Case law

Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 8, 2021

Applicable Law A claimant has a statutory right to be represented at a hearing before an ALJ. 42 U.S.C. § 406; see also Brown v. … Brown, 44 F.3d at 935.

Hart v. Credit Control, LLC

214 F. Supp. 3d 1259 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Oct 17, 2016

See Torres v. Pro-Collect, Inc., 865 F.Supp.2d 1108, 1105 (D. Colo. 2012) 1 ; Kuberski v. Cred X Debt Recovery, LLC, No. 11-CV-03247-RPM-KLM, 2012 WL 2943726 , at *9 (D. Colo. July 2, 2012); Dorris v. … Brown v. Van Ru Credit Corp., 804 F.3d 740, 743 (6th Cir. 2015) (finding voicemail from debt col *1265 lector left at debtor’s work was not a communication under the FDCPA after considering contents of the message).

Jackson v. Fiorucci

District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 1, 2022

Brown, 392 F.3d 1283, 1294 (11th Cir. 2004) (medical malpractice claim insufficient to establish liability under § 1983). … See Brown v. Crawford, 906 F.2d 667, 671 (11th Cir. 1990).

Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania v. Peters

550 F. Supp. 2d 1363 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 13, 2008

See Marran v. … See Ziemba v.

Adkins v. Charlotte C.I.

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 25, 2024

Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Sec. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978). … McDowell v. Brown, 392 F.3d 12838, 1289 (11th Cir. 2004). Adkins does not allege that Charlotte C.I., the FDOC, or Centurion have a custom or policy that caused a violation of his constitutional rights.

Harrison

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 17, 2026

v. … Nov. 12, 2024); Marcum v. Kijakazi, No. 3:19-cv- 959-JRK, 2021 WL 3190545, at *5 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2021); Dietz v. Saul, No. 3:19-cv-95-J- 34PDB, 2020 WL 13337796, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2020); Beard v.

WYNN OIL COMPANY v. Purolator Chemical Corp.

391 F. Supp. 522 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 20, 1974

Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974); City of Detroit v. Grinnell, 495 F.2d 448 (2nd Cir. 1974); Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. … United Shoe Machinery Corp., 245 F.Supp. 258 (M.D.Pa.1965), vacated on other grounds, 377 F.2d 776 (3rd Cir. 1967), rev’d on other grounds, 392 U.S. 481 , 88 S.Ct. 2224 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1231 (1968); Stryker & Brown v.

Love v. Shalala

827 F. Supp. 720 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 13, 1993

In fact, the de novo review standard is essential to the constitutionality of this act according to the court in Jeffrey S. v. State Board of Education of the State of Georgia, 896 F.2d 507 (11th Cir.1990). … Cherry v. Heckler, 760 F.2d 1186 (11th Cir.1985) (quoting Howard v. Califano, 590 F.2d 137, 138 (5th Cir.1979) (per curiam)).

Holland v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 1, 2023

Berg, and Laura Brown. (Doc. 29 at 16-21.) The Court disagrees. … See Rice v.

Delgado Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Florida · Feb 21, 2020

Tuggerson-Brown v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 572 F. App’x 949, 950 (11th Cir. 2014) (quoting Jamison v. Bowen, 814 F.2d 585, 588 (11th Cir. 1987)). … Tuggerson-Brown, 572 F. App’x at 951 (quoting Jamison, 814 F.2d at 588).

DeShiro v. Branch

1 F. Supp. 2d 1357 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 17, 1998

Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. at 322-23. … The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Walters v.

United States v. Bicoastal Corp. (In Re Bicoastal Corp.)

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,076 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 29, 1991

Id. at 966 , citing National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 , 104 S.Ct. 1188 , 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1984). … Debtor cites National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 , 104 S.Ct. 1188 , 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1984), as authority for rejecting an executory contract without court approval.

Jean v. Marion County Courts

District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 6, 2022

See Brown v. Jones, No. 4:16cv777-RH/CAS, 2017 WL 2783988 (N.D. Fla. … Brown, 2017 WL 2783988, at *1.

Hammer Brand, LLC v. Voro Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 19, 2023

Mitchell v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 294 F.3d 1309, 1316 (11th Cir. 2002). … See Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985) (“The rule is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that ...

First Railroad Community Federal Credit Union v. Columbia County Bank

849 F. Supp. 780 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 15, 1994

Spence v. Zimmerman, 873 F.2d 256, 257 (11th Cir.1989). The nonmovant need not be given the benefit of every inference, but only of every “reasonable” inference. Brown v. … Id. at 196 (citing Pennsylvania v. Curtiss National Bank, 427 F.2d 395 (5th Cir.1970); 3 Riverside Bank v. Maxa, 45 So.2d 678 (Fla.1950); Crosby v. Lewis, 523 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 5th Dist.Ct.App.1988)).

Osmar v. City of Orlando

844 F. Supp. 2d 1242 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Feb 23, 2012

Parrish v. Board of Commissioners, 524 F.2d 98, 103 (5th Cir.1975). … United States v. Jordan, 49 F.3d at 157 . If the question of whether § 455(a) requires disqualification is a close one, the *1244 balance tips in favor of recusal. United States v.

Corkery v. SuperX Drugs Corp.

602 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Feb 1, 1985

In Whilhelm v. … McWilliams [v. Escambia County School Board, 658 F.2d 326 (5th Cir.

Denmark v. Florida Department of Revenue

District Court, M.D. Florida · Sep 30, 2024

See Brown v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue Off. of Child Support Enf't, 697 F. App'x 692 (11th Cir. 2017) (affirming dismissal of suit against Florida Department of Revenue on grounds of Eleventh Amendment immunity). … United States v.

Aiyekusibe v. The Hertz Corporation

District Court, M.D. Florida · May 11, 2021

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION BAMIDELE AIYEKUSIBE, MISCHELE HIGGINSON, and SHANTAL BROWN … Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate any pending deadlines and close the file.

Hansen v. Payspan, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida · Feb 4, 2020

See Brown v. … See F.T.C. v. AbbVie Prods. LLC, 713 F.3d 54, 63-64 (11th Cir. 2013) (explaining type of document entitled to presumption); Romero v.