Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersflnd

691 results

1.03s

  • AITKEN

    District Court, N.D. Florida · Oct 1, 2025

    Based on the foregoing, dismissal of this case is appropriate.1 See Moon v. … (citations omitted); Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dep’t, 205 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • FALLS v. CORCORAN

    District Court, N.D. Florida · Jun 27, 2022

    Fla., 862 F.2d 1517 (11th Cir. 1989) (the Columbia County School board removed a textbook— The Humanities: Cultural Roots and Continuities Volume I—from its curriculum); Pratt v. Indep. Sch. Dist. … No. 831, Forest Lake, Minn., 670 F.2d 771 (8th Cir. 1982) (based on complaints from a group of parents, the Forest Lake school board voted to remove a film adaptation of the short story The Lottery); Zykan v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BROWNING v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

    District Court, N.D. Florida · Sep 2, 2025

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION ANTONIA BROWNING … Wilkerson v. Grinnell Corp., 270 F.3d 1314, 1317 (11th Cir. 2001). A Title VII action must then be filed in court within 90 days of receipt of the EEOC letter. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1); Perry v. S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • VAUGHN v. 3M COMPANY

    District Court, N.D. Florida · Apr 13, 2022

    Claim in August 2009 (“Board Claim”). … See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CADEJUSTE

    District Court, N.D. Florida · May 14, 2026

    Because Plaintiff has incurred at least three strikes, Plaintiff may not litigate this case in forma pauperis unless he shows that he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Brown … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CENTENNIAL BANK v. S/V LIMITLESS HULL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: RACA4093G112, HER MASTS, TOWERS BOILERS, CABLES, ENGINES, MACHINERY, SAILS, RIGGING, AUXILIARY BOATS ETC. IN REM

    District Court, N.D. Florida · Aug 10, 2020

    To conduct the survey, a marine surveyor would need to board and inspect the S/V Limitless, but the S/V Limitless would not undergo any movement or repairs. Id. at 4. … all who board the S/V Limitless to provide proof of insurance naming the custodian and the USMS as named insureds on the certificate of insurance.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barber v. Teche Greyhound Lines

    115 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, N.D. Florida · Oct 22, 1953

    The complaint alleges and the evidence shows that late at night on May 27, 1952 plaintiff boarded one of defendant’s buses at Pensacola, Florida as a paying passenger traveling to Tallahassee, Florida. … Defendant contends that the sudden emergency doctrine, which is recognized in Florida, Loftin v. Anderson, Fla., 66 So.2d 470 , is applicable and controlling in this case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yvon v. Baja Marine Corp.

    495 F. Supp. 2d 1179 · District Court, N.D. Florida · Feb 20, 2007

    See, e.g., Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Hunnings v. Texaco, Inc., 29 F.3d 1480, 1484 (11th Cir.1994); see also Swierkiewicz v. … See, e.g., FDA v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kraft v. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance

    320 F. Supp. 2d 1234 · District Court, N.D. Florida · May 10, 2004

    Evans, 340 So.2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Lorber v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 207 So.2d 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Scott v. … See Brown v. Blue *1240 Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., 898 F.2d 1556 (11th Cir.1990).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Slagle v. ITT Hartford Insurance Group

    904 F. Supp. 1346 · District Court, N.D. Florida · Sep 11, 1995

    Crawford v. American Title Insurance Co., 518 F.2d 217, 218 (5th Cir.1975); Uniforce Temporary Personnel v. … Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), where the doctrine was first announced. The state-action doctrine has nothing to do with the McCarran-Ferguson Act. .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DeGrandy v. Wetherell

    794 F. Supp. 1076 · District Court, N.D. Florida · May 29, 1992

    Compare Brooks v. … Reeves, Brown, and Hargrett. Collectively, these plans are referred to as the Lawyer’s Committee plans.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Everett v. Ribicoff

    200 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, N.D. Florida · Nov 27, 1961

    Pruitt v. Flemming, 182 F.Supp. 159 (D. C.S.D.W.Va., 1960). The “substantial evidence” rule has been involved with particular reference to review of National Labor Relations Board decisions. … Ewing v. McLean, 189 F.2d 887 (9th Cir., 1951); Willard v. Hobby, 134 F.Supp. 66 (D.C. E.D.Pa.1955); Pruitt v. Flemming, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • BAILEY v. SWINDELL

    District Court, N.D. Florida · Sep 3, 2025

    P. 72(b)(3); see also LoConte v. … See Bailey v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • SULLIVAN v. SMITH

    District Court, N.D. Florida · Dec 16, 2024

    See Brown v. Tallahassee Police 1 http://jailview.srso.net/SmartWebClient/jail.aspx Dep’t, 205 F. … (citations omitted); Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989) (“[D]ismissal upon disregard of an order, especially where the litigant has been forewarned, generally is not an abuse of discretion.”)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Navelski v. International Paper Co.

    261 F. Supp. 3d 1212 · District Court, N.D. Florida · May 21, 2017

    Id., quoted in Brown v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc,, 817 F.3d 1225, 1234 (11th Cir. 2016); see also Valley Drug Co. v. … See Parks v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Florida v. Industrial Chemicals, Inc.

    145 F.R.D. 585 · District Court, N.D. Florida · Sep 26, 1991

    North Carolina Assoc. of Black Lawyers v. North Carolina Board of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547, 548-49 (4th Cir.1976). … Borden Co. v. Sylk, 410 F.2d 843, 845 (3d Cir.1969).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • FARNEY v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC

    District Court, N.D. Florida · Jul 23, 2025

    Bamford v. Hobbs, 569 F. Supp. 160, 170 (S.D. Tex. 1983), distinguished on other grounds, Entek Corp. v. Sw. Pipe & Supply Co., 683 F. Supp. 1092, 1095 (N.D. Tex. 1988). … Blacklands R.R. v. Ne. Tex. Rural Rail Trans. Dist., No. 1:19-CV-250, 2019 WL 3613071, at *2 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2019) (quoting Atl. Marine Constr. Co., Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court for the W.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ROBINSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

    District Court, N.D. Florida · May 5, 2025

    P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962); Coleman v. St. Lucie Cnty. Jail, 433 F. App'x 716, 718 (11th Cir. 2011) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. … M/V MONADA, 432 F.3d 1333, 1337 (11th Cir. 2005)); Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dep't, 205 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lundy v. United States

    78 F. Supp. 354 · District Court, N.D. Florida · Jun 8, 1948

    Co. v. Daniel, 109 Fla. 496 , 149 So. 401 ; Dunn Bus Co. v. McKinley, 130 Fla. 778 , 178 So. 865 ; Petroleum Carrier Corporation v. Hall, 158 Fla. 549 , 29 So.2d 624 . … While the negligence of plaintiff’s decedent also defeats plaintiff’s right to recover for the injuries she suffered in the accident (Fuller v. Darnell, 100 Fla. 773 , 129 So. 915 , 74 A.L.R. 1 ; Sea Board Air Line Ry.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • TOBIN

    District Court, N.D. Florida · Apr 28, 2026

    See Dupree v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.