Case law

Qtaish v. Washington, Dc

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 28, 2023

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v.

Husain v. Shah

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 2015

See Compl., Ex. 3 (Initial Decision, Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket Number DC-0752-15-0400-1-1, dated April 10, 2015) at 2. … She was advised that she could seek review either by filing an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) or by pursuing a grievance under the collective bargaining agreement, but not both.

Long v. Gonzalez

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937,1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). /' ;(1  Plaintiff, a resident of Ox on Hill, Maryland, sues "Raul M. Gozalez, Secretary of DOJ" but for what conduct is unknown.

Girma v. US Department of Education

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2010

D\srr\cf and ) Bankruptcy Courts Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) . … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977).

Jackson v. District of Columbia

537 F. Supp. 2d 173 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2008

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

Long v. Furr

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). (~  Plaintiff, a resident of Oxon Hill, Maryland, sues an individual apparently associated with a Giant Food Store in Oxon Hill, Maryland.

Long v. Gangon

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). I ~ I  Plaintiff, a resident of Oxon Hill, Maryland, sues an individual apparently associated with Red Lobster in Lanham, Maryland.

Long v. Lanier

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). /  Plaintiff, a resident of Oxon Hill, Maryland, sues Cathy Lanier, Chief of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department.

Wilber v. United States Government

District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 2010

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). … Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187, 192 (1996); United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206,212 (1983); FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 484-85 (1994).

Boling v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2017

In February 1999, the District of Columbia Board of Parole (D.C. Board) released Mr. Boling, subject to a 48-year period of supervision, until June 2047. Within months of Mr. … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.

Pfeiffer v. Central Intelligence Agency

721 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 1989

Shortly before his retirement, plaintiff submitted a purportedly “unclassified” version of the Internal Investigation Report to the CIA’s Publication Review Board (Board) for prepublication review. … Dudman Communications Corp. v. Department of the Air Force, 815 F.2d 1565 (D.C.Cir.1987); Russell v.

Howard v. United States Police Department

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v.

Davis v. Vilsack

880 F. Supp. 2d 156 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2012

P. 12(b)(6); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … Irwin, 498 U.S. at 96 (citing Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984)).

Sultan v. Business Bureau

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, the Count cannot discern plaintiffs claim or claims.

Georgetown Canal & Riverside Council v. Clouser

223 F. Supp. 885 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1963

This Court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the Board. In Selden v. … Courts should not substitute their opinion for the Board’s.” In addition, this court can reverse only when it determines that the administrative ruling was arbitrary and unreasonable. In Lewis v.

In Re Any & All Funds & Assets in Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Acct 8870792 in Name of Tiger Eye Investments Ltd.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2009

Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A.: Account #6459648 in the name of Brown Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A. … as Custodian for Opportunity Fund; Account #6459747 in the name of Brown Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A. as Custodian for Opportunity Fund FBO Opportunity Fund-Reserve; Account #6459606 in the name of Brown Brothers

Gillet v. King

931 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1996

See Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 , 96 S.Ct. 893, 901 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976); Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); White v. … Plaintiff contends, however, that the standard articulated in Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), gives his due process claim merit. Plaintiff is incorrect.

Guo v. National Endowment for Democracy

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2022

See Sanchez v. … Sickles v. Torres Adv. Enters. Solutions, LLC, No. 11-cv-2224, 2020 WL 5530357, at *16 (D.D.C. Sept. 14, 2020) (quoting Devnew v. 28 Brown & Brown, Inc., 396 F.

Shodeke v. Attorney General of the United States

391 F. Supp. 219 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 1975

Plaintiffs took an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, again urging that the statutes in question were unconstitutional. The Board denied plaintiffs’ appeal on January 20, 1975. … In Cheng Fan Kwok v.

Clayton v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2019

Circuit cases have also approved of using the Browning-Ferris test to resolve joint-employment claims. See Browning-Ferris Indus. v. NLRB, 911 F.3d 1195, 1209 (D.C. … NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus., 691 F.2d 1117, 1124 (3d Cir. 1982). “This is ‘essentially a factual issue.’” Dunkin’ Donuts Mid-Atl. Distribution Center v. NLRB, 363 F.3d 437, 440 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (quoting Boire v.