Case law

Sewell v. Chao

532 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2008

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). Once plaintiff has established a prima facie case, the burden shifts to defendant to articulate some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions. … Patterson v. Johnson, 505 F.3d 1296, 1298 (D.C.Cir.2007) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452-55 (D.C.Cir. 1999)).

Allen v. Yellen

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 2023

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Operative Plasters' & Cement Masons' International Association of the United States & Canada, Afl-Cio

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2011

Postal Workers Union v. U.S. Postal Serv., 550 F.3d 27, 32 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (citing United Paperworkers Int'l Union v. … See Carey v. Westinghouse Elec.

Lazaridis v. United States Department of Justice

713 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2010

(follow “About Us” hyperlink; then follow “Board of Directors” hyperlink); cf. with Dong, 125 F.3d at 879 (finding it “plain that the Smithsonian is not an [executive branch] establishment” where most of the governing Board … Foretich v. Glamour, 741 F.Supp. 247, 250 (D.D.C.1990). 4 . Neither Mr. Lazaridis nor the website suggests that the executive branch has a hand in appointing board members. 5 . Mr.

Federal Trade Commission v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.

502 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 16, 2007

Brown Shoe Co. v. … United States v. Philadelphia Nat’l Bank, 374 U.S. at 362 , 83 S.Ct. 1715 ; see Brown Shoe Co. v.

Corrinet v. Burke

District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK STEVEN CORRINET, Plaintiff, v. … Howard Foundation and all its board members for libel, defamation, and negligence, based on an article board member Paul Herman wrote in the Robert E.

Qtaish v. Malman

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 12, 2023

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As here, “[a] confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr.

Eastern Pequot Tribal Nation v. Salazar

934 F. Supp. 2d 272 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2013

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See McNeil v.

Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co. v. Saxon

211 F. Supp. 576 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 1962

Commercial State Bank of Roseville v. Gidney, D.C., 174 F.Supp. 770, 778 , aff’d, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 37 , 278 F.2d 871 (1960); Camden Trust Co. v. … Relying on the authority of Braeburn Securities Corp. v.

Jennings v. Connally

347 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 1972

Pay Board Release, PB-39. … See also, Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 (1944). 24 .

Scott v. District of Columbia

598 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “[A] complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet AF 21. Nov. 2001 v. … Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . The accuracy of Captain Scott’s time entries is not a matter of public concern.

Howard v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives

840 F. Supp. 2d 52 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2012

Id. at 26 (Brown, J., concurring in the judgment). … Fields, 459 F.3d at 32 (Brown, J., concurring in the judgment).

Adams v. Bennett

675 F. Supp. 668 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 1987

Brown v. Weinberger, 417 F.Supp. 1215 (D.D.C.1976). Relief in that case was for the most part consolidated with Adams in the December 29, 1977 order. … As noted previously, the expanded geographical scope of the litigation resulted from the consolidation of this action with Brown v.

American Federation of Government Employees v. Pierce

586 F. Supp. 1559 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 1984

Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Martin v.

Washington v. Geren

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2010

WASHINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1502 (JR) … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Both the memorandum and the order gave fair warning that failure to comply with the order would mean dismissal of the case.

Banks v. Astrue

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2010

ANALYSIS In reviewing the decision of an ALJ, a district court must determine whether the ALJ's finding are supported by "substantial evidence." 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Brown v. … Supp. 1193, 1195 (D.D.C. 1983)); accord Brown, 794 F.2d at 705, to determine whether the ALJ "has analyzed all evidence and has sufficiently explained the weight he has given to obviously probative exhibits." Simms v.

Kurtz v. Baker

630 F. Supp. 850 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 1986

Defendants argue that no one has the right to address Congress on topics of their personal concern, citing Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. … The State Board recognized, however, "that not every instructor agrees with the official faculty view on every policy question.” Id. 104 S.Ct. at 1062. 3 . See Wallace v.

East Alabama Medical Center v. Shalala

925 F. Supp. 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 1996

Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Celotex Corp. v. … Simpson v. Young, 854 F.2d 1429, 1435 (D.C.Cir.1988).

Peeples v. Geraci

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 2025

See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 499–500 (1973); Brown v. Plaut, 131 F.3d 163, 168–69 (D.C. Cir. 1997). … See Taylor v. U.S.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Musk

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2026

Musk told a member of Twitter’s Board of Directors, whom the Complaint identifies as Board Member A, that he owned at least seven percent of Twitter’s stock. Compl. ¶ 30. Mr. … .”); Brown v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., No. 13-cv-131, 2013 WL 3442042, at *4 (W.D. Tex.