Case law

Beavers v. Hill

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2011

Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues two attorneys for at least the third time in this Court. See Beavers v. Watrers, No. 10-1120 (D.D.C. … T00ley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see Cala’well v. Kagan, 777 F.

Winder Hma LLC v. Burwell

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2016

Oceana, Inc. v. Locke, 670 F.3d 1238, 1240 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting C & W Fishing Co. v. Fox, 931 F.2d 1556, 1562 (D.C. Cir. 1991)). … Ctr. v. Shalala, 81 F.3d 743, 751 n.7 (8th Cir. 1996)).

United States v. Gossjankowski

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2023

omitted); see United States v. Brown, 185 F. Supp. 3d at 82. … United States v. Wilson, 540 F.2d 1100, 1101 (D.C. Cir. 1976); see United States v. Brown, 185 F. Supp. 3d at 82.

Buie v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 2021

Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 (1997). … Brown.

Jamison v. Federal Trade Commission

628 F. Supp. 1548 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 1986

The New York legislature has occasionally considered legislation to limit physician participation on the boards of directors of Blue Shield plans, and a bill limiting such participation to one-fourth of the seats on the boards … See Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 750 F.2d 81, 88 (D.C.Cir.1984). Plaintiffs argue that TRAC is inapplicable to cases raising constitutional claims.

Dozier-Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 2009

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff sues President George Bush, Justice John Paul Stevens, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, former U.S.

Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Harris

501 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 1980

One member of the Board dissented from this decision. … Retroactive application of § 2202.7 was recently held impermissible in John Muir Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Harris, No. 79-2686 (N.D.Cal.

Cousart v. Metro Transit Police Chief

101 F. Supp. 3d 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2015

Hammel v. Marsh USA Inc., ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, 2015 WL 525765, at *3 (D.D.C. Feb. 10, 2015) (citing cases). … Brown v. Children’s Nat’l Med. Ctr., 773 F. Supp. 2d 125, 140 (D.D.C. 2011) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

United States v. Gaffney

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 2025

United States v. Brown, 520 F.2d 1106, 1112 (D.C. Cir. 1975). … United States v. Brown, 483 F.2d 1314, 1318 (D.C. Cir. 1973) (when applying federal rules, D.C. defendants in federal court should not be treated more harshly than defendants in other federal courts).

Newman v. Quigg

681 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1988

Fregeau v. Mossinghoff, 776 F.2d 1034 (Fed.Cir.1985). … Id. at 1038 (quoting Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573 , 105 S.Ct. 1504, 1511 , 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985)). Review by the court of appeals is confined to the PTO record and the Board’s decision.

Central Iowa Hospital Corp. v. Sebelius

762 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2011

Luke’s Hosp. v. Sebelius, 611 F.3d 900 (D.C.Cir.2010). In St. … Luke’s Hosp. v.

Spadone v. McHugh

842 F. Supp. 2d 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 2012

“Generally . . . issues and arguments not made before the relevant military correction board or administrative agency are deemed waived and could not be raised in a judicial tribunal.” Christian v. … for unintentionally failing the Cadet Physical Fitness Test because the Board ignored precedent that disallowed recoupment for failing that test); El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Ctr., Inc. v.

Sharpe v. Bair

580 F. Supp. 2d 123 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2008

See Brown, 199 F.3d at 456 . … Brown v. Small, 437 F.Supp.2d 125, 131 (2006) (Walton, J.) (quoting Reeves v.

Hudson v. Smart

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 18, 2009

Lott Hudson, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). In addition, the complaint must allege facts sufficient to permit the court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the case.

Swanson v. Howard University

249 F. Supp. 3d 259 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 2017

See id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Henok v. Chase Home Fin., LLC, 926 F.Supp.2d 100, 104 (D.D.C. 2013), quoting Brown v. FBI, 873 F.Supp.2d 388, 408 (D.D.C. 2012).

Cristwell v. Veneman

224 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2002

(citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Bayer v. United States Dept. of the Treasury, 956 F.2d 330, 332 (D.C.Cir.1992)). … Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).

Wayne v. Unknown

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Local 1031, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Herzog

98 F. Supp. 613 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 1951

The Board has filed a motion to- dismiss. The Court sustains the motion to dismiss on the authority of N.L.R.B, v. Minn. *614 Mining & Mfg. Co., 8 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 323, 325 . … Under the latter statute it was held in Warehousemen’s Union, Local 117, etc. v.

Simmons v. Marsh

564 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 1983

See, e.g., Sanders v. United States, 594 F.2d 804 (Ct.Cl.1979); Powell v. Marsh, 560 F.Supp. 636 (D.D.C.1983); Knehans v. Callaway, 403 F.Supp. 290 (D.D.C.1975), aff’d sub nom., Knehans v. Alexander, 566 F.2d 312 (D.C. … See, e.g., Powell v. Marsh, 560 F.Supp. 636 (D.D. C.1983). Thus, the Court ordinarily reviews only the record (i.e., the evidence before the ABCMR) to determine whether the Board’s decision is supportable.

Fuentes v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 2020

Tobias, the Chairperson of HHS’s Departmental Appeals Board. See Compl. ¶¶ 13–18. … Wilbur v. U.S. ex rel. Kadrie, 281 U.S. 206, 218 (1930); see also U.S. ex rel. McLennan v.