The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEB i ~. ~Dl1
Clerk. U.S. District & B k
Courts tor the District OfanC r,uptcy
o umbla
ANGELA DENISE NAILS, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
Civil Action No.
.11 (J~6~J
CIVILIAN CLAIMS DISABILITY, )
)
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiffs application to proceed in
forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the
complaint.
The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by
pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted
by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however,
must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239
(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint
contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a
short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand
for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum
standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to
prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the
/
(l
doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Plaintiff alleges that she "was injured while [she] was a Civilian employee," and that she
"is seeking the damages that was [sic] never paid ... when [she] was injured." Compi. at 1.
Although plaintiff clearly states her demand for $100,000 in "damages for Pain and Suffering,
Medical cost[s] and Mental disfigurement," id. at 2, her complaint does not allege facts sufficient
to provide fair notice to defendant of the claims against it. As drafted, the complaint fails to
comply with Rule 8(a) and it will be dismissed.
An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.
~K&-~
JUdge~
United States DistJct
DATE: F.J. '1/ /;Ln c¥
2