Case law

Woolums v. Huss

323 Ill. App. 3d 628 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 28, 2001

Schurman is not qualified to and does not make assertions that the CT plates showed osteomyelitis and that Dr. … Beekil, 183 Ill.2d 407, 422-24 , 233 Ill.Dec. 810 , 701 N.E.2d 1084, 1091-92 (1998), where the court first rejected the plaintiffs' claims that a cause of action existed for fear of contracting acquired immune deficiency

Village of Hazel Crest v. Illinois Labor Relations Board

385 Ill. App. 3d 109 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 26, 2008

First-Line Supervisors, [i.e.,] patrol sergeants and personnel designated as Shift Commanders[,] may: Provide training for subordinates if the supervisor is qualified and work conditions make it practical; Recommend training … This situation typically arises where the historical facts are not in dispute and the issue is whether the established facts satisfy the statutory standard. Cinkus, 228 Ill. 2d at 210 .

Lubin v. Goldblatt Bros., Inc.

37 Ill. App. 2d 437 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 29, 1962

The Appellate Court, in holding that it was error to deny a directed verdict, stated that "the testimony to the effect that the one-half inch metal stair nosing was `shiny' and `slippery' clearly did not establish that the … I also believe that plaintiff failed to introduce any evidence to establish due care on her own part.

United City of Yorkville v. SUGAR GROVE

376 Ill. App. 3d 9 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 24, 2007

The boundary line in the Yorkville Agreement was established in light of their then-existing corporate limits. … “Predictions usually do not qualify as such present facts [citation], and mistaken predictions will not invalidate a contract.” Corcoran, 345 Ill. App. 3d at 454 .

Blackhawk Production Credit Ass'n v. Bay

69 Ill. App. 3d 239 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 16, 1979

If the farmer has otherwise qualified he must, in order to obtain a loan, malee an investment in the Association, which in the case of Blackhawk is a purchase of *5 in stock and a deposit of *5 in a capital reserve account … the manifest weight of the evidence and that an opposite conclusion is clearly evident.

People v. Langdon

73 Ill. App. 3d 881 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 19, 1979

Although the sheer number of reported cases on the subject might appear to belie its simplicity, we agree with the court in Hornstein and hold that application of the rule clearly requires reversal of defendant’s conviction … When the court informed him that Romanoff’s motion to withdraw as counsel had been denied, Johnson attempted to withdraw his appearance, stating that he did not know that Romanoff, whom he characterized as a well-qualified

Winston v. City of Chicago

2019 IL App (1st) 181419 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 16, 2019

the Act has the burden of proving that immunity. … Some situations will be so benign as to clearly be, as a matter of law, below the theoretical minimum for willful and wanton conduct.

Nowak v. City of Country Club Hills

Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 27, 2010

The record establishes the following undisputed facts. … Section 1(d) of the PEDA provides that a disabled employee receiving salary benefits under that statute “shall not be entitled to any benefits for which he would qualify

Dipietro v. GATX Corp.

445 Ill. Dec. 570 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 27, 2020

-12-  1-19-2196 retaliation for his or her activities, and (3) the discharge violates clearly mandated public policy. … Instead, she attempts to qualify some of them as occurring early in her employment or to minimize the severity or frequency of the issues.

Hastings Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ultimate Backyard

358 Ill. Dec. 585 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 9, 2012

Each part shall also clearly show the points or grounds relied upon under the section on which it is based. 735 ILCS 5/2-619.1 (West 2010). … Appellees argue that the stay order does not qualify as an injunction and does not qualify as an appealable interlocutory order under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 307(a). Ill. S.Ct. R. 307(a) (eff. Feb. 26, 2010).

Rybak v. Provenzale

181 Ill. App. 3d 884 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 17, 1989

Iain McIntyre as a rebuttal expert witness in the face of his objection based on Supreme Court Rule 220 (107 Ill. 2d R. 220) and to qualify McIntyre as an expert witness. … App. 3d 902 ), and error for the court to qualify McIntyre as an expert witness — a matter within its sound discretion (People v.

People v. Chambers

200 Ill. App. 3d 538 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 22, 1990

The court found that defendant qualified for the death penalty, but found that mitigating factors were present and that it would not impose the death penalty. … To establish a violation of due process, however, defendant must show that the evidence was material. (People v. Olinger (1986), 112 Ill. 2d 324 , 493 N.E.2d 579 .)

Davis v. Attic Club

56 Ill. App. 3d 58 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 21, 1977

But it is not sufficient to state that such conditions, when established by law, except clubs from the effect of article 12b. … : “Sound rules of construction require that in those instances in which this court, prior to the adoption of the constitution of 1970, has defined a term found therein, that it be given the same definition, unless it is clearly

Village of Schaumburg v. Village of Schaumburg Firefighters' Pension Fund

2025 IL App (1st) 241764 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 27, 2025

A finding is against the manifest weight of the evidence if the opposite conclusion is clearly evident. Scepurek v. … Ried qualified for the retirement pension and the Board had the authority to issue it.

In Re Estate of Lightner

81 Ill. App. 2d 263 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 31, 1967

theory that Adams, at the time of the negotiations with his brother-in-law, was only the nominated executor, pointing out that Adams did not sign the agreement as executor, and thus no fiduciary relationship existed as established … Under such circumstances, and the state of this record, we conclude that the acts of Adams clearly arose out of the anticipated administration of the estate.

People Ex Rel. Community Unit School District No. 1 v. Decatur School District No. 61

45 Ill. App. 2d 33 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 16, 1963

At this special meeting the petition was read and evidence taken as to the number of persons residing in the area; that the Mansfields were qualified voters and that they signed the petition. … Clearly the words “except the north three hundred feet thereof” were written by a different typewriter. Both Mr. Mansfield and his wife were questioned about this difference and their testimony was not clear. Mrs.

People v. Little

322 Ill. App. 3d 607 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 16, 2001

Finding that defendant qualified for an enhanced sentence under section 5 — 5—3(c)(8) of the Unified Code of Corrections (Corrections Code) (730 ILCS 5/5 — 5—3(c)(8) (West 1998)) based on the existence of prior convictions … As defendant asserts, the record clearly reveals that defendant’s warrantless arrest preceeded the officers’ search of his person.

Essig v. Advocate Bromenn Medical Center

2015 IL App (4th) 140546 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 10, 2015

“If the plaintiff fails to establish any element of the cause of action, summary judgment for the defendant is proper.” Williams v. … While I do agree Copeland’s section 2-622 report did not qualify as an affidavit under Rule 191(a), this issue was not presented for our review.

People v. Schulz

2024 IL App (1st) 240422 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 1, 2024

¶ 29 Section 110-10(a) of the Code establishes a number of mandatory conditions that must be imposed for defendants released prior to trial. 725 ILCS 5/110-10(a) (West 2022). … The court clearly considered factors beyond the nature of the offenses charged, including the difficulties in keeping defendant from accessing the Internet.

Prince v. Hutchinson

49 Ill. App. 3d 990 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 31, 1977

Hirschtick, which he offered into evidence at trial, in order to establish the medical causation of his difficulties following the accident. Dr. … In the first instance, . any question having reference to the excluded hypothetical would clearly have served merely to have confused the jury.