payment of higher interest rates on CD’s purchased with pooled funds. … Moreover, the instant facts are readily distinguishable from Securities and Exchange Commission v. Heritage Trust Co., 402 F.Supp. 744 (D.Ariz.1975) and Melton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamilton v. Peters

    919 F. Supp. 1168 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 19, 1996

    On December 13,1993, Hamilton appeared before IDOC’s administrative review board at Hill. … In Whitford v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McCarty

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 10, 2025

    See Brown v. Nat’l Bd. of Med. … See Corley v. Rosewood Care Ctr., Inc. of Peoria, 1 Although Cleveland deals with Social Security disability benefits, the Seventh Circuit has applied its analysis to statements made before a local pension board.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jannes v. Microwave Communications, Inc.

    57 F.R.D. 18 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 8, 1972

    Herpich v. Wallace, 430 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1970); see Liboff v. Wolfson, 437 F.2d 121 (5th Cir. 1971). … The same reasoning applies when a majority of the board of directors are controlled by the defendants, but more than mere conclusory allegations of control are necessary. Id.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • United States v. MYR Group, Inc.

    274 F. Supp. 2d 945 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 28, 2003

    The government now appeals Judge Brown’s ruling. I affirm her decision. I. A ruling on a motion to dismiss an indictment is a ruling on a question of law and subject to de novo review. United States v. … United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Palacz v. Village of Harwood Heights

    782 F. Supp. 2d 625 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 2, 2011

    of Fire and Police Commissioners (“the Board”). … Tamayo v. Blagojevich, 526 F.3d 1074, 1083 (7th Cir.2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Peralta v. El Tiburon, Inc.

    252 F. Supp. 3d 658 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 16, 2017

    The Affidavit describes Garcia as a Hispanic male, age 26, 6’9‘, 170 lbs., with black hair and brown eyes. … The first, J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

    395 F. Supp. 2d 738 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 11, 2005

    Brown v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, 355 F.Supp.2d 940, 942 (N.D.Ill.2005) (quoting Jordan v. Unites States Dep’t of Justice, 591 F.2d 753, 774 (D.C.Cir.1978) (en banc)). … Citing Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Friend v. Ancillia Systems Inc.

    68 F. Supp. 2d 969 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 21, 1999

    Villasenor v. Industrial Wire & Cable, Inc., 929 F.Supp. 310, 311 (N.D.Ill.1996). … Pittway Corp. v. United States, 102 F.3d 932, 934 (7th Cir.1996). Indeed, in Health Cost Control v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Fraternite Notre Dame, Inc. v. County Of McHenry

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 15, 2019

    Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Row & Maw, LLP, 719 F.3d 785, 797 (7th Cir. 2013). A proposed intervenor that “‘dragged its heels’ after learning of a lawsuit” cannot establish timeliness. Nissei Sangyo Am., Ltd. v. … See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pearson v. All Borg

    23 F. Supp. 837 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 28, 1938

    In Corker v. … In Fors v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers Union No. 63 v. Glaziers, Architectural Metal & Glass Workers Local Union No. 27

    40 F. Supp. 2d 997 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 26, 1999

    See Ryan v. DuPage Cty. Jury Comm’n, 105 F.3d 329, 330 (7th Cir.1996) (per curiam); Thompson v. Boggs, 33 F.3d 847, 856 (7th Cir.1994). … Alberici-Eby v. Local 520, 992 F.2d 727 , 734 (7th Cir.1993); cf. Chrysler Motors Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Greisz v. Household Bank (Illinois)

    8 F. Supp. 2d 1031 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 6, 1998

    “[I]n implementing TILA, Congress ‘delegated expansive authority to the Federal Reserve Board to elaborate and expand the legal framework governing commerce in credit.’ ” Alexander v. … “[T]he sufficiency of TILA-mandated disclosures is to be viewed from the standpoint of an ordinary consumer, not the perspective of a Federal Reserve Board member, federal judge, or English professor.” Cemail v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Calderon v. Reno

    39 F. Supp. 2d 943 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 3, 1998

    In Felker v. … See Ravindran v. INS, 976 F.2d 754, 762-68 (1st Cir.1992); Castaneda-Suarez, 993 F.2d at 144 . Calderon filed his notice of appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals on December 6, 1995.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Protect Our Parks v. Chicago Park District

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 19, 2019

    Ryan v. … Thus, Brown is neither controlling nor persuasive here. 6 6 Plaintiffs also cite Ngueyn ex rel. United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.