Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.46s
953 F. Supp. 2d 251 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 2013
notice of the final order or decision of the Board.” § 7703(b)(1)(A). … Konarski v. Brown, No. 03-5340, 2004 WL 1249346, at *1 (D.C. Cir. June 7, 2004) (per curiam) (citation omitted). Any waiver of sovereign immunity must be clear and unequivocal. United States v.
Cited 37 timesPublished826 F. Supp. 2d 241 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2011
However, unlike a jurisdictional award, this determination by the Board does not freeze the duties or work tasks of the employees in the unit found appropriate. Plumbing Contractors Ass’n of Baltimore v. … See Carey v. Westinghouse Elec.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAustralia/Eastern U.S.A. Shipping Conference v. United States
537 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 1982
(Chilling effect of required teacher disclosure to board of education of all organizational associations for the past five years outweighs any legitimate state interest in the information). Bates v. … The court compared the power of the Commission over the economic livelihood of longshoremen to the power of the board of education over the teachers in Shelton v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedTacka v. Georgetown University
193 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2001
Compare Restatement (Second) of Torts § 583, cmt. d(2) (1977), quoted in Wallace, 715 A.2d at 881, n. 14 (“A, a school teacher, is summarily discharged by the school board. … B, the president of the board, publishes the reason. A has consented to the publication even though it turns out to be defamatory.”).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2009
Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A.: Account #6459648 in the name of Brown Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A. … as Custodian for Opportunity Fund; Account #6459747 in the name of Brown Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A. as Custodian for Opportunity Fund FBO Opportunity Fund-Reserve; Account #6459606 in the name of Brown Brothers
Cited 0 timesPublishedNails v. Civilian Claims Disability
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 2011
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 28, 2023
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2022
Mot. at 12–15, the WOFR Board has made a recommendation regarding plaintiff’s discharge, but a recommendation – as the word implies – is not the same as a final decision. See also Toms v. … See Shaw v. Austin, 539 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished160 F. Supp. 3d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 2015
See Brown v. Whole Foods, 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Howard v. Pritzker, 775 F.3d 430, 436 (D.C. Cir. 2015). 9 In United States v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedHolland v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
301 F. Supp. 3d 218 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2018
See Brown v. Bank of Am. , Civil Action No. 13-13256-PBS, 2015 WL 5163045 , at *3 (D. Mass. … Brown , 2015 WL 5163045 , at *3 (citing Foregger v. Residential Credit Sols., Inc. , Civil Action No. 12-11914-FDS, 2014 WL 1364788 , at *4 (D. Mass. Apr. 4, 2014) ).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2009
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2025
Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. … Berrios v. NYC Hous.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 2010
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). ] • t!
Cited 0 timesPublished105 F. Supp. 266 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 1952
As was stated in Jones v. … Railway Co. v. Sayles, 97 U.S. 554 , 24 L.Ed. 1053 ; Schriber-Schroth Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished270 F. Supp. 3d 296 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 2017
See Horne v. Flores, 557 U.S. 433, 446 (2009) (citing Arlington Heights v. Metro. Housing Dev. … See, e.g., McCreath v. Holder, 573 F.3d 38, 41 (1st Cir. 2009); Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir. 2008); Hamdan v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1051, 1061 (7th Cir. 2005); Nativi-Gomez v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2018
Benefits decisions may be further appealed to the relevant board for correction of military records, such as the AFBCMR. See, e.g., Blackwood v. United States, 187 F. Supp. 3d 837, 839 (W.D. Ky. 2016). … “As a preliminary matter, the Board did nothing improper by relying on an advisory opinion to render its decision.” McDonough v. Stackley, 245 F. Supp. 3d 1, 5 (D.D.C. 2017); see Roberts v.
Cited 0 timesPublished910 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2012
Supp. 2d at 17 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705 (D.C. Cir. 1986)). … Nicholson v. Social Security Admin., Civil Action No. 10-2010 (RWR), 2012 WL 4466853, at *1 (D.D.C. September 27, 2012) (quoting Brown v. Barnhart, 370 F.
Cited 18 timesPublishedMobley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
907 F. Supp. 495 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 1995
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Browning, 839 F.Supp. 1508, 1512 (W.D.Okla.1993). See also Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. … For the reasons stated in Browning and Christ , the regulations now preempt state law. 2 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2025
Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff’s complaint fails to comply with the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a). The complaint and its exhibits span 142 pages. … Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); see Brandon v. District of Columbia Bd. of Parole, 734 F.2d 56, 59 (D.C. Cir. 1984); cf. Anders v.
Cited 0 timesPublished681 F. Supp. 896 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1988
See Demjanjuk v. … See Tel-Oren v.
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna