Case law

Kolinske v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

530 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 25, 1982

Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209, 222 , 97 S.Ct. 1782, 1792-93 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 , reh’g denied, 433 U.S. 915 , 97 S.Ct. 2989 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1102 (1977), Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks v. … Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209, 234 , 97 S.Ct. 1782,1799 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977).

Woodland v. D.C. Department of Corrections Medical Staff

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 2024

see Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 101 (2006); Ali v. … Johnson v. Dist. of Columbia, 869 F. Supp. 2d 34, 36 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Brengettcy v. Horton, 423 F.3d 674, 682 (7th Cir. 2005); Dale v.

United States v. United States Gypsum Company

124 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 1954

Co. v. Hocking Valley Ry. … United States v. Swift & Co., 286 U.S. 106, 114 , 52 S.Ct. 460 , 76 L.Ed. 999 . Also United States v.

United States v. Ali

885 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2012

Ali boarded the CEC Future two days after it was taken by the pirates. … Id. at 23 (statement of Kavanaugh, J.); accord id. at 6–7 (statement of Brown, J.)

Pryor-El v. Kelly

892 F. Supp. 261 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 27, 1995

On July 19, 1994, the Program Review board recommended that the contents of Plaintiffs locker be inventoried and excess property shipped home. See Defendants’ Motion at Exh. 5. … See Brown v. Dodson, 863 F.Supp. 284 (W.D.Ya.1994). Accordingly, the Court shall GRANT the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs claims regarding the alleged failure to follow grievance procedures. B.

Hickman v. Nasa

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Nonetheless, pro se plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Keystone Shipping Co. v. United States

729 F. Supp. 136 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1990

Seabulk protested the findings of the board. … Ciba-Geigy Corp. v.

Knowlton v. United States

111 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 1999

Simms v. … Wesley v.

Russell-Murray Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius

724 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2010

Ass’n v. … to exercise its discretion on the plaintiffs behalf, as such an action [was] not a ‘final decision’ of the Board”); Arcadia Valley Hosp. v.

Waters v. Armenian Genocide Museum & Memorial, Inc.

924 F. Supp. 2d 183 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2013

See Baloch v. Norton, 517 F. Supp. 2d 345, 348 (D.D.C. 2007), aff’d sub nom. Baloch v. Kempthorne, 550 F.3d 1191 (D.C. Cir. 2008); see also Am. Wildlands v. Kempthorne, 530 F.3d 991, 1001 (D.C. … v.

Allen v. Yellen

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 2023

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.

Johnson v. Hughes

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2019

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The complaint is illegible and incoherent, and its attachments shed no light on the claim or claims plaintiff intends to bring.

Bova v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2020

Hines’ wounds to those sustained by Randy Gaddo, a claimant in Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 872 F. … Brown, 872 F. Supp. 2d at 44.

National Security Archive v. Executive Office of the President

688 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 1988

Paisley v. … As Judge Bazelon observed in Soucie v.

Taylor v. Law Office of Galiher, Clarke & Galiher

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 2015

Herbin v. Hoeffel, 806 A.2d 186, 194 (D.C. 2002); Smith v. Haden, 872 F. … Niosi v. Aiello, 69 A.2d 57, 60 (D.C. 1949). Here, plaintiff does not allege “a legally cognizable injury,” Chase v.

Qtaish v. Malman

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 12, 2023

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As here, “[a] confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr.

United States v. Fields

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 2, 2020

Compare United States v. … DATE: December 23, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Ruther v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 2019

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … v.

Akers v. Beal Bank

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2009

Prows v. Dep’t of Justice, 1991 WL 111459, at *1 (D.D.C. June 13, 1991) (citing Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977)). … See Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 498. There are defects in the plaintiff’s complaint, as the defendants duly note. See Defs.’ Mot. at 2-3.

Smith v. Eeoc

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 2019

Smith v. Casellas, 119 F.3d 33, 34 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 958 (1997); McCottrell v. … .”); Brown v. Berrein, 923 F.