Case law

Valdes v. LUMBERMEN'S MUT. CAS. CO., ETC.

507 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 2, 1980

See Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp., 416 F.2d 1257, 1260 (5th Cir. 1969) (Judge Brown dissenting), vacated, 400 U.S. 542 , 90 S.Ct. 496 , 27 L.Ed.2d 613 (1970). … Willingham v. Macon Telegraph Publishing Co., 507 F.2d 1084 (5th Cir. 1975) (en banc); Longo v. Carlisle De Coppet & Co., 537 F.2d 685 (2d Cir. 1975); Earwood v.

Green v. Ross

338 F. Supp. 365 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 6, 1972

The board is correctly deemed a “dangerous instrumentality,” though, and said reference may remain in the complaint for whatever other purpose it may serve. … Hornsby v. Fish Meal Co., 431 F.2d 865 (5th Cir. 1970); Simpson v. Knutsen, supra.

Koens v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

774 F. Supp. 2d 1215 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 25, 2011

(DE # 11, citing Smith v. … Hutton v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 144 F.Supp.2d 1325, 1327-28 (S.D.Fla.2001); Williams v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 907 F.Supp. 403, 405 (S.D.Fla.1995); Chan v.

Hudson Hale v. Wells Fargo Bank

District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 26, 2021

.”); Brown v. … Plaintiff does not specify what each Defendant did to incur liability, so the Complaint boils down to “an across-the-board allegation that every [D]efendant” engaged in wrongdoing. Weil, 816 F. App’x at 341.

Keegan v. Sterling

610 F. Supp. 789 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 30, 1985

Wilson v. Transocean Airlines, 121 F.Supp. 85 (N.D.Cal.1954). But see Rairigh v. Erlbeck, 488 F.Supp. 865 (D.Md.1980). … Spencer v. New Orleans Levee Board, 737 F.2d 435 (5th Cir.1984).

Zalazar v. Capital Force LLC

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 26, 2023

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (alteration added; quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Garfield v.

United States v. Grene

306 F. Supp. 1061 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 9, 1969

The Court considers the Parole Board to have exclusive control over the length of Grene’s incarceration. … This resentencing was affirmed on appeal, Zaffarano v.

Smith v. Carnival Corp.

584 F. Supp. 2d 1343 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 27, 2008

They purchased the tickets on board the Valor before reaching Grand Cayman, and CCL received a portion of the ticket price. Compl. ¶ 22. … NCL America, Inc., No. 05-22030-CIV-BROWN, 2007 WL 414331 , at *2 (S.D.Fla.

United States v. Certain Real Property

998 F. Supp. 1438 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 20, 1998

MEMORANDUM ORDER BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge. … (citing U.S. v.

Hung Kang Huang v. Carnival Corp.

909 F. Supp. 2d 1356 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 11, 2012

may not be held vicariously liable for the malpractice of its on-board medical providers. … See, e.g., Nanz v.

Garcia v. Broward County Public Schools

District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 6, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 511-12 (2002); see also McCone v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., 582 F. App’x 798, 801, n.4 (11th Cir. 2014) (noting that Bell Atl. Corp. v.

YNN Holding Corp. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

354 F. Supp. 2d 1334 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 28, 2005

Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). … Murphy v. FDIC, 208 F.3d 959, 963 , (11th Cir.2000); (citing Baumann v. Savers Federal Sav. and Loan Ass’n, 934 F.2d 1506, 1515 (11th Cir.1991)).

Ruiz v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION

754 F. Supp. 2d 1328 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 29, 2010

BACKGROUND Carnival employed Gregory Navarro (“Navarro”) for ten years before he committed suicide on June 14, 2009, while on board a Carnival vessel. [ECF No. 1, Ex. B ¶ 9]. … Williams v. Best Buy Co., 269 F.3d 1316, 1319 (11th Cir.2001). “Removal statutes are construed narrowly.” Burns v. Windsor Ins. Co., 31 F.3d 1092, 1095 (11th Cir.1994).

LeCounte v. City of Miami Beach

162 F. Supp. 3d 1298 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 23, 2016

Jones v. Fulton Cty., Ga., 446 Fed.Appx. 187 , 189 n. 3 (11th Cir.2011); see also Booth v. Pasco Cty., Fla., No. 8:09-CV-02621-T-30, 2010 WL 2757209 , at *11 (M.D.Fla. … Brown v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 923 F.2d 1474, 1479 (11th Cir.1991).

Meagher v. Dugger

737 F. Supp. 641 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 17, 1990

In Pinaud v. … However, such relief would impinge upon the discretion of the federal parole board, to whom authority in these matters has been accorded.

3637 Corp. v. City of Miami

314 F. Supp. 3d 1320 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 9, 2018

On May 10, 2010, the City of Miami Zoning Board adopted a second resolution ("2010 Approval") ( see id. , Ex. C, Resolution No. … Osheroff v.

Harley v. Health Center of Coconut Creek, Inc.

469 F. Supp. 2d 1212 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 21, 2006

that notifications to the Agency for Health Care Administration are “not discoverable or admissible in any civil or administrative action, except in disciplinary proceedings by the agency or the appropriate, regulatory board … In Klaxon Co. v.

Adderley v. Preferred Primary Care Associates LLC

District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 25, 2025

(citing Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 (1984)); see also ACLU v. Barnes, 168 F.3d 423, 438 (11th Cir. 1999) (“The significant disparity in their experience should be reflected in the rates awarded.”); Brown v. … “If the court concluded that the number of claimed hours is excessive, it may engage in ‘an across-the-board cut,’ so long as it provides adequate explanation for the decrease.” Galdames v. N & D Inv.

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Associated Investment Group

792 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 27, 1991

See Gunter v. Hutcheson, 674 F.2d 862 (11th Cir.1982). … McCullough, 911 F.2d 593, 602 (11th Cir.1990); FDIC v. P.L.M. Int’l, Inc., 834 F.2d 248, 254-55 (1st Cir.1987) (relying upon FDIC v. Gulf Life Ins., 737 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir.1984)); Adams v.

Mukamal v. Bakes

383 B.R. 798 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 5, 2007

The Individual Defendants were officers of one or more of the Debtors and/or served on their boards of directors and boards of directors’ executive committees. (Compl. ¶¶ 10, 19, 27, 36, 57, 66, 75, 84). … With this majority on the board, the Wellspring Defendants controlled the board of directors of Far & Wide. (Compl. ¶ 51.)